Jump to content

MacPhail on Hobgood


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't know if we should make a poll for this, but after 3 months of Matusz, and comparing him to the other guys Trea brought up, would you rather a Matusz, a potential #1 starter or someone like Smoak, a potential GG power-hitting positional player?

This goes out to everyone.

I'd take the #1 starter hands-down. Matusz is cleaning up in the minors.

PITCHING and DEFENSE!!!! Wins every time. We beat Hamels 2-1!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hobgood won't be a factor on the MLB level until at least '13 and that's if he is rushed. Everyone should give him a chance to develop and grow.

Jordan has done pretty good with his pitching picks lately.

Your saying if he is in the minors for 4 years he is being rushed? There is no sense in using generalizations when developing prospects. Every kid is different, some will develop quicker than others. He may be ready in 3 years or even less. He is said to be fairly advanced for a prep arm, and to be completely honest, I expect him to move pretty quickly thro the minors. Its not about the amount of time the prospect spends in certain levels, its about how much they develop while there. Maybe he dominates this year in Bluefield and Aberdeen, kicks off next year with Delmarva and dominates there and they jump him up to Fredrick by the end of 2010. From there he only has 2 levels to the majors, not saying this will happen, but could happen....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Its not like it isnt true.....If you dont want to read about baseball cliches then you are on the wrong website....

Of course it's not true. Sometimes good hitting beats good pitching, and sometimes bad hitting beats good pitching, and sometimes bad pitching beats good hitting. Building a winning ballclub can't be reduced to "pitching wins" or "pitching, defense and the three run homer" or everyone would follow the same model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by McLovin View Post

Hey guess what - Markakis was scorned as a 'signability' pick. I remember people freaking out because we didn't pick the great Michael Aubrey.

Well wouldn't you know, we just acquired Michael Aubrey

http://castrovince.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/06/aubrey_to_the_os.html

Pretty freakin' scary - McLovin the Orioles now have both - you called it (though obviously, inadvertently). :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, inquiring minds want to know. In 2003... how did BA rank him and did the Orioles pass over him? I mean, come on, he's a lefty, he's a 1B'man, he's made for Camden Yards!

;)

Ya know, maybe one day in 2015 we will acquire some AAAA pitcher named Tyler Matzek......And then people will say, "I remember when we passed over him to get Hobgood, boy was I wrong".......Of course no one thinks Matzek will end up AAAA fodder, but Im sure in 2003 no one expected this guy to be AAAA fodder either.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Hobgood is the USA Today High School player of the year...then that is good enough for me, and is proof enough to me. I like the pick, I think Jordan knows more than anyone on this board, and I am going to reserve judgement on this draft pick until at least 2 years down the road. To try and pick this draft apart now is an exercise in futility and is pretty insane if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Hobgood is the USA Today High School player of the year...then that is good enough for me, and is proof enough to me. I like the pick, I think Jordan knows more than anyone on this board, and I am going to reserve judgement on this draft pick until at least 2 years down the road. To try and pick this draft apart now is an exercise in futility and is pretty insane if you ask me.

There is nothing wrong with dissecting it and analyzing it with the info that we know now, its just no sense in being overly critical and not to pass judgement until there is actual evidence that a pick was a bad pick.....I personally like this year's draft, a lot, but will not know how truely good or bad of a draft it was until atleast 2014.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with dissecting it and analyzing it with the info that we know now, its just no sense in being overly critical and not to pass judgement until there is actual evidence that a pick was a bad pick.....I personally like this year's draft, a lot, but will not know how truely good or bad of a draft it was until atleast 2014.....

I don't know that I'd go quite that far but I agree, I think by 2012 we should have a good guess of how this draft turned out but by 2013 we should have a good full picture :)

If you are hanging the success of this draft on how Hobgood performs, we should feel good about that after we see him in Frederick, other than that I would hinge how we did on how many of these guys we sign. Getting Givens and Hobs under contract would be a pretty good draft already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • As in, another instance and you'd want him gone? Elias and the FO are building a foundation that will enable them to be a team I haven't witnessed in my lifetime - a consistent competitive team. I have 100% confidence in the process of the FO. Will every decision pan out? Of course not. But has the FO helped the organization more than any other FO in my lifetime? Without a doubt. My much greater concern is that Elias, Sig, et al leave because another organization realizes how valuable they are.
    • Opening Day Is a 3:05 gane start at Csmden Yards.They  are going to open the gates three hours before the game?  Have not heard this but you may be right. Fenway which usually does an 11/2 gate opening ,is doing a 2 hour gate opening for Opening Day. 
    • Don't see a final roster posted yet.  If so, I missed it.
    • On balance I think it's fair to expect the improved rotation and regressed bullpen will even out, so pitching overall for the team will remain about the same. Meanwhile the hitting should definitely improve!
    • At 76.5 I'll take the over on the O's and pass on betting their place in the standings.  While I'm pretty upset with this past off season, I'm not quite ready to grab a pitchfork.  Given that Westburg and Cowser and several others could all be ready to contribute soon, Elias should have a fair amount of flexibility at the trade deadline.  Was that his strategy all along?  Beats the heck out of me, but if that's the case and we sit and watch another failure to launch (liftoff v2.0 anyone?) then most of the goodwill I have toward him evaporates overnight.  Bottom line?  The 2022 O's earned a bigger investment than they've received so far but it's not too late to fix it.
    • MLB and the newly-unionized minor leagues just struck a new CBA.  Doubles AAA salaries with even bigger raises for the lower minors.  Now minor leaguers *almost* make a liveable wage.
    • I won't lie, I'm very concerned about not having Tate in the bullpen for a month or 2. Tate was our most reliable reliever. Hyde could always count on him to get the job done. I thought Givens could fill the gap, but now Givens is injured too. Someone is going to have to seriously step up for the bullpen. I'm also convinced that Tyler Wells has a limited number of innings he can be effective. We've seen what happened last year once he got beyond a certain threshold. (He got injured.) I think that after a couple months, we might see either Voth, Baumann, Hall, or Rodriguez take some starts in that rotation spot. Who it is, depends on how Rodriguez and Hall are doing in Norfolk. If one of them is dominating, that's who will get the call.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...