Jump to content

I have a another one--Why is Hack Wilson in the HOF?


lint06

Recommended Posts

I haven't read this whole thread. I'll just say this... the original reason for inducting Hack may have been different, but it is justified by history. Wilson STILL holds the RBI record, almost 80 years later. That's more than half of the entire history of MLB!

It was a different game. Various factors led to very high batting averages and on-base averages. You rarely had more than one or two guys who could hit homers, so you'd load up .400+ OBP guys in front of them/him and he'd pile up RBI numbers that look crazy even for the current era. Today most teams have 6, 7, 8, or more players with real power and there aren't as many .370 hitters, so RBIs are much more spread out.

Wilson's record is impressive, but look at the single season leaders from the 1920-1940 era:

RBI                           YEAR     RBI    1    Hack Wilson              1930      191   2    Lou Gehrig               1931      184   3    Hank Greenberg           1937      183   T4   Jimmie Foxx              1938      175   T4   Lou Gehrig               1927      175   6    Lou Gehrig               1930      174   7    Babe Ruth                1921      171   T8   Hank Greenberg           1935      170   T8   Chuck Klein              1930      170   10   Jimmie Foxx              1932      169   11   Joe DiMaggio             1937      167   T12  Al Simmons               1930      165   T12  Lou Gehrig               1934      165   14   Babe Ruth                1927      164   T15  Babe Ruth                1931      163   T15  Jimmie Foxx              1933      163   17   Hal Trosky               1936      162   T18  Lou Gehrig               1937      159   T18  Hack Wilson              1929      159   20   Al Simmons               1929      157   21   Jimmie Foxx              1930      156   22   Ken Williams             1922      155   T23  Babe Ruth                1929      154   T23  Joe Medwick              1937      154   25   Babe Ruth                1930      153

That's 25 seasons of 153 or more RBI. In the so-called steroid era only five people had that many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hard to say hiw Manny would have been as a SS if he’d played it right from the start in the majors.  Due to Hardy’s presence, he essentially played 3B for 5.3 seasons before ever getting a shot as full time SS.   By that time he’d lost some speed and range and was rusty at the ins and outs of SS. If 2012-14 Hardy was on this team, Gunnar would be at 3B, watching Hardy win his three Gold Gloves.  
    • The Orioles are not going to re-sign Burnes and they prob shouldn't based on what he's going to ask for. Answer is Gunnar and it's not even really close.  Give the man whatever he wants and keep him indefinitely.  
    • Gunnar. He will add an All Star nod this year and is on an MVP pace. Higher WAR in fewer PA. 
    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...