Jump to content

Maikol Hernandez: The classic example of Latin American Volatility


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, EdwinRip said:

Yet he continues to play everyday.  When will it end? 

I would guess after the draft when a bunch of new guys will get pumped into the system and a lot of cuts will be made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EdwinRip said:

Yet he continues to play everyday.  When will it end? 

Well, he's supposed to be a good defensive shortstop but he's been pretty brutal this year defensively too. At least he got a pretty big pay day and hopefully will be able to use that to better himself and his family, because the only reason he's still playing at all is because they invested so much money in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep taking swings but there will be a ton of failure.

That said, this stuff does illustrate that how much you spend on any one player isn’t really what’s important.  It’s that you are getting as many lottery tickets as possible and hoping to develop them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sad to say our International Pipeline has been really disappointing.  Basallo certainly seems like the best of the bunch and may become an impact player down the road.  Arias has shown some potential, and we have a few pitchers in the lower ranks of the minors showing some potential...  but the position prospects have by and large completely tanked....   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

yeah one flameout (or more) doesn't bother me one bit.  I'd rather see us fail w/ guys than not try at all, as I'm sure pretty much we all would agree.

Obviously you really didn't get the point of the thread if that is all you got out of it. I'll be honest, if that's the best you have to offer, please try and avoid quoting me in your replies as to not waste my time.

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Obviously you really didn't get the point of the thread if that is all you got out of it. I'll be honest, if that's the best you have to offer, please try and avoid quoting me in your replies as to not waste my time.

 

A. I didn't quote you, or anyone else, in my reply

B. What are you talking about?  I'm agreeing with you (and the post from SG that preceded my original post) that Hernandez is a flame out, that he won't be the last, and that its not a big deal because we're at least in the market.

 

I don't get what the issue is or what I didn't 'get' from the thread.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

I am sad to say our International Pipeline has been really disappointing.  Basallo certainly seems like the best of the bunch and may become an impact player down the road.  Arias has shown some potential, and we have a few pitchers in the lower ranks of the minors showing some potential...  but the position prospects have by and large completely tanked....   

Most of these kids are still 17 or 18, and the ones who have made it to full season ball have only been there for a couple of months.  A bit early for them to have 'completely tanked', no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony - given how woefully underinvested the O’s were before Elias, how are you assessing Perez to date?  He obviously was way behind the curve when he started, and it takes more time to develop international talent given the ages at which they’re signed, but it’s been 5 years and Basallo is the only big prospect to date.  Just feels like the O’s should be further along.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, btownoriole said:

Tony - given how woefully underinvested the O’s were before Elias, how are you assessing Perez to date?  He obviously was way behind the curve when he started, and it takes more time to develop international talent given the ages at which they’re signed, but it’s been 5 years and Basallo is the only big prospect to date.  Just feels like the O’s should be further along.  

Tony has Luis DeLeon in his top ten.  How often can you expect to produce a Basallo.  Chace and Portes are middling prospects at Aberdeen.   Our first really up-to-speed class was the Braylin Tavera class in 2022.  Sosa, Arias, and Tavera made the end-of-season FCL top 20 prospects.    Arias is doing well as a 19 yo at Delmarva.  Sosa is holding is own but has strong underlying metrics.  Tavera struggled and got injured but made consistent contact.   Hopefully he gets back and does what Arias and Aron Estrada have done, which is adjust after rough starts.  Speaking of Estrada, he's been on fire.  

Elis Cuevas, 19, also from that class, was leading the FCL in hitting as of Sunday and was top 5 in OPS.   Lots of other good stories. 

Think about it.  Basallo is 19 and came from Perez 2021 signing class when Perez was winging it and waiting for scraps, which is what Basallo was.  First deep class was 2022 and those guys are only 19 now.  How many top 100 prospects are 19?

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
    • LOL, I was worried last year about getting swept in four games by the Red Sox when the magic number for the division was 1. Part of being a fan is imagining the worst case scenario. I would agree it's not likely, though.
    • O's just need to win 1. O's lose home field if they go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0. I actually have no idea what happens if the O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0, and Royals go 3-0. They'd all be 88-74. O's have tiebreaker over the Royals, but not over the Tigers. Royals have the tiebreaker over the Tigers, but not the Orioles. lol Does anybody know what happens in that situation? Does it go to intradivision?  If so, here are their records intradivision: Orioles: 32-20 (.615)  in AL East Royals: 33-19 (.634) in AL Central Tigers: 27-22 in AL Central Interestingly enough, that loss against the Yankees now means the Royals have the intradivision tie breaker. So it does look like there are 2 scenarios where the O's don't get home field: O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0 OR O's go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0/Royals go 3-0. If the Tigers lose, doesn't matter what the Royals or O's do.  I think?
    • Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's. DH vs Skubal = Rivera
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...