Jump to content

Unplug the fridge


Todd-O

Recommended Posts

The other thing that you have to consider is profitability versus cash flow.

On paper, if my non profit accounting is correct, a football team takes in gross revenues and has to partially offset them with the cost of the scholarships given to its athletes to arrive at a "Net" revenues number.

On paper, the scholarships would be a "contra revenue" not technically an expense. However, its a cashless transaction, no cash actually left the business. It's a paper journal entry.

True. Also, the value used to calculate that cost is the listed tuition cost, when in reality some student athletes would have financial aid anyway. Still the scholarships are a legitimate cost in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The other thing that you have to consider is profitability versus cash flow.

On paper, if my non profit accounting is correct, a football team takes in gross revenues and has to partially offset them with the cost of the scholarships given to its athletes to arrive at a "Net" revenues number.

On paper, the scholarships would be a "contra revenue" not technically an expense. However, its a cashless transaction, no cash actually left the business. It's a paper journal entry.

Here's where I think college athletics differ from your model....at least in the case of UMd. For all colleges money for scholarships is subject to Title IX, and at UMd those funds comes from a source that is completely separate from the other operational expenses for each team (i.e. coaches salaries, facilities, uniforms, travel, etc) If I'm correct, all money that goes towards scholarships comes from the Terrapin Club. Other money generated (ticket revenues, TV deals/endorsements, direct donations) pays for operational expenses for each team..and obviously almost all of that money is generated

by the football and men's basketball teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's where I think college athletics differ from your model....at least in the case of UMd. For all colleges money for scholarships is subject to Title IX' date=' and at UMd those funds comes from a source that is completely separate from the other operational expenses for each team (i.e. coaches salaries, facilities, uniforms, travel, etc) If I'm correct, all money that goes towards scholarships comes from the Terrapin Club. Other money generated (ticket revenues, TV deals/endorsements, direct donations) pays for operational expenses for each team..and obviously almost all of that money is generated

by the football and men's basketball teams.[/quote']

True. All depends on how each school's athletic program funds itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, the limited IP so far is small.  But it feels like he's not at the right level of competition. Of course it's also as much competing against himself (pitch shape, location, etc. that the team tracks) as against the hitters too.  Like you mentioned elsewhere, he's younger than DeLeon.
    • I think they’d go with 4 lefties before sending Akin to AAA. If everyone is healthy: SP: Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Means/Irvin RP: Kimbrel, Cano, Coulombe, Perez, Akin, Suárez, Webb/Baumann, Irvin/Means Option: Wells, Tate DFA: Ramirez, Baumann/Webb And then if they want Wells, they either DFA the other of Webb/Baumann or option Akin.  They also have the ability to option Kremer, but he’s really have to pitch poorly for that to happen.
    • With Cowser hitting lefties ok so far, not a lot of reason for McKenna. Mateo has already played CF once as well, so they are covered down with defense in CF and Kjerstad brings a much better bat. 
    • The guys been part of the team for a few years now at this point, do you really think his name is Brian?  Hell I'm guessing the story you linked mentioned his first name at least once.   Also who cares what Roch thinks?  If McKenna was coming back up, he would have a couple days ago instead of 'Silent J'.
    • Not his sharpest outing today. Pretty pitch-inefficient. Gave up a series of pretty soft hits. Able to grind thru 4 innings (I assume his day is done) w/ solid results: 7 K, 3 H, 1 BB, 1 R, 86 pitches    Edit: came back out to get 2 outs in the 5th. 94 pitch outing.
    • Not just WS contenders, but most Playoff contenders will be looking for bullpen upgrades as the deadline nears....if we're being honest with ourselves, if 70% of the teams have a shot at the playoffs, and the other 30% only have a handful (combined) of quality arms they might consider dealing, we should expect to have to pay a Kings Ransom to outbid those that are competing with us for the talent.  And, therein lies the problem.....we won't get a fair and reasonable deal by Hangout standards, it will have to be an overpay, or we settle for another Flaherty type.  That's just the reality folks. My point  being, be prepared to be disappointed that we had to give up too much, or we didn't get who we really wanted.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...