Jump to content

I want to say this about Coby Mayo (All Inclusive)


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The logic is logistics. The taxi squad means they are already in the dugout. 

Also, not trying to give you a hard time. 

Was Soto actually up here as a taxi squad guy?  I suppose it's possible since he probably needed a physical etc.  I don't think Vavra was up, it seemed like they just let him red-eye it up here for 1 day before Holliday came up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

95mph from 55' is very different than 103mph from 110'.  

True.

I still say most fielders don't square up and  get in front of that ball.  Agree or disagree?

A ball hit that hard along with in an between hop is a do or die play where you just hope your glove is in the right spot.  Far from routine.  Agree or disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, StottyByNature said:

Urias isn't going to be the one standing in his way.  Once Westburg is back Urias will be the backup.  I don't think we want Mayo serving as the backup.  

For comparison, during the two weeks in April when Holliday was up and Westburg was healthy, Holliday started 10 games, Westburg started 13 games, and Henderson started 13 games.  In the meantime Urias only started 2 while coming in as a replacement in 4 others.  If we are replacing Urias with Mayo I don't think that's enough playing time.  The could try to get creative with the DH and 1B spots but again it's possible he could be sitting a lot.  Obviously a lot can happen between now and then, though.

Westburg is on the DL and won't be back for at least six weeks.  He doesn't figure into the conversation right now, in terms of getting Mayo at bats. 

Edited by ChuckS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

Ha! Good one Malike...Seriously, Im sure he'll struggle at first, but give him time. He can really rake.

Maybe he’ll struggle and maybe he won’t.  It’s a fallacy that all rookies struggle at first.   Plenty don’t.   But I certainly won’t freak out if Mayo does.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

True.

I still say most fielders don't square up and  get in front of that ball.  Agree or disagree?

A ball hit that hard along with in an between hop is a do or die play where you just hope your glove is in the right spot.  Far from routine.  Agree or disagree?

100% agree it's far from routine.  That ball was smoked.

  I do think he makes that play like 80+% of the time, though and if it was at OPACY he likely gets an E. 

Agree most guys won't get in front and throw their body at it. 

I didn't like that he got out of the way and 'spun out' with glove flying up.  I get the drop step back hand, but he's gotta get low and keep his eyes behind his glove.  He stepped back for the backhand and just flailed at it.  I thought it was a lazy attempt on an extremely difficult play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The need for a backup shortstop was a bit overstated all along in my opinion.  Gunnar doesn't really take days or even innings off.

Is there a #23 on the team that I'm forgetting about?  I think that's been Mayo's number throughout the minors, a little surprised he's not getting that in the majors.  Instead he gets Trey's old number.  May he wear it with just as much class as Trey did!

The Soto thing is certainly odd.  The only explanation must be the RFF - Roy Firestone Factor!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Perhaps the production and release of that hype video was the reason for the delay....

I doubt that. Have to imagine they have those things in the hopper for the big prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...