Jump to content

DH - O'Hearn v. Kjerstad


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Quote
2 minutes ago, dzorange said:

I don’t know why we wouldn’t expect Hyde to platoon O’Hearn with whoever.

 

 

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Back on point: O’Hearn hasn’t hit well in the second half, but he’s earned the right to start at DH vs. RHP with his play the last two years.   

+1. Agreed, O'Hearn starts at 1B vs RHP, Mountcastle pinch hits at first opportunity and/or subs for defense with the lead. If either look overmatched in the first couple games, maybe go with RMC and slide O'Hearn or Kjerstad to the bench. 

Current A-team lineup vs RHP something like this:

SS Gunnar

2B Westburg

RF Santander

DH Kjerstad

C Adley

LF Cowser

1B O'Hearn

3B Urias

CF Mullins

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think that depends on McCann.

If he's willing to come back in a backup catcher role, making veteran backup catcher money I think he can find a job.

He's an above replacement level backup catcher, teams would be interested.

He's banked over 50M, he might not think it's worth it to come back for that.

Yes, bring him back. If the plan goes right, we need him for one more year till Basallo is ready to come up and split time with Adley. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Back on point: O’Hearn hasn’t hit well in the second half, but he’s earned the right to start at DH vs. RHP with his play the last two years.   

Agreed......Adley should not be DHing right now anyway.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Honestly, I’d rather have McCann catch Burnes and DH Adley. Heck, maybe the same for Eflin too. Adley’s pitch receiving has been terrible. In the playoffs, you need all the close calls you can get. 

If we play KC you will need who throws out runners the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

 

+1. Agreed, O'Hearn starts at 1B vs RHP, Mountcastle pinch hits at first opportunity and/or subs for defense with the lead. If either look overmatched in the first couple games, maybe go with RMC and slide O'Hearn or Kjerstad to the bench. 

Current A-team lineup vs RHP something like this:

SS Gunnar

2B Westburg

RF Santander

DH Kjerstad

C Adley

LF Cowser

1B O'Hearn

3B Urias

CF Mullins

 

+2 This is what I would do - at least for the playoffs.  Mountcastle has a career 104 wRC+ against RHP and a 98 wRC+ this year. Both O’Hearn and Kjerstad project to be significantly better vs RHP.  Let Mounty mash lefties.

I might give Mounty some more at bats over the last 4 games as part of his “rehab”, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Frobby said:

If you buy the Statcast metrics, Adley is -4 framing runs, McCann is -5 in fewer games.   How is McCann an upgrade?   Meanwhile, Adley is +11 blocking while McCann is -5.  Adley is +1 throwing and McCann is -1.  

Did you see the thing Jomboy did on Adley for that Mets game?  Let me see if I can find it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Frobby this is a good watch. Whatever your thoughts and opinions are on Jomboy, idk. I think he does a good job pointing out Adley’s issues receiving.

Take it FWIW. 

So if McCann gets us more calls than Adley then I’ll take that in the playoffs. 

McCann’s Catching + Adley hitting better as a DH > Adley Carching + whatever we get from DH in O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad. JMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Frobby said:

Back on point: O’Hearn hasn’t hit well in the second half, but he’s earned the right to start at DH vs. RHP with his play the last two years.   

There’s no earned the right in the playoffs. He earned the right to get himself together at the end of the season. He hasn’t done that (.535 OPS the last 30 games). You play the guys who give you the best chance to win (Mounty at 1B and Kjerstad at DH)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

There’s no earned the right in the playoffs. He earned the right to get himself together at the end of the season. He hasn’t done that (.535 OPS the last 30 games). You play the guys who give you the best chance to win (Mounty at 1B and Kjerstad at DH)

This is my point. Have Mounty or O’Hearn both hit so well that they are just plays at 1B and DH?  I think not. I’d rather roll with the chemistry that Burnes and McCann have, and Adley DH. Adley hits better as a DH. 

We’ll see what happens. Our offense has been struggling. I say let’s roll with run prevention and McCann. Let Burnes throw to his guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...