Jump to content

Poll: Koshansky


ChaosLex

Should the O's be interested in Joe Koshansky?  

134 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the O's be interested in Joe Koshansky?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yes, along with every National League team plus Seattle, Detroit, Kansas City AND the Mighty Billy Beane's team the Oakland A's.

When something like this has you scratching your head, it usually means there's more to the story that we (posters) aren't aware of....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, along with every National League team plus Seattle, Detroit, Kansas City AND the Mighty Billy Beane's team the Oakland A's.

Last time I checked none of those teams are exactly hurting at 1B like the Orioles are...

Seattle has Carp and Clement, Detroit has Larish and Strieby, KC has Shealy, Butler, Kila, and so on. and the A's have Chris Carter and Sean Doolittle in the minors behind Giambi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why did the Rangers get him, I thought they had Justin "the last son of Krypton" Smoak?

They wanted an upgrade at AAA. Smoak is starting in AA but will be in AAA soon enough, and Koshansky could always slide to DH. And the Rangers apparently understand the need for depth at the IF positions as they are now stacked at every IF position especially 1B.

With the lack of power 1B bats in our system, there is no excuse to pass on Koshansky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand this at all. We're willing to give Pie a chance but not Koshansky. :confused:

There are only so many roster spots to give guys chances on. We've already got the market cornered on 1B/DH/Corner OF positions in AAA and on the MLB team. Reimold, Montanez and Salazar are in AAA. Obviously, MacPhail and Co. felt that Pie presents a much greater reward than Koshansky. If Koshansky is such a great prospect then why could Colorado not find room on their 40 man roster for him? Why hasn't he shown something by now, he is 27? We only have so much space on our 40 man, so who would you have eliminated from our roster to make room?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are only so many roster spots to give guys chances on. We've already got the market cornered on 1B/DH/Corner OF positions in AAA and on the MLB team. Reimold, Montanez and Salazar are in AAA. Obviously, MacPhail and Co. felt that Pie presents a much greater reward than Koshansky. If Koshansky is such a great prospect then why could Colorado not find room on their 40 man roster for him? Why hasn't he shown something by now, he is 27? We only have so much space on our 40 man, so who would you have eliminated from our roster to make room?

As I said in the other thread, Pauley and Waters could both go and we wouldn't miss them one bit. You can get arms like them any day. A bat like Koshanksy doesn't come available for the price of a waiver claim very often. The fact that the Rangers who are loaded at 1B grabbed him should tell you something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said in the other thread, Pauley and Waters could both go and we wouldn't miss them one bit. You can get arms like them any day. A bat like Koshanksy doesn't come available for the price of a waiver claim very often. The fact that the Rangers who are loaded at 1B grabbed him should tell you something...

Hahaha yeah, let's jettison a few more pitchers. God knows we won't need them this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I had such a crush on Nena in 1983-but I'm thinking  more Peter Pan?              
    • Suites and corporate partnerships have always been a massive part. They need those partnerships, suite sales, etc…always have.
    • In all the interviews with the front office folks, nothing makes me think they are tossing things out the window because of an organizational approach. Like Frobby said, approach hasn't change between the first half of the year and today, and I do not think the level of O's analytics is going to ignore obvious things like that. These are just not going to be things they haven't thought about before. I do worry some about defensive fundamentals which have been lacking since the Bobby Dickerson days, though I think that has nothing to do with analytics (which is more about positioning) and more to do with the fact that Dickerson was very good at his job and whoever is doing that work now is not as good.
    • I think one the best things that Elias brought to the team is having everyone on the same page.    The GM, Manager, Coaches both majors and minors leagues, the  players and the scouts.    That was  not where the O's were before Elias.   I think there is a real benefit to that. I think the problems with the O's can be summed up in a few words. 1) Injuries.    2) Breaking in rookies.   3) Fatigue  4)Pitchers not holding runners I think its a waste  of time to point out how many pitchers the O's have lost to a group on the OH.  Everyone knows.   And they know the pitching would be much better with all the O's pitchers healthy. Losing Westburg hurt the team on both sides the ball.  Gunnar has play 142 of the 144 games. 140 of those were at SS.   If Mateo was healthy during the dog days of summer would Gunnar have gotten a few days at DH that helped him get some rest?     You can say a lot of things about Hays but when he was in left the ball consistently and accurately was on target to 2nd base.   And the other team knew it and often did not run.  Cowser has a strong arm but the accuracy is a work in progress.   That is what happens when rookies are developed in the majors.     Holliday has the same rookie problem.  It will get better but it does affect the team, The offense is 2nd in the majors.   But what we are seeing in the 2nd half has a lot to do with fatigue. Both  Burnes and Kimbrel concentrate more on getting the hitters out and little on holding the runners.   And the other team takes advantage. For me looking at whether the current analytics based approach could use more old school in not really the point.    Any problems the O's have are more: 1) Injuries.    2) Breaking in rookies.   3) Fatigue  4) Pitchers not holding runners
    • It kind of burns me that the Rangers sandwiched a World Series win between two seasons when they were not even close to contention (and possibly below .500 in both).   Even the year they won, they weren't that good.   They just got on a heater when it mattered most.   
    • OHearn is playing too much though. His numbers since Aug 1 aren’t good.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...