Jump to content

MacPhail:"this week we would put the finishing touches on" the roster."


wildcard

Recommended Posts

So, we put Pie on the bench so we can watch Crede and Atkins? LOL...Just when you think this organization is turning the corner in terms of decision making, they go and do things like this.

At least the stupidity is consistent, I will give them that.

Let's wait until this happens before we start pulling the stupidity card. I don't want anything to do with Crede either, trust me. But if the O's go into 2010 with Crede/Atkins at 3B/1B I'll be scratching me head hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Let's not miss the bowl while urinating, here.

It's not like Atkins is 38 years old and has never been productive. They've obviously identified something in him that they like and feel he could be productive. Plus, they prefer him at 1st base, which is good b/c we don't have to worry as much about Blalock. And it's a one year deal with a team option, so if he is productive you can hang onto him for another year.

I'm not crazy about Crede, but Tejada's never played third base... so that's a bit of a conundrum to me. You get additional roster flexibility with Tejada b/c you can use him as your backup SS, making Andino redundant. That's a plus. I would think they'd take Crede in a heartbeat if he was a reasonably good bet to stay healthy, but he's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree it really stinks if that is the way the guy feels about the Orioles though:(

I'm not claiming to know what Sheets (or any free agent who doesn't want to sign with the Orioles) is thinking, but it isn't always a case of not wanting to play for the Orioles because they aren't good. At this point it clearly looks like Sheets isn't going to get the money he initially wanted. 2010 is going to be about establishing himself again so he can get the payday he wants in 2011. The AL East is about the worst place to do that (pitch for a year in order to get a big payday the next off season) and on top of that, there is even less incentives to try and do that while playing for a team near the bottom of the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's wait until this happens before we start pulling the stupidity card. I don't want anything to do with Crede either, trust me. But if the O's go into 2010 with Crede/Atkins at 3B/1B I'll be scratching me head hard.

Why is that?

Bell and Synder aren't going to be on the opening day roster. Both Crede/Atkins contracts will be easy to trade/dump when Bell and Synder become ready.

I actually like these moves because there was nobody in the FA market that would fit into the long-term plans (3+ years) for O's.

Plus with our young pitching....soon FA players would want to come to Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not miss the bowl while urinating, here.

It's not like Atkins is 38 years old and has never been productive. They've obviously identified something in him that they like and feel he could be productive.

Lots of guys "could be" productive. I don't like Atkins' odds at all. We should have gotten someone this winter who was highly likely to be productive. We haven't, at either corner spot. That's poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you guys have been complaining about Atkins, I predict the guy is going to have a monster year for the Orioles. It cracks me up how you guys think you are smarter than AM. The Atkins signing is over and done with so please stop complaining about it. You guys talk all the time about how you want to see the Orioles sign some low risk/high reward type players. Well, the Orioles did that and AM should be commended for it. You will be singing AM's praises by the end of the season. Just wait and see.

Andrew,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you guys have been complaining about Atkins' date=' I predict the guy is going to have a monster year for the Orioles. It cracks me up how you guys think you are smarter than AM. The Atkins signing is over and done with so please stop complaining about it. You guys talk all the time about how you want to see the Orioles sign some low risk/high reward type players. Well, the Orioles did that and AM should be commended for it. You will be singing AM's praises by the end of the season. Just wait and see.

Andrew,[/quote']

As in Andrew MacPhail? :P

Atkins is a huge question mark, and it really makes one wonder why they wanted him so badly for 1B considering they could have had Adam LaRoche who would have been a better contributor at 1B for only a few million more.

Crede or Tejada and Atkins at the corners is not giving Trembley the pieces he needs to win. MacPhail seems to be sacrificing production at the corners, and thus winning less games, just so that the path is clear for Snyder and Bell, if they make it to the majors this year.

That's not what MacPhail said this season was about. It was supposed to be about evaluating the team on wins and losses, and given what he hasn't done this offseason, Trembley's a cooked goose by the AS break unless there is some major overacheiving going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adjust Atkins' numbers to remove the Coors effect and it would look even worse.

I'm glad that Jon Heyman thinks that Atkins has to get better.

Miggy's non-home numbers in two seasons with Houston are not a huge improvement.

667 PA 9 HR .705

This has the potential for a debacle. If the corner infielders drag this team to a 72-win season, AM is going to look really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as you guys have been complaining about Atkins' date=' I predict the guy is going to have a monster year for the Orioles. It cracks me up how you guys think you are smarter than AM. The Atkins signing is over and done with so please stop complaining about it. You guys talk all the time about how you want to see the Orioles sign some low risk/high reward type players. Well, the Orioles did that and AM should be commended for it. You will be singing AM's praises by the end of the season. Just wait and see.

