Jump to content

Starters vs Minnesota?


Wavetrapper

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Wavetrapper said:

Slater first choice 

Rather have Kjerstad bat vs Slater glove.  
 

Holliday second choice 

You are probably going to want Slater to start vs Skubal over Kjerstad.   Skubal holds LH hitters to a .186 average / .486 OPS.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SteveA said:

You are probably going to want Slater to start vs Skubal over Kjerstad.   Skubal holds LH hitters to a .186 average / .486 OPS.  

Good information.  I would agree for sure if it was a one game series.  Assuming the series goes 3 games, would you keep Slater over Kjerstad?  
 

I guess if we are prioritizing RH bats, then I’d drop Holliday.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wavetrapper said:

Good information.  I would agree for sure if it was a one game series.  Assuming the series goes 3 games, would you keep Slater over Kjerstad?  
 

I guess if we are prioritizing RH bats, then I’d drop Holliday.  

I think there's room to keep both.   Shed some bad bullpen arms like Baker and Bowman.   Either Rivera or Gregory Soto can go.   So even if you add McDermott you can keep both Slater and Kjerstad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about Rivera,  but I figured his ability to play two positions would keep him around. 
 

It will be interesting to see what they decide.  
 

One of the non-pitchers will need to be left off as I understand it.     13 max    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

You are probably going to want Slater to start vs Skubal over Kjerstad.   Skubal holds LH hitters to a .186 average / .486 OPS.  

Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's.

DH vs Skubal = Rivera

Edited by CP0861
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

You are probably going to want Slater to start vs Skubal over Kjerstad.   Skubal holds LH hitters to a .186 average / .486 OPS.  

I guess the question is do you believe in Skubal's splits or Slater's splits?

Slater is worse against lefties this year (188 AVG, 541 OPS), which is about in line with how Skubal holds LHH. Historically he's better against lefties than he's shown this year, but historically he's been better than he's been this year (which is, well, bad). I just don't think we can put any weight on Slater's previous years of "prowess" against lefties when this year he's been just bad overall, but even worse against lefties. 

Obviously an extremely SSS for Kjerstad this year, but against lefties he's been better: 375/813 OPS, albeit in only 16 PA. 

It's a tough matchup either way. But Slater has fallen off a cliff lately. 

To me it's not a question of offense, though. I'd put Kjerstad in there every single time over Slater if that was the question. It's more on the defensive side of things. I reckon you're going to want a pristine game defensively.

To that end, Slater is just a better defensive player. So, I'd begrudgingly give him the nod and have the OF alignment be Slater, Cowser, Santander. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...