Jump to content

Liz hits 102MPH!


WhoRU

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I can't believe that I'm reading posts that claim that Guidry threw 102 mph or even close to it. I guess people can truly say anything they want on a message board.

If that's the case, then I guess Nolan Ryan threw comfortably in the 105 mph range and JR Richard routinely hit 110 mph.

(Anyone who cannot detect the sarcasm in the above statement can pm me about a terrific pyramid scheme that I'm familiar with. You just need to wire transfer a small fee to me and I will send you the materials to get started.)

Back to the topic of Liz. It's great that he's developing and throws hard.

But why would anyone get so excited about Liz registering 102 on a radar gun? People should know that radar guns can be inexact. Even if he did legitimately hit 102 mph, so what? Unless he is regularly touching 99-100 mph, it doesn't really mean squat, besides the fact that he throws hard. And we already knew that he throws hard.

I hope people aren't expecting Liz to just come up to the show and routinely reach back to blow 100 mph fastballs by batters in key situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can remember since I was a little kid and reading Baseball Digest that Ron Guidry had been clocked at over 101. I can't remember the exact decimal point but was near 102 at some point in his career.

I don't ever remember anyone saying Ryan threw 105 either. I think in his best year it was around 100 also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Anyone who cannot detect the sarcasm in the above statement can pm me about a terrific pyramid scheme that I'm familiar with. You just need to wire transfer a small fee to me and I will send you the materials to get started.)
I don't ever remember anyone saying Ryan threw 105 either. I think in his best year it was around 100 also.

I can't believe these are two consecutive posts. Hysterical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Neyer-James Guide to Pitchers has an article entitled "The Best Fastballs of Each Half Decade."

Here's the 1975-79 entry:

1. Nolan Ryan

2. Goose Gossage

3. Frank Tanana

4. Ron Guidry

5. JR Richard

It's Guidry's only appearance in these lists.

In his entry in the individual player section later on it's noted that he was a fastball/slider pitcher. There's a few sentences saying he had one of the best sliders in the game, but no description of his fastball at all. Seems odd that a near-record velocity fastball would go unnoticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also, he was struck by lightning.
At thirty he married an English girl, daughter of Jerome Dunn, the alpinist, and granddaughter of two Dorset parsons, experts in obscure subjects--paleopedology and Aeolian harps, respectively. My very photogenic mother died in a freak accident (picnic, lightning) when I was three, and, save for a pocket of warmth in the darkest past, nothing of her subsists within the hollows and dells of memory, over which, if you can still stand my style (I am writing under observation), the sun of my infancy had set: surely, you all know those redolent remnants of day suspended, with the midges, about some hedge in bloom or suddenly entered and traversed by the rambler, at the bottom of a hill, in the summer dusk; a furry warmth, golden midges.

What a great book. http://www.randomhouse.com/features/nabokov/lo_excerpt.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Neyer-James Guide to Pitchers has an article entitled "The Best Fastballs of Each Half Decade."

Here's the 1975-79 entry:

1. Nolan Ryan

2. Goose Gossage

3. Frank Tanana

4. Ron Guidry

5. JR Richard

It's Guidry's only appearance in these lists.

In his entry in the individual player section later on it's noted that he was a fastball/slider pitcher. There's a few sentences saying he had one of the best sliders in the game, but no description of his fastball at all. Seems odd that a near-record velocity fastball would go unnoticed.

Guidry had a GREAT fastball - but great in the 95-97 mph range from what I've read (and barely recall). I always thought he was known for the slider, too.

Is Guidry a decent comp for Bedard? I hope not - he was actually slighter. And that slider had to take a toll. I much prefer Bedard's curve (and think he'll age better because of it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke to two scouts that were doing the game yesterday and they said that the 102 MPH Liz fastball was actually 98 MPH on the scouts' guns. Liz seemed to max out last night at 98 on the STALKER SPORT radar guns.

I'll take 98 from a starter.

