Jump to content

Power Rankings ,,,,,, O’s #1


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Surhoffan17 said:

First year I paid attention - I was only 6 - but what a great intro to the O's!

It was brutal. They had been as much as 10 GB of the Red Sox, went on a 13-6 stretch while BOS struggled. In the game that started the collapse they were up 11-6 at home against the Rangers, and Rich Bordi gave up 6 runs in the 8th and eventually lost 13-11. The following day they blew an 8-4 lead, losing 9-8. They were a completely different team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jagwar said:

It was brutal. They had been as much as 10 GB of the Red Sox, went on a 13-6 stretch while BOS struggled. In the game that started the collapse they were up 11-6 at home against the Rangers, and Rich Bordi gave up 6 runs in the 8th and eventually lost 13-11. The following day they blew an 8-4 lead, losing 9-8. They were a completely different team

I am almost positive that I was supposed to go to that game against Texas but it was raining so my parents decided to take me another time (which the O's won but were basically out at that point). Were there rain delays do you know? 

Edited by Surhoffan17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Surhoffan17 said:

I am almost positive that I was supposed to go to that game against Texas but it was raining so my parents decided to take me another time (which the O's won but were basically out at that point). Were there rain delays do you know? 

I honestly don't remember, perhaps someone else can dig into the vault to verify?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...