Jump to content

Round 5 Selection: Ashur Tolliver LHP


Recommended Posts

Ashur Tolliver, LHP

NAIA power Oklahoma City usually has an interesting NCAA Division I transfer, and this year's prospect is Tolliver. He went just 2-5, 7.94 at Arkansas-Little Rock in 2008, but started to blossom in the Cape Cod League during the summer. He drew a lot of attention when his fastball sat in the low 90s and popped some 96s early in the spring, though he was working more at 88-92 mph as the draft approached. Scouts wonder about his durability because he's generously listed at 6 feet and 170 pounds. He has a very quick arm, though there's also effort in his delivery, and he ultimately may wind up in the bullpen. Tolliver's second-best pitch currently is his changeup. He showed some feel for a curveball in the fall but now employs a slurvy slider in the low 80s. He has a chance to become the highest-drafted player in Stars history, surpassing Grant Hansen, who went 89th overall to the White Sox in 2003. But Tolliver didn't help his chances by giving up eight runs in three innings against Louisiana State-Shreveport in the first round of the NAIA playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ashur Tolliver, LHP

NAIA power Oklahoma City usually has an interesting NCAA Division I transfer, and this year's prospect is Tolliver. He went just 2-5, 7.94 at Arkansas-Little Rock in 2008, but started to blossom in the Cape Cod League during the summer. He drew a lot of attention when his fastball sat in the low 90s and popped some 96s early in the spring, though he was working more at 88-92 mph as the draft approached. Scouts wonder about his durability because he's generously listed at 6 feet and 170 pounds. He has a very quick arm, though there's also effort in his delivery, and he ultimately may wind up in the bullpen. Tolliver's second-best pitch currently is his changeup. He showed some feel for a curveball in the fall but now employs a slurvy slider in the low 80s. He has a chance to become the highest-drafted player in Stars history, surpassing Grant Hansen, who went 89th overall to the White Sox in 2003. But Tolliver didn't help his chances by giving up eight runs in three innings against Louisiana State-Shreveport in the first round of the NAIA playoffs.

Hey Moose, you post the pick and then I'll try to post something about them. That way we don't duplicate our efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ashur Tolliver, LHP

NAIA power Oklahoma City usually has an interesting NCAA Division I transfer, and this year's prospect is Tolliver. He went just 2-5, 7.94 at Arkansas-Little Rock in 2008, but started to blossom in the Cape Cod League during the summer. He drew a lot of attention when his fastball sat in the low 90s and popped some 96s early in the spring, though he was working more at 88-92 mph as the draft approached. Scouts wonder about his durability because he's generously listed at 6 feet and 170 pounds. He has a very quick arm, though there's also effort in his delivery, and he ultimately may wind up in the bullpen. Tolliver's second-best pitch currently is his changeup. He showed some feel for a curveball in the fall but now employs a slurvy slider in the low 80s. He has a chance to become the highest-drafted player in Stars history, surpassing Grant Hansen, who went 89th overall to the White Sox in 2003. But Tolliver didn't help his chances by giving up eight runs in three innings against Louisiana State-Shreveport in the first round of the NAIA playoffs.

Hey Moose, you post the pick and then I'll try to post something about them. That way we don't duplicate our efforts.

Sounds good dude, though I'm not sure how long I'll be able to shirk my work responsibilities. :)

10-1 3.74 era, 74.2 innings 17 walks 89 k's, gave up 12 homers!

Well he should fit right in ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy intrigues me. Think Tim Lincecum a year before he blew up. He's about the same build, he's tiny, but he pitched in a wood bat league in VA last summer and looked amazing. Supposedly a fastball-changeup guy great at changing speeds, he threw a pitch that looked like a slurve that dropped off the table about a 2 feet in front of the plate and every hitter in the dugout dropped their jaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy intrigues me. Think Tim Lincecum a year before he blew up. He's about the same build, he's tiny, but he pitched in a wood bat league in VA last summer and looked amazing. Supposedly a fastball-changeup guy great at changing speeds, he threw a pitch that looked like a slurve that dropped off the table about a 2 feet in front of the plate and every hitter in the dugout dropped their jaws.

If he can be more consistent with his slurve, that would make a 3rd above average-plus pitch....I gotta like his potential......

I hope everyone here realizes that we are taking excellent pitching prospects, they just arent the big names, but to me they have similar upside if not better....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • They are definitely going to do some extensions. That is what is best for business and competitiveness. Only an egomaniac would believe that superstar talent is easy to replace. And Elias doesn't strike me as that. And Rubenstein doesn't appear to be a bad businessman. Gotta have stars to market if you want to maximize engagement within your fanbase. Gunnar Hendersons don't just grow on trees.
    • No it doesn’t.  Needing additional development and being rushed are 2 different things. And btw, that additional development could happen at this level.
    • LOL at Verducci trying to pigeon hole a “type” preference when (at least for the talked about guys) there seems to be variance in selections.  The not drafting HS arms high in draft is not unique. Gunnar, Holliday = HS athletes Adley = catcher unicorn Cowser, Kjerstad, Westburg, Norby = bat first college guys (at time of draft) Beavers, Fabian = college athlete with known swing holes Bradfield = speed and defense college guy Mayo = bat first HS Im struggling to see any pattern there.  Now where Os do seem to have biases come later in draft with college bat profiles and college arm profiles but those guys are lower in system and prospect lists for now.  
    • I think there are numerous examples of players coming up and struggling, then getting sent back to Triple A to work on things and coming up different players. Whether you want call that something other than rushed, "not ready" or "in need of more development", I won't argue semantics  Now maybe they need that to experience that failure in the majors sometimes to know what they need to go back down and work on.   That could be a valid point to make.  But saying that there is no such thing as rushed takes the possibility for additional development that could have occurred in the minor leagues, out of the equation.  
    • Overwhelmingly, players career years is at age 26. He's already 25, yes he can be a late bloomer but remember most great prospects come up at ages 20-23. Holidays got 5 years on him.
    • I think you'd see a much stronger correlation to how they were rated in the minors vs. draft position. Westburg has been treated similarly to Cowser and Kjerstad. Adley, Gunnar and Holliday were all consensus #1 prospects and have been given pretty much immediate every day player status.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...