Jump to content

Dominos beginning to fall in trade market


bluedog

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What if he can't move him and make the team better long term? Would you rather just trade GS anyway because you think he is at his highest value to the O's? Would you accept a DeWitt, Elbert deal rather than not deal him? Bell even up?

I would probably not take just Bell or Wood straight up, but I would take one of them plus a lesser prospect (maybe a pitcher in A ball with high upside). I am not as big into quantity over quality as some others on the board though so I may not be the person to ask. IMHO, a potential starting 3B for the next 8 years is a good return for Sherrill, but that is why AM gets paid to do this I guess. He is a much better poker player than I am. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I believe that keeping Sherrill is in our best interest long term at this point.

He's a free agent at the end of 2011, so he's not exactly in the O's long term plans.

He's almost certainly not going to have higher value than he has right now.

The O's have other options for closer, but almost none at 1b or 3b.

This is what good teams in rebuilding mode do. They trade guys at peak value to fill positions of need elsewhere. Clearly we have to get pieces we need in any Sherrill trade, but given the extensive interest from other clubs, there has to be a deal out there somewhere that is worth doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I believe that keeping Sherrill is in our best interest long term at this point.

He's a free agent at the end of 2011, so he's not exactly in the O's long term plans.

He's almost certainly not going to have higher value than he has right now.

The O's have other options for closer, but almost none at 1b or 3b.

This is what good teams in rebuilding mode do. They trade guys at peak value to fill positions of need elsewhere. Clearly we have to get pieces we need in any Sherrill trade, but given the extensive interest from other clubs, there has to be a deal out there somewhere that is worth doing.

But if you can't get 1B/3B in return do you trade him anyway?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See now I think the Indians got quite the haul... Just goes to show, two different opinions... :D

From the Jim Callis Chat:

Glen (Philadelphia)

Ken Rosenthal is reporting the Phillies acquired Cliff Lee and Ben Francisco for Knapp, Donald, Marson, and Carasco. Thoughts on this deal?

Jim Callis (2:09 PM)

Stunned, frankly. From everything we've read about the Phillies, it seems the four pieces they value the most right now are in some order, Kyle Drabek, Dominic Brown, J.A. Happ and Michael Taylor. The Indians didn't get any of them. They got one high-upside guy (Knapp), and he's in low Class A and has some shoulder fatigue. The rest of the guys are solid regulars at best--they're not stars. Lee is very affordable for next season, and the AL Central is a very winnable division. I don't like this trade at all for the Indians. From the Phillies' standpoint, this is a great deal, to hold on to the young guys you want and get a frontline starter. I'd rather have Halladay than Lee, but I'd rather give up this package for Lee than meet J.P. Ricciardi's reported demands for Halladay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Jim Callis Chat:

Glen (Philadelphia)

Ken Rosenthal is reporting the Phillies acquired Cliff Lee and Ben Francisco for Knapp, Donald, Marson, and Carasco. Thoughts on this deal?

Jim Callis (2:09 PM)

Stunned, frankly. From everything we've read about the Phillies, it seems the four pieces they value the most right now are in some order, Kyle Drabek, Dominic Brown, J.A. Happ and Michael Taylor. The Indians didn't get any of them. They got one high-upside guy (Knapp), and he's in low Class A and has some shoulder fatigue. The rest of the guys are solid regulars at best--they're not stars. Lee is very affordable for next season, and the AL Central is a very winnable division. I don't like this trade at all for the Indians. From the Phillies' standpoint, this is a great deal, to hold on to the young guys you want and get a frontline starter. I'd rather have Halladay than Lee, but I'd rather give up this package for Lee than meet J.P. Ricciardi's reported demands for Halladay.

Totally agree with Callis...This wasn't a good deal for Cleveland, at least right now...Things could change of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • What I'd like to see in the next game Holliday plays, is for him to keep his eyes following through on the ball when he swings. In the last game I saw, he was yanking his head off the zone when he swung and couldn't see the bat to the ball. He was missing wildly and it wasn't even competitive. So, keep your eye on the ball! Follow all the way through! If your swing is so violent that it's yanking your head off the sight of the ball, then adjust your mechanics because you can't hit what you can't see!
    • What a great example of pedantic! Please tell us you meant to do that. I honestly can’t tell these days. 
    • Well it certainly doesn't look like he'll be winning Rookie of Year award. And if we send him down for like the tiniest amount of time, we get him for another year, right? I think if this poor hitting continues it's financial mismanagement not to send him back down. Grayson got sent down and came back way better.
    • He certainly isn't a bust but I wasn't happy with the pick at the time and I don't love using the second overall pick for that type of player profile. Westburg signed for slot so he's irrelevant but Mayo was a great use of the money saved.
    • Think Heston will be the next call up. Mayo’s K/BB ratio is poor and I think they’ll want to see that even out. Stowers and Norby have seen their numbers slip a bit.  It will likely take an injury to an outfielder or first baseman, but I think we see HK next. 
    • I have to laugh at some of my pre-draft thoughts as well as others. I will say on behalf of myself and some others is that what we did not understand then was what the Orioles brain trust knew to be their model, and what they best developed. What traits they were looking for is an important thing to know, in hindsight anyway. And really, the Jackson Holliday leap in development was not something most of us heard anything about until about a month before the draft. I saw him the previous summer and I cannot say he was all that impressive, but it was only one look. His physicality took a big jump after that.  I will also add that we’re never going to know what would have happened if they drafted Austin Martin, Jones, Lawler, Lacy, etc. Their development could well have been different as O’s. The funny part of this board, in general, is the absolute certainty some have in their opinions and how eager they are to trash Elias and staff. There is plenty of humility to go around, now that things have played out. It’s fun to finally have a truly great front office and ownership group, and a stacked stable of horses. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...