Jump to content

Lackey to B-Sox?


bballguru

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

My thought is that you should fix your thread title.

You posted something that made it sound like it's a done thing.

But then, upon following your link, we discover it's just a rumor based on some unnamed source saying he took a physical.

So, fix your title by saying it's a rumor or by addiing a ? at the end, or something like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thought is that you should fix your thread title.

You posted something that made it sound like it's a done thing.

But then, upon following your link, we discover it's just a rumor based on some unnamed source saying he took a physical.

So, fix your title by saying it's a rumor or by addiing a ? at the end, or something like that...

The rumor was confirmed to be true by Ken Rosenthal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thought is that you should fix your thread title.

You posted something that made it sound like it's a done thing.

But then, upon following your link, we discover it's just a rumor based on some unnamed source saying he took a physical.

So, fix your title by saying it's a rumor or by addiing a ? at the end, or something like that...

Jeez. . Officer Thread Title Patrol reporting for duty. . haha take it easy ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This move would mean that they are probably not going to be able to get Bay. Their lineup still heads Ellsbury, Pedoria, Youk, Victor Martinez but DH looks thin and Sacturo does not impress. Still, Lackey - Beckett - Lester - Buchholz - Wakefield/ Dice K is as stout as stout can be. That could very seriously be 5 numer one starters. If Buchholz is ready, Lester was a number one last year, Beckett has been and looked a lot better last year, Lackey is border line if not defiantly, and Dice K went 18-5 not long ago.....

On one hand it makes me think we need to add a centerpiece and on the other hand it makes me think we should keep all the pitching we can and hope three stars come out in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rumor was confirmed to be true by Ken Rosenthal.

If by "confirmed", you mean just repeating the exact same unsourced rumor, well, I agree that he did repeat it.

However, I don't see how it confirms anything to have multiple people passing on exact same unsourced rumor.

It's not like there is any evidence whatsoever of multiple sources or of credible sources. It's just "a ML source".

This is how we heard that BRob was going to Cubs several times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by "confirmed", you mean just repeating the exact same unsourced rumor, well, I agree that he did repeat it.

However, I don't see how it confirms anything to have multiple people passing on exact same unsourced rumor.

It's not like there is any evidence whatsoever of multiple sources or of credible sources. It's just "a ML source".

This is how we heard that BRob was going to Cubs several times...

Fixed that for you :)

According to the Boston Globe, he did confirm it.

The Red Sox are moving close to a deal with free agent starting pitcher John Lackey according to a report by FoxSports' Ken Rosenthal, who confirmed an earlier Twitter report by Ed Price of AOL Fanhouse.
source - Boston Globe.

ETA: Jon Heyman on Twitter says it's a 5 year / $85 million deal.

http://twitter.com/SI_JonHeyman/status/6671618454

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by "confirmed", you mean just repeating the exact same unsourced rumor, well, I agree that he did repeat it.

However, I don't see how it confirms anything to have multiple people passing on exact same unsourced rumor.

It's not like there is any evidence whatsoever of multiple sources or of credible sources. It's just "a ML source".

This is how we heard that BRob was going to Cubs several times...

1:41pm: Yahoo's Tim Brown has an Angels source who believes they're still in the running for Lackey and the pitcher has not accepted a Boston offer. Still, SI's Jon Heyman heard a five-year, approximately $85MM figure for a Boston deal.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/john-lackey-rumors-monday-1.html

Video:

http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/mlb/news/story?id=4741437

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...