Andrew,[/quote']

I hope you are right. The Atkins signing, coupled with a more reliable bat, would have been fine with me. I just don't like the combination of Atkins with another player who is not likely to bring much offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The choice between Crede and Miggy has to be money driven. Crede is probably around $2M. Miggy is coming up from something like $13M last year. He has to accept something like $5M to be considered by MacPhail. Others have been forced to do it like Vlad and Abreu. I wonder if Miggy can bring himself to sign for a much lower salary. I know he probably doesn't have alot of choices but he is a proud guy. It's interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does this have to do with Pie? Very little, IMO. It is far more likely to cost Wigginton and Scott AB than it is to affect Pie.

Really?

Tell me Frobby, what is going to happen if Crede is signed?

Do you really think Scott will be on the bench 3-4 games a week?

Do you think they are going to sit Reimold a lot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's wait until this happens before we start pulling the stupidity card. I don't want anything to do with Crede either, trust me. But if the O's go into 2010 with Crede/Atkins at 3B/1B I'll be scratching me head hard.

The fact that they are even considering it is enough for me Tony.

That means they have sat down, had meetings, etc....and the conclusion is this is what is best for the team.

How on earth could they have even come up with that idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As in Andrew MacPhail? :P

Atkins is a huge question mark, and it really makes one wonder why they wanted him so badly for 1B considering they could have had Adam LaRoche who would have been a better contributor at 1B for only a few million more.

Adam LaRoche did not seem interested in coming to Baltimore because his stats would not have been as good playing in the AL East. The guy also does not seem to be too bright. He turned down like 17 million dollars. You don't turn down that kind of money especially in this economy. I would much rather have Atkins at first. The guy wants to be in Baltimore and is determined to put last year behind him. Garret Atkins has break out year written all over him in my opinion. I will be very surprised if he has another bad year like last year.

Andrew,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the plan all along was that Bell was coming up sometime this season...at least potentially? If that's the case, then would we want Tejada coming in to take 3B? I can't imagine Tejada being cool with losing any playing time or moving somewhat to DH.

Am I off on the Bell timeline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • As in, another instance and you'd want him gone? Elias and the FO are building a foundation that will enable them to be a team I haven't witnessed in my lifetime - a consistent competitive team. I have 100% confidence in the process of the FO. Will every decision pan out? Of course not. But has the FO helped the organization more than any other FO in my lifetime? Without a doubt. My much greater concern is that Elias, Sig, et al leave because another organization realizes how valuable they are.
    • Opening Day Is a 3:05 gane start at Csmden Yards.They  are going to open the gates three hours before the game?  Have not heard this but you may be right. Fenway which usually does an 11/2 gate opening ,is doing a 2 hour gate opening for Opening Day. 
    • Don't see a final roster posted yet.  If so, I missed it.
    • On balance I think it's fair to expect the improved rotation and regressed bullpen will even out, so pitching overall for the team will remain about the same. Meanwhile the hitting should definitely improve!
    • At 76.5 I'll take the over on the O's and pass on betting their place in the standings.  While I'm pretty upset with this past off season, I'm not quite ready to grab a pitchfork.  Given that Westburg and Cowser and several others could all be ready to contribute soon, Elias should have a fair amount of flexibility at the trade deadline.  Was that his strategy all along?  Beats the heck out of me, but if that's the case and we sit and watch another failure to launch (liftoff v2.0 anyone?) then most of the goodwill I have toward him evaporates overnight.  Bottom line?  The 2022 O's earned a bigger investment than they've received so far but it's not too late to fix it.
    • MLB and the newly-unionized minor leagues just struck a new CBA.  Doubles AAA salaries with even bigger raises for the lower minors.  Now minor leaguers *almost* make a liveable wage.
    • I won't lie, I'm very concerned about not having Tate in the bullpen for a month or 2. Tate was our most reliable reliever. Hyde could always count on him to get the job done. I thought Givens could fill the gap, but now Givens is injured too. Someone is going to have to seriously step up for the bullpen. I'm also convinced that Tyler Wells has a limited number of innings he can be effective. We've seen what happened last year once he got beyond a certain threshold. (He got injured.) I think that after a couple months, we might see either Voth, Baumann, Hall, or Rodriguez take some starts in that rotation spot. Who it is, depends on how Rodriguez and Hall are doing in Norfolk. If one of them is dominating, that's who will get the call.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...