Jump to content

Sherrill's first game


nevadaO

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply
But only one runner was his (a walk to Chipper). He's a set-up guy now, not a closer. He looked great.

I think this is the best part of the trade for GS. He was great as a closer for us, but as a setup guy I think he can do even better. He doesn't have to be THE MAN, just one of the men. LA is going to LOVE Flat Breezy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BrettMeister86

Struck out the side against the Braves.

He is going to be NASTY in the NL and in that joke of a division. He deserves to be on a great team so while its sad to see him go its great to know he is going to the playoffs, he has paid his dues and the Dodgers automatically become my favorite NL team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Struck out the side against the Braves.

He is going to be NASTY in the NL and in that joke of a division. He deserves to be on a great team so while its sad to see him go its great to know he is going to the playoffs, he has paid his dues and the Dodgers automatically become my favorite NL team.

They had the bases loaded to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JChav
Struck out the side against the Braves.

He is going to be NASTY in the NL and in that joke of a division. He deserves to be on a great team so while its sad to see him go its great to know he is going to the playoffs, he has paid his dues and the Dodgers automatically become my favorite NL team.

I hope this doesn't get moved to the MLB forum before enough people like myself get to see this.

I agree, he's going to be nasty over there. Sherrill can be a solid to above-average closer, but as a left handed specialist/setup guy he can be among the elite in the class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this doesn't get moved to the MLB forum before enough people like myself get to see this.

I agree, he's going to be nasty over there. Sherrill can be a solid to above-average closer, but as a left handed specialist/setup guy he can be among the elite in the class.

Agree 100%. You're last statement is the exact reason why we had to deal him, as well as why for our purpose we won that trade.

As the innings mount on Sherrill -- he becomes less and less effective. As a lefty specialist, he's truly elite. Teams that are in 5th place in the midst of a rebuilding plan don't need lefty specialists. Getting closer value for them is just icing on the cake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Struck out the side against the Braves.

He is going to be NASTY in the NL and in that joke of a division. He deserves to be on a great team so while its sad to see him go its great to know he is going to the playoffs, he has paid his dues and the Dodgers automatically become my favorite NL team.

Yes, lots of folks did, they talked about it in this thread last night:

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85785

Also he did not strike out the side, he gave up a walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this doesn't get moved to the MLB forum before enough people like myself get to see this.

I agree, he's going to be nasty over there. Sherrill can be a solid to above-average closer, but as a left handed specialist/setup guy he can be among the elite in the class.

Why don't you go to the MLB forum?

Yes, lots of folks did, they talked about it in this thread last night:

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85785

Also he did not strike out the side, he gave up a walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Striking out three outs worth of batters constitutes striking out the side, because it is called the side to describe the side of an inning.

Actually it can mean both, I was hoping Dickson had a definitive answer on this one but he doesn't in the book I have.

I take it as three up, three down, seems silly to me to have a half inning where the pitcher walked a guy, hit a guy and gave up a three run homer while "striking out the side".

The OP was evidently not incorrect to use the term in the matter they did, even though it was misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JChav
Why don't you go to the MLB forum?

And out come the OH sherpas..

I didn't look for this in the MLB forum because... I wasn't looking for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JChav
As a reminder, board rules state that you aren't supposed ot question board moderation.

Thank you

If this is directed at me... Is he a moderator? There's no indication under his user name that he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...