Jump to content

Stupid Strasburg Question


Recommended Posts

Everyone is reporting that he got a 4 year 15M deal. Does that mean that the Nats only get him for 4 years, or does the four years mean that the 15M is paid out in 4 years.

I think they only have him for 4 years, but I am not 100% sure on that.

They had a Gnats announcer on The Fan today and he thought that Strasburg was going to be on the ML team starting in '10.

But I thought you got 6 years, so I really don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 15M is paid out over 4 years.

I believe I read that he will get the prorated league minimum for the rest of the 2009 season, so I am not sure when the 4 year deal starts.

The Nationals still control him for 6 seasons once he hits the majors. What will be in the Nationals interest though is to get the four years of the deal to cover his first four seasons in the majors because if he is in the minors for one of the years and thus his current four year deal expires just as he is hitting arbitration, it will cost the Nationals close to an addition $15M compared to to the fourth year of the deal covering the fourth major league season thus only giving him two years of arbitration after his current deal expires instead of three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they only have him for 4 years, but I am not 100% sure on that.

But I thought you got 6 years, so I really don't know.

They have Strasburg signed for four years, but he remains under control for six years.

For example, Berken is under the Oriole's control but he isn't signed to a contract for 2010 yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have Strasburg signed for four years, but he remains under control for six years.

For example, Berken is under the Oriole's control but he isn't signed to a contract for 2010 yet.

So this basically means that they couldn't non-tender him if he was injured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so he isn't paid league minimum/near it for his first few seasons, like he would if he hadn't signed a MLB contract?

This is fairly accurate.

Approximately $7.5M is bonus and $7.5M is part of his four year contract. So instead of earning $1.2M over his first three seasons and whatever his first year of arbitration, he is guaranteed the $7.5M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They paid him his $7.5 signing bonus, and then the other $7.5 or whatever it is is split over the 4 years a little less than $2m per year for the first 4 years, setting his value for his first two arbitration years (since he'll be a super 2), then his last 2 arb years he'll be eligible for arbitration before hitting FA at the ripe age of 27.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • There is no question in my mind that the coaching staff and analytics staff is doing everything in their power to make sure that Holliday is as well prepared as possible before every game.  And he's been in few enough games at this point to where I wonder if there's enough data yet to start drawing up an effective strategy anyway.  Now that the decision has been made to bring him up, Holliday is owed a long enough window to show he can't make the adjustment even with the benefit of the best support.  If that means he has to be sent down, I'm not going to stress about it.  I'm also not going to hold my breath that he'll turn the corner even so.  Adley made it, Gunnar made it, so did Westburg and Cowser and Mountcastle and Grayson...  If Holliday doesn't make it I'll be surprised and disappointed, but the Orioles under Elias are still way ahead of the game and Norby is looking for an opportunity and time marches on.
    • We have 5 guys on pace for 117 RBI. 
    • If a good defensive SS hits 54 HR and is only worth 8.1 WAR I’m gonna have some serious questions on their methodology. 
    • It’s not the same …. Henderson was batting just under .200. Holliday is batting .040. So about 20 % as good as Henderson was at his worst. And he’s striking out in more than 1 out of 2 trips to the plate.   There is no sense panicking either way. But, there is nothing wrong with sending him down. I think too many of you guys are acting like not sticking with him is some kind of sin. As a fan, I’m worried about damaging his confidence too much.    Plus after all the bullshit from his father, hopefully now he will keep his mouth shut.
    • Pedantic is an adjective. Your definition has it as a noun.
    • There's a difference between being patient at the plate as opposed to comatose.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...