Jump to content

Holliday called up!


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. If the Orioles win the World Series in 5 games, some of you would be upset they didn’t win in 4. 

Well they started Hays instead of Kjerstad in game 3 against Kershaw so that means Elias doesn't care about winning. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChuckS said:

We’ll find out tomorrow. I’d bet on an injury to someone. 

So a random injury would cause them to deviate from their original set plans?  Doesn’t seem to jibe with how they operate.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emmett16 said:

Why? He makes a tad over  league minimum.  Seems like it makes perfect sense.  They likely knew that was the plan/date all along.  Strange thing is why not just stick with Wong.  

With his service time he is owed that money regardless if he stays up or not. 
 

Why I wondered if something else is up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, emmett16 said:

So a random injury would cause them to deviate from their original set plans?  Doesn’t seem to jibe with how they operate.  

It will probably take an injury for a few of the guys in triple A to get a chance any time soon.

It’s part of the equation among other things. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Unless there's an injury, it seems to me this was just about having him avoid the early string of lefties.

I wouldn’t be shocked if his performance, plus Urias/Kemp’s performance, plus the couple of close (or near close) losses impacted by the anemic offense may have slightly impacted the conversation. But this was probably always the plan unless he actually genuinely struggled, in which case the Kemp move was probably decent insurance to cover the team through May/June. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nevadaO said:

Clearly they were just waiting for the team to bring back the sprinkler celebration

Rumors on X are that Holliday said he wasn't coming up unless they went back to it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Morgan423 said:

Unless someone actually is going on the IL and there's no need to drop a player. 

So…all along they were planning to game his service time and an injury popped up (the day before full year service time date) and they changed their minds/plans at the very last minute?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...