Jump to content

The trials and tribulations of Andy LaRoche


Recommended Posts

If you thought Felix Pie was having a rough time winning over certain skeptics on the OH, you should take a long look at what's been happening with Andy LaRoche since coming to Pittsburgh.

After arriving in August of last year as one of the central pieces of the Jason Bay trade, LaRoche authored a gruesome .152/.227/.232 line over 183 plate appearances. Not to worry, Pirates fans were told: he was nursing an injured thumb at the time, and was also a victim of ridiculously crappy luck (.177 BABIP). Even with Pedro Alvarez (who will almost certainly make the switch to 1B at some point) in the fold, LaRoche was still several magnitudes superior to organizational fodder like Neil Walker, a local western PA kid with not a whole lot other than his local-ness going for him. Over the offseason, GM Neil Huntington announced that the 3B job belonged to LaRoche, which didn't sit well with a number of fans.

Huntington's faith in LaRoche seemed fully warranted in spring training, where he performed very well: .333/.453/.471 with 2 HRs and 11BBs. There were some qualms over him neglecting daily exercises for a protruding disc, but all in all, I think most critics were reconciled with at the very least wiping the slate clean for 2009.

As if to singlehandedly prove the meaningless of spring training stats, LaRoche has started the season 0-16 with one walk, and has looked just as lost in the field (3 Es in 17 chances). After starting the first two games in St. Louis, manager John Russell has given 4 of 6 starts to Ramon Vasquez at third. The local media and fans have been simply brutal — case in point, in last night's loss at PNC Park to Houston, LaRoche was pulled in the 6th inning as part of a double-switch, and was replaced in the field by Luis Cruz. But because all players were wearing the #42 last night in honor of Jackie Robinson, the change went largely unnoticed; when Cruz dropped a simple pop-up that inning, people in the stands (and the pressbox!) were howling for LaRoche's immediate benching. It was an ugly, embarrassing display.

Presuming he's healthy, LaRoche needs to be getting the same shot that Pie's getting in Baltimore, but Russell's handling of him over the first 10 days of the season suggests to me that the organization may have already given up on him. There's no denying that he just looks completely lost and dejected right now, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if he joined the ranks of Dallas MacPherson and Andy Marte as an eminent 3B-prospect-bust-turned-journeyman. I hope I'm wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Just add Mayo and Cowser to your list and the roster makes sense.
    • Let's look at the roster requirements.  The active MLB roster allows 26 players. Now do we have 4 outfielders or 5? I would assume we keep at least 13 pitchers with 8 of those in the bullpen. So that would leave 13 position players at best. 2 Catchers, 2 1Bmen, + Gunnar/Mateo/Urias/Westburg as IF utility. So that's 8 infielders all practically guaranteed to make the team from seniority on 2 winning Orioles teams, plus the 3 starting outfielders in Hays/Mullins/Santander. What we have are likely 2 outfield positions, with one of those possibly being another infield uitlity player, but maybe not probable. If they have 2 bench outfielders then at least one of those is probably preferred to be a left handed batter and the other probably to be a right handed batter. They might also want someone who has the skills to play centerfield, unless the scenario that either Mateo or Hays is thought to be the primary backup center-fielder. Which could be a very good idea in order to allow a corner outfielder on the roster.
    • How so? They knew Bradish had a season-threatening injury a month before the trade with Milwaukee, and that Burnes was therefore just filling a hole rather than serving as a true addition to the rotation. ...who merely replaced the incumbent ace of the staff, who may not pitch at all for us in 2024. No real upgrade has actually occurred.  
    • I have to say, if we’re still at a point where signing some SP5 has to be contingent in any way on dumping $3.5M of Ryan O’Hearn — that would be so very disheartening.  I get why folks want to see Kjerstad over O’Hearn. We all want to see Kjerstad. We all want to see the very exciting all-homegrown-prospect lineups we’ve been pontificating about ad nauseum for years now.  But we’re trying to win it all this season, and O’Hearn had a higher wRC+ in the bigs last year than Kjerstad did in AAA. Just dumping a guy who was a critical part of the lineup last year on blind faith seems a bit rash. And unnecessary.  Maybe O’Hearn regresses to his pre-2023 form. Maybe Kjerstad absolutely rakes. The nice thing is, we have the luxury of letting it all play out. It’s a very long season. If O’Hearn hits his way off the team — or Kjerstad hits his way onto it — then great. That’s a miscalculation we can easily (and happily) correct. But if you ship O’Hearn out and then Kjerstad can’t hack it (or gets hurt, that’s much tougher to un-do. 
    • I love the sound of that crack of the bat. It means spring is almost here!
    • Thanks for this. I was actually thinking earlier while browsing the message board that I wanted to follow Hall and was thinking about looking up his stat page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...