Jump to content

FSU & MD Game Thread - 1/10/10


The Rick

Recommended Posts

Was out celebrating the Ravens win so I missed the game and can't comment on anything specifically. I do know this was as close to a must win game as there is for an ACC opener. We have to get to 9 wins to have any chance to make the tourny this year. As inconsistent as this team can be from game to game we needed to win at home to start conference play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Dino, you are there for rebounding and D, not shooting.

From what I saw, his problem was that he kept going for a blocked shot, leaving his man wide open for offensive putbacks.

Dino may still have his shortcomings, but this team isn't going anywhere without him as a third big man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very well played game by the Terps last night. Impressive from start to finish. There was a little hiccup in the middle of the 2nd half, but you can't go through an entire game against a top 20 team without them making a nice run to get back in it.

Good win, lets build on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I saw, his problem was that he kept going for a blocked shot, leaving his man wide open for offensive putbacks.

Dino may still have his shortcomings, but this team isn't going anywhere without him as a third big man.

It happened about 5 times in a 5 minute span in the 2nd half - pretty much the only thing keeping FLaSt in the game. He didn't block any shots, and one time - when he had a good opportunity, he alligator-armed it - giving up a layin. I'd be more comfortable with Padgett getting more minutes as the 3rd big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes, I knew you were going to post that. :rolleyes:

You know what, for now take out the shooting part... and everything else is still true.

He's a little weak as an ACC caliber starter, but he is an excellent shooter when he has time. He doesn't have a quick release though.

Its that the "should seriously give up playing basketball" comments and that he "can't" do any of those things that he can do, just not particularly well is obvious hyperbole. Its fun for screaming at the TV while watching the game in a crowded bar, but its pretty much useless when actually trying to have an intelligent conversation about the team and its players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes, I knew you were going to post that. :rolleyes:

You know what, for now take out the shooting part... and everything else is still true.

Save for a three-game run before yesterday, Hayes has been a solid, integral part of this team. Further, having a guy who can shoot 85+% from the line and 45+% from 3pt range is incredibly valuable on a team with no other shooters. Further, his A:TO is well over 2. Which is a nice addition.

Hayes isn't great at creating his own shot, but he's been good since he was put in the 6th man role last year.

Vasquez has looked really good for the last ten games or so, too. It's been nice to see him stepping forward when it's needed, but doing little things to keep the offense going when it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Save for a three-game run before yesterday, Hayes has been a solid, integral part of this team. Further, having a guy who can shoot 85+% from the line and 45+% from 3pt range is incredibly valuable on a team with no other shooters. Further, his A:TO is well over 2. Which is a nice addition.

Hayes isn't great at creating his own shot, but he's been good since he was put in the 6th man role last year.

Vasquez has looked really good for the last ten games or so, too. It's been nice to see him stepping forward when it's needed, but doing little things to keep the offense going when it's not.

That A/TO ratio is 2nd in the ACC. He plays a vital role on the team - though he is a very poor defender.

The thing that impressed/surprised me most about Maryland - their half-court offense. Throughout the years, they've had problems in the half court, but they were excellent yesterday. Grevis deserves a lot of credit. They couldn't guard him one on one. He drew doubles and set up his teammates - especially Hayes - very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayes is the type of guy where if you accept him for what he is you appreciate what he brings to the table. Yes, he isn't a great athlete, which is why he can't create for himself and has trouble defensively but he is a good shooter and a good passer. Ideally, he is your 7th or 8th man but he has performed admirably in a larger role throughout his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayes is the type of guy where if you accept him for what he is you appreciate what he brings to the table. Yes, he isn't a great athlete, which is why he can't create for himself and has trouble defensively but he is a good shooter and a good passer. Ideally, he is your 7th or 8th man but he has performed admirably in a larger role throughout his career.
I agree with his completely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grevis deserves a lot of credit. They couldn't guard him one on one. He drew doubles and set up his teammates - especially Hayes - very well.

I am incapable of giving him credit. What if, instead, I promise not to discuss my hatred of him for a while?;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...