Jump to content

"See The Birds" promotion shutdown


ChaosLex

Do you agree or disagree with the O's "shutting down" the WNST promotion?  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you agree or disagree with the O's "shutting down" the WNST promotion?



Recommended Posts

This was posted earlier in the day by Drew Forrester

We’re going back to the ballpark next Tuesday, September 15 when the O’s host the Tampa Bay Rays.

Who’s going, you ask?

Well, I know I’m going. I hope YOU’RE going as well.

In fact, WNST is going to try and drag a bunch of you downtown next Tuesday night to take advantage of $1.00 tickets and to help generate some funds for The Right Side Foundation, the organization recently started by Nick Markakis and his wife, Christina.

http://wnst.net/wordpress/drewforrester/2009/09/08/if-the-os-are-selling-tix-for-100-lets-buy-them-for-next-tuesday/

Per WNST, the O's have "refused" to sell the tickets to WNST, so the promotion has been shutdown.

Obviously, the O's FO isn't the biggest fan of WNST, since the "Free The Birds" promotion of a few seasons ago. But then again, this was purportedly going to charity.

Provided you believe that the O's have "refused" to sell the tickets to WNST (and this isn't just a publicity stunt by Nestor and the bunch), do you agree or disagree with their decision.

Thoughts!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm not sure whether or not I believe WNST that the Orioles "refused" to sell them their tickets, but at this point I'm pretty ambivalent about it. It's the Orioles' right to refuse to sell tickets, and for all they know, WNST's just going to stage a walk-out protest again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on, it's for charity. The O's should extend the olive branch already. They can't expect independently owned radio stations to be falling all over themselves to praise a team that hasn't had a winning record in 12 years....

No, it's self-promotion in the name of charity...and that's crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever the O's front office would have chosen to do would have been a catch 22.

If they refuse, they're viewed by the NST faithful as completely heartless.

If they capitulate and sell NST the tickets, then Nestor is appeased, and he boasts about the influence they have on the organization.

Unstoppable force, immovable object. That whole thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever the O's front office would have chosen to do would have been a catch 22.

If they refuse, they're viewed by the NST faithful as completely heartless.

If they capitulate and sell NST the tickets, then Nestor is appeased, and he boasts about the influence they have on the organization.

Unstoppable force, immovable object. That whole thing.

That's a good point.

Personally, I was really torn when it came to voting, because I see both sides of the argument. However, I chose the "disagree" option, simply because all benefits would *reportedly* go to charity. Now, if the FO makes a donation to Nick The Stick's charity, I'll have no qualms whatsoever with their decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever the O's front office would have chosen to do would have been a catch 22.

If they refuse, they're viewed by the NST faithful as completely heartless.

If they capitulate and sell NST the tickets, then Nestor is appeased, and he boasts about the influence they have on the organization.

Unstoppable force, immovable object. That whole thing.

Its not even that. NST KNOWS what will happen. They should know that only 500 dollar tickets are available, and they are ONLY AVAILABLE FOR INDIVIDUAL SALE ONLINE, as is clearly pointed out on the website.

http://baltimore.orioles.mlb.com/bal/ticketing/masn.jsp

Now, NST could attempt to purchase a couple hundred tickets for the game in advance, Nestor could do it - he could get some nameless-faceless inter at the studio to do it, give him the money and that would be the end of it.

But, at the end of the day, they should know that this promotion is not intended to be used by groups, that what group ticket pricing is for.

Now, if they want to get a bunch of people together to try and sit in the same section, like they did last time - they could easily do that. But to me it seems that NST is purposefully exploiting a flaw in the system to make the Orioles look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good point.

Personally, I was really torn when it came to voting, because I see both sides of the argument. However, I chose the "disagree" option, simply because all benefits would *reportedly* go to charity. Now, if the FO makes a donation to Nick The Stick's charity, I'll have no qualms whatsoever with their decision.

I'm sure the Orioles have aleady made donations to Nick's charity this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ticketmaster charge is fifty cents per ticket with no order fee. The Orioles were upfront that fans couldn't purchase tickets at the gates and must be purchased 24 hours in advance. They also stated that only 500 tickets were available per game. Let's not pretend that fans are getting raked over the coals in unexpected charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agreed.  But that X post was by a CHW fan, so I'll allow it.
    • No one thought Burnes was an option.  I think pretty much everyone would have taken the Burns deal over the proposed Cease deals.
    • You'd have Mateo. I'd prefer to save him for pinch-running though.  Of course, I'd have just let O'Hearn hit. My suggestion was just for those who think the world would end if O'Hearn batted against a LHP.   
    • Honestly, I could see the decision either way.  O’Hearn is a hot hitter historically vulnerable to lefties.   Hays historically hits lefties well but has been as cold as you can get.  He’s a significant defensive upgrade to O’Hearn for the rest of the game.  So what do you do? If my only concern was to maximize the chance to win today’s game, I’d probably stick with O’Hearn, for a reason not mentioned yet.  This was the leadoff batter in the 7th inning, and if anyone gets on base the next three innings, that means the batter will get one more AB after the one in the 7th inning, and decent chance that AB will be against a RHP.   So, that favors leaving O’Hearn in. At the same time, I don’t believe that maximizing the chance to win this game was the only consideration.  Simply put, Hyde wants to keep Hays involved in things, and wants to give him opportunities to break out of his slump.  And that’s important for the long term benefit of the team.   So, as I see it, it’s a close call, and I wouldn’t criticize Hyde either way.  We won the game so I’m certainly not going to obsess about it.    
    • Remember when we used to be on the other side of this ledger? How easy some forget. We don’t have to put others down to prop ourselves up. I hope we don’t become that annoying/arrogant fanbase who likes to run others’ noses in it.
    • Probably as tough a night as Bradish's yesterday was encouraging.   I think it'll be found some persistent aspect of the injury he's now rehabbing is somehow at the root of this ineffectiveness....otherwise I'm not sure what happens when the rehab assignment clock runs out.
    • Enos and Brit were talking about Lindor's slow start recently.  As part of the discussion Enos said that players tend to swing less in the first month and pitchers can rake advantage of that.  I wonder if the Sigbot is arbitraging that with more aggressive PAs?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...