Jump to content

8 teams after Sherrill!


bluedog

Recommended Posts

Henderickson as a closer is an interesting thought but i don't see him with that "IT" factor that most successful closers have. He gave the O's no real value in his previous roll but now he is. I see no reason to mess with him you may end up back with him carrying no value at all. As far as i'm concerned i believe we may actually have teams fooled in believing he's worth trading for since moving him into the roll he's in. If we can get something for him great because its a matter of time before he implodes again anway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I disagree it creates a large one. No disrespect to GS at all, but if you are not a dominant reliever ala Papelbon, Rivera, etc, it's a no brainer to deal that reliever for a potential young, cheap, longterm talent. In fact I don't see why more teams don't trade their closers at peak value if they are not dominant and then just make someone else the closer.

GS doesn't even have as much value to us as he should because he shouldn't be used primarily as the closer. This is the case for most teams though.

Look at Lidge. Look at BJ Ryan. Look at Steve Kline, Mike DeJean. Borowski, Heilman...These guys are so inconsistent. Banking on GS doing this every year is not really smart, and even if he is this good every year, he is fairly easily replacable especially with our abundance of pitching talent in the organization.

There is not one player in our system who you could plug into closer and expect to be successful 4 out of 5 times. Plug in all the suspects you want but we don't have that player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would trade him as long as it's for a young major league ready player like Wood. I'd pass on Bell. It he does trade GS it's doubtful he can orchestrate any other moves at the same time.

Why do you say that? I'm pretty sure he could swing a couple smaller deals at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure we can keep trading all-star caliber players for prospects. Sherill has an easy 3 years of pitching in him.

I guess I will start watching the minor league games. Cant keep recycling players and building other teams FRANCHISES while we build our FARM SYSTEM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would trade him as long as it's for a young major league ready player like Wood. I'd pass on Bell. It he does trade GS it's doubtful he can orchestrate any other moves at the same time.

Thanks for the response. Why do you put Wood over Bell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would trade him as long as it's for a young major league ready player like Wood. I'd pass on Bell. It he does trade GS it's doubtful he can orchestrate any other moves at the same time.

So, even if the player is older and not as good, you would still take him because he is more ML ready?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is not one player in our system who you could plug into closer and expect to be successful 4 out of 5 times. Plug in all the suspects you want but we don't have that player.

Sherill before the Orioles plugged him in as the closer, was a run of the mill 30 year old LOOGY. A suspect at closing if you ask me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure we can keep trading all-star caliber players for prospects. Sherill has an easy 3 years of pitching in him.

I guess I will start watching the minor league games. Cant keep recycling players and building other teams FRANCHISES while we build our FARM SYSTEM.

That is what rebuilding teams do. You can not sit and wait around having 1-3 all stars on the team and losing year in and out. You trade your all stars for possibly 9 guys? (coming out of the Bedard trade)and get more all stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is not one player in our system who you could plug into closer and expect to be successful 4 out of 5 times. Plug in all the suspects you want but we don't have that player.

I disagree with this....And based on Sherrill's track record in the second half, he isn't going to save 4 out of every 5 either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is not one player in our system who you could plug into closer and expect to be successful 4 out of 5 times. Plug in all the suspects you want but we don't have that player.

I'd be quite happy turning the job over to Mickolio and letting him give it a shot. He has the stuff to be even better than Sherrill at his peak IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's preferred, Wood or Bell? Personally, I'd like to see us grab someone who could play first, and go after someone like Marte (wouldn't take much) and see what he could do next year. Had a great AAA and just got called up but not much of a chance for a future in Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherill before the Orioles plugged him in as the closer, was a run of the mill 30 year old LOOGY. A suspect at closing if you ask me...

I presume you wouldn't be surprised then if the Dodgers or Angels refuse to give up a top 5 pick as part of the package for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be quite happy turning the job over to Mickolio and letting him give it a shot. He has the stuff to be even better than Sherrill at his peak IMHO.

Ray(if healthy), Jim Miller, Mickolio, JJ, Koji, etc...

Plenty of guys can do it.

Koji is my choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...