Jump to content

Cal thinks Holiday moved to fast through the system


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Just now, Sports Guy said:

He said nothing wrong.  Hell, even Elias said maybe they moved him too fast.

Nothing that was said should be looked at as anything more than trying to figure out why he struggled in a very small sample size.

People flipping out over this are focused on one thing…”maybe he was moved too fast” and are running with it as if it’s some indictment. 
 

Just an awful interpretation by some. It’s the definition of trying to find a problem because you want to.

First off , no one here is flipping out.

Secondly it's fine for the FO to say something that a member of ownership should keep in their pocket.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

First off , no one here is flipping out.

Secondly it's fine for the FO to say something that a member of ownership should keep in their pocket.

Nothing Cal said should be kept in his pocket because he didn’t say anything that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest.   Really surprised this thread is still going.  I think Cal's comments are essentially a nothing burger (Elias has all but agreed with them already).   Only thing I think is worth monitoring is if this ends up becoming a pattern with Cal.  And I don't really expect it to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Aglets said:

I'll be honest.   Really surprised this thread is still going.  I think Cal's comments are essentially a nothing burger (Elias has all but agreed with them already).   Only thing I think is worth monitoring is if this ends up becoming a pattern with Cal.  And I don't really expect it to.

It surprises you that people are running with a nothing comment and acting like it’s some problem?  are you new to the internet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, RZNJ said:

He didn’t question the GM or anyone else.  That’s just a bad take.

I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  

Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing. 

It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  

Gotta admit it got a conversation going on here - not that it takes much! I call for adjournment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...