Jump to content

Sign Holliday or trade prospects?


JTrea81

To land an established big bat before 2011 what you would rather do?  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. To land an established big bat before 2011 what you would rather do?


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I could just as easily speculate that Dunn would prefer:

1) a 3-year deal with a vesting option (based on games and All-star voting) on a fourth year to DH, over

2) a 1 or two year deal to maybe play LF or 1B.

Good speculation, however, I do think that the Red Sox would pay more to sign Dunn as Ortiz's replacement and the Yankees would as well (though they have a lot of internal replacements for Johnson such as Posada, Jeter, and even A. Rodriguez, so in my speculation, they are less likely to sign him).

That said, I also speculate that the Red Sox and Yankees are "holding the line" on spending to see which (my speculation is all) of Mauer, F. Hernandez, Pujols, Fielder and A. Gonzalez come up in FA in 2012. So, with that in mind, perhaps the Orioles can get Dunn for DH in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I do think, without question, that Holliday is going to be the best bet for us in terms of a big bat FA. I think people are living in fantasy land if they think the Orioles are going to sign someone like Fielder...it just isn't happening unless his performance declines, he has injury issues, etc...

I think that's only if you're just considering long-term options like Trea does. Dunn, Lee, and Pena are guys that are realistic to sign and can produce similarly imo. But for less years, which I don't think is a bad thing since Holliday isn't likely to be a big bat in the second half of his deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, if true, it does help the argument that after Matt Holliday is signed all the good players are gone forever.

HAH! The evidence is really stacking up. What a lopsided argument this is becoming. Soon the rest of the dominos will fall and the Orioles (Holliday-less) will have to look back at their mistakes and another decade of failure :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, as I feel he is going to be worth what he is paid. Remember we aren't talking 7/140 here, which is what he would normally get.

So Holliday is only worth it if you get him for bargain basement prices? What would be the most the Orioles could spend on Holliday and it still be a wortwhile deal in your mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's only if you're just considering long-term options like Trea does. Dunn, Lee, and Pena are guys that are realistic to sign and can produce similarly imo. But for less years, which I don't think is a bad thing since Holliday isn't likely to be a big bat in the second half of his deal.

Yes, I am talking long term.

But this post is 100% accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Prospects Live has their first scouting book out and Gunnar is on the cover.  Please be no jinx. Please be no jinx. Prospects Live
    • I have no doubt that the WBC games are 100 times more electric than a spring training game.  ST games are very relaxing and fun, but they are the opposite of intense.  I’m still surprised at the viewing disparity, though I’ll wait until tomorrow night before considering the poll results comparable since I started the WBC poll a day earlier.  
    • Fangraphs credits him with 2.1 fWAR at 3B and 1.7 at SS, so that’s 3.8 so far (it’s possible they might have him dabbling at DH once in a while, we’ll see).  At SS, the O’s ranked 18th at 3.4 fWAR, with Mateo and Henderson splitting time roughly 60/40.  Fangraphs comments: “This playing time projection is the numerical equivalent of throwing your hands up in the air. Henderson looks bound for stardom, be it at third or shortstop, but Mateo is still holding on to the position for now after a solid defensive year established him as the everyday starter. His offensive numbers are downright ugly – that .284 projected wOBA is the second-lowest for anyone in this article with 100 or more PAs – but you can get away with that kind of bat at shortstop if your glove is transcendent. “In 2022, Mateo’s was, but he’d never flashed that level of defense before, so Orioles talent evaluators will have their work cut out for them early in the year. Henderson will likely start the season at third base, but if Mateo’s defense looks shaky, the team should make the switch sooner rather than later. Those offensive numbers next to Henderson’s name are no joke — think Corey Seager, if you’re looking for a parallel as an offense-first lefty shortstop. 2023 is just the start of Baltimore’s plan for contention, but what they do at shortstop will have ramifications for both this year and the future.” https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2023-positional-power-rankings-shortstop/  
    • What I've been seeing overall is that a lot of fans were more engaged with the WBC than with their regular team this spring. Just yesterday I was talking to someone who had gone to the games in Miami and were raving about the experience.
    • I hadn’t really started the WBC poll with this in mind, but so far it appears that many more OH members tuned into the WBC than have tuned in to O’s spring training games.   Considering the composition of the audience, and the frequent complaints about the paucity of O’s spring training broadcasts, that’s not necessarily the outcome I would have expected.  
    • It's only Spring Training, but....... I'm getting pretty amped up for some baseball. 
    • Either I’m going crazy or there was a glitch on baseball reference that day. No wonder I thought was amazing!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...