Jump to content

What is the O's magic number for home field advantage for the 1st round of the playoffs?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RVAOsFan said:

Would be nice to get that home field advantage locked up so we can start lining up the starters for the WC series.  Burnes starting tomorrow night, I don't know if giving him a short start or skipping him all together would be more beneficial. 

Are you suggesting that if we were in the playoffs but still fighting for home field advantage, that we would somehow not line up our pitching to give us the best shot in the playoffs regardless of where we were playing.  At this point, any team that's in, regardless of where they will play, should be lining up their best starters to be pitching in the first games of the playoffs.

And, while I am not optimistic about our chances in the playoffs because of our inconsistent hitting and questionable bullpen, I am much happier that we don't have a bye this year, as it did us no favors last year.  We finished the regular season flat last year, had a week off, and never got anything going in the playoffs.

My biggest hope right now is that, maybe with the pressure now being off, guys will loosen up and start playing better, and have it carry over into the post-season.   They've been way too tight lately, and maybe not having to win will result in better results.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, casadeozo said:

So what needs to happen so we avoid the Tigers in the WC round. They have owned us the past 2 weeks and they just called up Jobe to be another arm we can’t hit. 

They were set up to sweep them in Baltimore, I'm not afraid of the Tigers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

Are you suggesting that if we were in the playoffs but still fighting for home field advantage, that we would somehow not line up our pitching to give us the best shot in the playoffs regardless of where we were playing.  At this point, any team that's in, regardless of where they will play, should be lining up their best starters to be pitching in the first games of the playoffs.

And, while I am not optimistic about our chances in the playoffs because of our inconsistent hitting and questionable bullpen, I am much happier that we don't have a bye this year, as it did us no favors last year.  We finished the regular season flat last year, had a week off, and never got anything going in the playoffs.

My biggest hope right now is that, maybe with the pressure now being off, guys will loosen up and start playing better, and have it carry over into the post-season.   They've been way too tight lately, and maybe not having to win will result in better results.

I do think that home field advantage is important but we should have our best starters available for the WC Series.  With Burnes scheduled to start tomorrow night that puts him on 4 days rest for WC opener.  If we clinch home field tonight would it make more sense to skip Burnes start all together and let him rest up for WC start or give him a shorter start to avoid getting rusty?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

I do think that home field advantage is important but we should have our best starters available for the WC Series.  With Burnes scheduled to start tomorrow night that puts him on 4 days rest for WC opener.  If we clinch home field tonight would it make more sense to skip Burnes start all together and let him rest up for WC start or give him a shorter start to avoid getting rusty?

I’d skip his start and have him throw a bullpen session in between. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no reason for Burnes to skip a start this week; if he was due this weekend, it would of course be a different story.  But him throwing tonight/tomorrow keeps him on a regular routine, which is more valuable than extra rest for a P of his caliber.

And if you want 5 days rest for your WC starters instead of 4, just flip flop Eflin and Burnes for Games 1 and 2.  Eflin would be on 5 on Tuesday, and Burnes 5 on Wednesday.  They are both clearly starting those games, does it really matter that much who goes first?  This allows one extra day of rest, with neither of them missing a start on the way to clinching home field for that series. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...