Jump to content

Cade Povich 2024


Pickles

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

We got Eflin. He is your Burnes replacement. We start the year with Eflin-Grayson-Kremer. That isn't much different than Burnes-Grayson-Kremer. If you sign two more SP there is no room for any of Povich, Suarez , Rogers, Young and McDermott. I do not think Kremer is going to be our 5th starter. 

I like Eflin but the idea that we go into next season with him as our ace.......🤢🤮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

That is a crazy pessimistic take. Kremer is our #3 starter in the wild card series, he is not a #5! But yeah if you count Means or similar on a MiL deal as a second starter, sure. I don't think we are getting multiple Eovaldi types. 

Kremer is our #3 by default right now, and Suarez is arguably #3 anyway.

Im hoping Means will take a team friendly deal, but we still need two solid starters.

If/when we get them, we’ll figure something out, but let’s get them first.

regardless, Means/Wells/Bradish won’t be available until mid-season anyway, so, again, they can’t be counted on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, HowAboutThat said:

Kremer is our #3 by default right now, and Suarez is arguably #3 anyway.

Im hoping Means will take a team friendly deal, but we still need two solid starters.

If/when we get them, we’ll figure something out, but let’s get them first.

regardless, Means/Wells/Bradish won’t be available until mid-season anyway, so, again, they can’t be counted on.

What is the argument for Suarez being #3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

Under what scenario would he be left off the wild card roster? 
I don’t see one. It would require Bowman and Baker both over him, which would be insane.

Burnes, Eflin, Kremer, Suarez, Dominguez, Soto, Cano, Akin, Perez, DC and Webb…those 11 definitely stay.

Doubtful they go with 13 pitchers…no need to.  Do they go with 11 pitchers or 12?  I would guess 12 but really it’s not necessary to have more than 8 relievers.

So, that leaves Povich or Bowman.  Povich gives you length but he also isn’t used to pitching out of the pen.

I think Povich is on the roster for the next series and he could even start game 1 but I think him being left off for this series is at least on the table.

I would think he gets the spot though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Three Run Homer said:

We need to resign Burnes, or replace him with someone comparable.  If you want to win the World Series, you need a legitimate ace.  We don't need two sign 2 backend guys.  

I never said that though. I absolutely agree they need to do what you said . I want a legit ace and someone like a solid 4. The Orioles need to capitalize on this young inexpensive team and strike while the iron is hot. 

Edited by Baseball fandom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Burnes, Eflin, Kremer, Suarez, Dominguez, Soto, Cano, Akin, Perez, DC and Webb…those 11 definitely stay.

Doubtful they go with 13 pitchers…no need to.  Do they go with 11 pitchers or 12?  I would guess 12 but really it’s not necessary to have more than 8 relievers.

So, that leaves Povich or Bowman.  Povich gives you length but he also isn’t used to pitching out of the pen.

I think Povich is on the roster for the next series and he could even start game 1 but I think him being left off for this series is at least on the table.

I would think he gets the spot though.

You can’t ignore how he pitched against Detroit and the makeup of their roster. He has more value than even Suarez if that is who we end up playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HowAboutThat said:

Kremer is our #3 by default right now, and Suarez is arguably #3 anyway.

Im hoping Means will take a team friendly deal, but we still need two solid starters.

If/when we get them, we’ll figure something out, but let’s get them first.

regardless, Means/Wells/Bradish won’t be available until mid-season anyway, so, again, they can’t be counted on.

Well, I don't like to predict things on message boards but my prediction is we will not acquire two pitchers with a better Zips projection than Kremer. I would be more surprised by two than I would be by zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

You can’t ignore how he pitched against Detroit and the makeup of their roster. He has more value than even Suarez if that is who we end up playing.

I actually don’t disagree with you but you said there is no scenario he doesn’t make the team…I disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Well, I don't like to predict things on message boards but my prediction is we will not acquire two pitchers with a better Zips projection than Kremer. I would be more surprised by two than I would be by zero.

To be honest, I am inclined to agree with you, because I don’t get the sense that Elias works that way. I also don’t think he will get two Frontline pitchers.

I hope he will get one.

However, what he actually does doesn’t really change the fact that he should get  two.

And by Frontline, I mean someone Under 32 years old, with a career ERA plus of better than average, a career ERA under four, and a good ground ball rate. And I don’t care what his time to the plate is, with all due respect to buck.

I haven’t looked around to see what’s available, but when I do off-season shopping, it’s going to be at the Angels, the athletics, and the White Sox. Maybe the Mariners, who still need offense and who still have pitching.

Edited by HowAboutThat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, HowAboutThat said:

Isn’t the decision for third starter still undecided between Kremer and Suarez? It not I stand corrected, but the argument that Kremer is not really a #3 remains valid.

Personally, I’m tired of the whole game of assigning numbers to starting pitchers.   No two people seem to agree on what these numbers mean, and MANY people have a very unrealistic idea of what the third best starter on most teams (including most playoff teams) really looks like.  We’re in a world now where only 56 pitchers in MLB have thrown enough innings to qualify for the ERA title.  Only 55 pitchers have thrown 400 innings over the last three seasons combined.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Personally, I’m tired of the whole game of assigning numbers to starting pitchers.   No two people seem to agree on what these numbers mean, and MANY people have a very unrealistic idea of what the third best starter on most teams (including most playoff teams) really looks like.  We’re in a world now where only 56 pitchers in MLB have thrown enough innings to qualify for the ERA title.  Only 55 pitchers have thrown 400 innings over the last three seasons combined.   

Fair enough, although ranking pitchers as #1-#5 remains a pretty useful starting point.

Also, is Kremer a good choice for third-best starter in a five man rotation, with the fourth and fifth starters being less effective than he is?

If yes, that’s fine. I like Kremer. His career FIP is 4.49, career ERA+ is 94., and this season they were 4.32 and 92, so he’s been consistent.

it should be very easy to find his 2024 ranking but I couldn’t, but in almost exactly the same number of innings, Suarez has a 4.12 FIP and a 100 ERA+.
I worry about Suarez regressing, but I sure hope he’s back.

But for next year, I would prefer that Kremer not be the third best pitcher in the Rotation.

However,this is a far departure from who should start a playoff game 3. I would probably go with Kremer, but it’s close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
    • I can see the arguments for and against.  Gunnar may have had an opinion.  
    • I know I've been a Oriole critic these last few months but many of us have and deservedly so but congrats are really in order for a team that was decimated with injuries especially the pitching staff and still found a way to 90 wins and the playoffs. The first Orioles team with back to back 90 plus wins since the 1982, 1983  teams. Wow.  That's hard to believe. Also back to back playoff teams something the Machado, Jones, Markakis and Wieters led teams couldn't even pull off.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...