Jump to content

Who do we draft in 2010


Recommended Posts

With all of the speculation of what we will do this off-season to improve our team.....

Who do we draft this year. Seeming that we have a high pick again, what will ANDY do in this area?? A lot of our recent picks are in the bigs right now, so where do we go this go around???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a ton of speculation every year, but it's a friggin crapshoot trying to guess. I guarantee you not one person anywhere had Hobgood pencilled in for fifth overall pick for the Orioles in 2009.

It seems to me that most people would prefer if Harper came here, but since he's likely to go to the Nats (unless signability is an issue, then he'd go to the Bucs), Orioles faithful like prep pitcher Taillon in the three-spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all of the speculation of what we will do this off-season to improve our team.....

Who do we draft this year. Seeming that we have a high pick again, what will ANDY do in this area?? A lot of our recent picks are in the bigs right now, so where do we go this go around???

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89001

There is a draft forum. Its great. Check it out.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an "automatic" player with the potential to make an impact within his first 2 seasons??? ALA Weiters or Matusz

There are none that are sure things, in that regard. Draftees like Wieters and Matusz, Smoak, Price, etc... they were expected to rise rapidly, but this group doesn't necessarily have one of those at this time. It's quite possible by the end of the coming spring, collegians like Anthony Renaudo, Bryce Brentz, Christian Colon, and Deck McGuire could profile that way. Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are none that are sure things, in that regard. Draftees like Wieters and Matusz, Smoak, Price, etc... they were expected to rise rapidly, but this group doesn't necessarily have one of those at this time. It's quite possible by the end of the coming spring, collegians like Anthony Renaudo, Bryce Brentz, Christian Colon, and Deck McGuire could profile that way. Time will tell.

I have a feeling Ranaudo is gonna be that guy, but I also think we dont have a big chance of drafting him. Hes a Boras guy and there will be other better or equal talent available to us at our slot....But hes the closest thing to a Matusz type. I just dont think hes as safe as Matusz or has as high of a ceiling that Matusz had, Matusz had better stuff.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling Ranaudo is gonna be that guy, but I also think we dont have a big chance of drafting him. Hes a Boras guy and there will be other better or equal talent available to us at our slot....But hes the closest thing to a Matusz type. I just dont think hes as safe as Matusz or has as high of a ceiling that Matusz had, Matusz had better stuff.....

I wasn't that impressed with him in the tourney last year. Given I was watching in a casino in Vegas, so I may have been distracted a bit, but I do remember wondering where all this hype was based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't that impressed with him in the tourney last year. Given I was watching in a casino in Vegas, so I may have been distracted a bit, but I do remember wondering where all this hype was based.

Really? Ive read a lot of places rumors of him throwing mid 90's with a ML curve, but whenver I see him I see low low 90's and a good curve. I think hes among the safest in the top half of the draft. Not safe like Mike Leake though, but with a higher ceiling also. I dont look at Ranaudo as the #3 overall talent in the upcomign draft, but I definitely think hes in the top 5 or so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Raynaudo is closest to the Majors. I don't know if that factors in the decision making, but if that is a consideration, he's closest.

As it stands now, I'd go with Harper, Taillon, Raynaudo, Cole in that order. We'll see how thing change this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...