Jump to content

Sunday Afternoon May 26th: Orioles at White Sox going for the four game sweep. (Start of game to be delayed by rain)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hallas said:

There's not a while lot of evidence that most starters can't go at least 105 pitches before becoming an injury risk.  Maybe you handicap it because Bradish is coming off PRP on his elbow but you usually are pulling starters early because hitters are better at hitting against pitchers the 3rd time thru the lineup. 

 

I think if a pitcher tells you he's tires you listen but if they seem ok it's probably fine.

Given that he's just a couple pitches short of his career high, I have to think he's done.   And the White Sox have 2 lefties in the next 3 coming up and our best candidate for 8th inning reliever is a lefty.   Pretty much a no brainer move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ExileAngelos said:

You mean it's hard to go beyond 7 in the way modern day pitchers are treated.  His pitch count is very reasonable. It wasn't that long ago that starters threw more than 120 pitches before there was any concern.

Not 120 pitches that have to be gripped as tightly as they do now. Not with this type of spin and velocity, even hi velo on secondary pitches. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExileAngelos said:

You mean it's hard to go beyond 7 in the way modern day pitchers are treated.  His pitch count is very reasonable. It wasn't that long ago that starters threw more than 120 pitches before there was any concern.

Yes, but that was the 80s 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

Is his pitch count reasonable for a guy coming off a UCL strain and PRP shot that made him miss spring training and a month of the season? Would you throw him 20 more pitches in a game that means nothing in May?

Come on man, you know this scenario would be the same no matter who was throwing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

Given that he's just a couple pitches short of his career high, I have to think he's done.   And the White Sox have 2 lefties in the next 3 coming up and our best candidate for 8th inning reliever is a lefty.   Pretty much a no brainer move.

They already gave him his hand shakes and congrats. His day is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

Given that he's just a couple pitches short of his career high, I have to think he's done.   And the White Sox have 2 lefties in the next 3 coming up and our best candidate for 8th inning reliever is a lefty.   Pretty much a no brainer move.

Oh for sure he's done after the 7th, just saying stretching him out to finish the 7th isn't all thay risky from an injury standpoint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ExileAngelos said:

Come on man, you know this scenario would be the same no matter who was throwing.

I'm talking specifically about Bradish. I think if he were completely healthy he'd probably get the 8th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...