Or reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke to two scouts that were doing the game yesterday and they said that the 102 MPH Liz fastball was actually 98 MPH on the scouts' guns. Liz seemed to max out last night at 98 on the STALKER SPORT radar guns.

Radhames said that while he hit 100 in Altoona earlier this season the PG Stadium gun is a little inconsistent with the scouts' guns. Still an impressive feat to hit the upper 90's as often as he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the topic of Liz. It's great that he's developing and throws hard. But why would anyone get so excited about Liz registering 102 on a radar gun?

The post in the tracker was that the pitch was clocked at 102, immediately followed by a breaking ball/changeup at 85. This, I think, was what I personally was excited about. Still, it was impressive to see the 102.

But if we're talking about 98 (as pointed out by BowieMike when he asked the scouts about their readings), then we're also talking about 81 - which is still a sweet 17 mph differential. He also threw the fastball, changeup, and a slider effectively Monday night. Good signs, I think, of the progress he's making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but Guidry wasn't ever anywhere near the strikeout pitcher Bedrad has been this year, and its not like EB is getting by with much better location than Guidry.

There are a lot more factors to pitching than the speed of a fastball and location. This comparison discussion has really gone south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot more factors to pitching than the speed of a fastball and location. This comparison discussion has really gone south.

I'm not sure why you are responding to me, but I know. As you said in the post I replied to:

Guidry had probably the nastiest stuff I've ever seen - along with Vida Blue, Dwight Gooden, and Randy Johnson. It's not a knock on Bedard at all, but Guidry's stuff (in his prime) was in a class far above Bedard's.

Guidry definitely walked fewer batters, so presumably he had better control. Maybe Guidry had better stuff too, perhaps even "in a class far above Bedard's" and there is something more than stuff + control that is more important than the two, but Guidry never had a season where he came close to striking out batters like EB has this year (3 K/9 less), although K rates in general were down in 1978 so its closer than it first looks when you think about where they are vis-a-vie the league - but EB still shines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • He allowed only one batted ball over 95 MPH, commanding his cutter particularly well in this one. I think the cutter is the most critical pitch for Povich to take the next step. He’s never had issues getting punch outs, he needs to be able to pitch in the zone without relying too much on his fastball. It’s also a key weapon against RHP - if you don’t have a true plus breaking ball or fastball that can overcome the platoon splits (which I don’t think Povich does), you can only make it as a LHP SP through the strength of your cutter and changeup, which are more reverse/neutral splits.  His changeup is probably not good enough to carry him on its own, so it’s the cutter that brings the whole pitch mix together.  
    • Agree he steps in the bucket. In theory should be a relatively easy fix. 
    • His back or shoulder might give out first. Hardly any talented pitcher retires without some sort of serious injury recorded.
    • Plus Member  30.8k Posted January 24 Aram Leighton from Just Baseball on Holliday “He has the tendency to pull off of the ball a bit with his front side, which can minimize his ability to use the ground and his lower half to generate more power, especially on pitches on the outer half. The move does not impede his ability to consistently make contact thanks to his adjustability and feel for the barrel. Holliday projects as an easy plus hitter with more juice to tap into.“ https://www.justbaseball.com/prospects/baltimore-orioles-top-15-prospects-for-2024/
    • I guess my point is that the difference between 91 and 93 at the MLB level is probably negligible.  I would put significant emphasis on pitch sequencing, command and control, and the ability to land his secondary pitches.  If I am recalling his repertoire correctly his most important pitch is his change up.  And it was his ability to effectively throw a breaking pitch, I think it was a Slider, that really ushered in his pre-injury success.  Now you can make the case that 2 miles per hours of fastball velocity may make the change up an even more effective pitch.  I would not argue with you about that aspect, however I am not certain it explains much about his previous success.
    • From a thread in early January titled “Breaking down Jackson Holliday’s Swing”    January 4 Makes sense but I can’t think of many, if any, ML hitters who step like that with their lead foot.  It doesn’t look good to me but who can argue with the results?     Quote    
    • As long as it's never for the O's I'm happy to see him learning new skills. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...