Jump to content

The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen


Roy Firestone

Recommended Posts

Wishing there was a better stat for relievers.  ERA is very misleading.   Coming in with 2 runners on and giving up a bases clearing double….yay, the ERA wasn’t impacted.   
 

We just have so many guys in the bullpen who are sub MLB quality, it’s ridiculous.  I struggle at times wondering which guys are worth retaining at all.  
 

Baker needs to be off the roster immediately.   Useless 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Wavetrapper said:

Wishing there was a better stat for relievers.  ERA is very misleading.   Coming in with 2 runners on and giving up a bases clearing double….yay, the ERA wasn’t impacted.   
 

We just have so many guys in the bullpen who are sub MLB quality, it’s ridiculous.  I struggle at times wondering which guys are worth retaining at all.  
 

Baker needs to be off the roster immediately.   Useless 

WPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Wavetrapper said:

Wishing there was a better stat for relievers.  ERA is very misleading.   Coming in with 2 runners on and giving up a bases clearing double….yay, the ERA wasn’t impacted.   
 

We just have so many guys in the bullpen who are sub MLB quality, it’s ridiculous.  I struggle at times wondering which guys are worth retaining at all.  
 

Baker needs to be off the roster immediately.   Useless 

That 1/3 of an inning against Texas in Game 3 was the low point of my 2023 season. He's only here to eat innings, He was only in to throw garbage time. Wont be on the playoff roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  

DC should get the highest leverage situation that pops up, regardless of the inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Wavetrapper said:

Wishing there was a better stat for relievers.  ERA is very misleading.   Coming in with 2 runners on and giving up a bases clearing double….yay, the ERA wasn’t impacted.

There’s all kinds of other statistics if you don’t want to use ERA.  Relevant to your comment, Orioles relievers have allowed 32% of inherited runners to score.  League average is 33%.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  

If you have to go to the pen at that point, I’m probably going with Akin there assuming Coulombe gets that spot in the lineup in the 9th. Soto has been pitching better than Perez too, so I’m probably going with him over Perez right now. They both have severe walk issues but Soto at least strikes guys out.

Depends who is hitting behind that batter too though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LGOrioles said:

If you have to go to the pen at that point, I’m probably going with Akin there assuming Coulombe gets that spot in the lineup in the 9th. Soto has been pitching better than Perez too, so I’m probably going with him over Perez right now. They both have severe walk issues but Soto at least strikes guys out.

Depends who is hitting behind that batter too though. 

I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez.

Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault. 

This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.

There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez.

Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault. 

This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.

Soto has been fine since his first couple appearances and appears to be picking up steam. That makes seven. Problem is Cano has been the most reliable and all of a sudden looked terrible twice in a row. Hopefully he can get in one decent appearance in the final series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez.

Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault. 

This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.

Soto makes 8 and must be included. Dont get the love for Povich because dont see how he fits on the WC roster, especially if he does his job tonight. If they go with a 9 man pen.I think It,s Bowman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...