Jump to content

Vasquez for ACC POY


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

What would Greivis have to do to win the award? I think the terps would have to finish in at least a tie for first place and would have to beat duke along the way. Why is Scheyer getting so much hype for national player of the year and Vasquez doesn't? Vasquez ACC numbers 21.5/4.5/6.4. Scheyer ACC numbers 18.8/3/4.5. And even though Vasquez goes to the rim more, Scheyer has 152 Ft attempts to Vasquez's 113. I think for Greivis to win the award UMD would have to win out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What would Greivis have to do to win the award? I think the terps would have to finish in at least a tie for first place and would have to beat duke along the way. Why is Scheyer getting so much hype for national player of the year and Vasquez doesn't? Vasquez ACC numbers 21.5/4.5/6.4. Scheyer ACC numbers 18.8/3/4.5. And even though Vasquez goes to the rim more, Scheyer has 152 Ft attempts to Vasquez's 113. I think for Greivis to win the award UMD would have to win out.

Hope that the Tobacco Road voters suddenly all give up the right to vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than maybe Delaney from VTech it has to be between Scheyer and Vasquez. They will have to consider who each player has around them. Scheyer has a better supporting cast with Nolan Smith and Kyle Singler. From what I have heard from the National Media I think Vasquez is actually slightly ahead of Scheyer right now. I don't think we need to finish first in the conference, but I think a win over Duke at home and an 11-5 or 12-4 finish would seal it for Greivis. I'd be disappointed with any less than 11-5 at this point. Only games we won't be favored in the rest of the way are going to be at home vs. Duke (possible pick em) and at Virginia Tech. Milbourne could sneak onto the third team, but I see him most likely being an honorable mention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its very wide open...Singler is playing great right now and since he was the preseason POY, if he ends the year on a role, he will probably win it.

Right now, I think it should be Vazquez...He means more to the Terps than maybe any player means to his team in the country...and he is playing at a high level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope that the Tobacco Road voters suddenly all give up the right to vote.

I agree. If Duke wins the ACC then Scheyer will probably take the award. GV has had a great year but still has those mental lapses where he is to aggressive and gives the ball away. That's going to hurt them in the tournament if he want to show off.

Here's a link to ACC stats:

http://www.theacc.com/sports/m-baskbl/stats/2009-2010/confldrs.html#conf.wki

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. If Duke wins the ACC then Scheyer will probably take the award. GV has had a great year but still has those mental lapses where he is to aggressive and gives the ball away. That's going to hurt them in the tournament if he want to show off.

Here's a link to ACC stats:

http://www.theacc.com/sports/m-baskbl/stats/2009-2010/confldrs.html#conf.wki

I think Vasquez should win it regardless, but I also know how the Tobacco Road voters tend to stick with their own down there.

Scheyer averages four minutes more per game than Vasquez yet Vasquez is beating him in most categories.

BTW, in case anyone was wondering, there is no doubt in my mind that Vasquez's jersey goes up in the rafters after the season. He's become that "go-to" guy this season and now that he's red hot, he's carrying the team.

He just needs to keep it up through the ACC to cement his legacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Vasquez should win it regardless, but I also know how the Tobacco Road voters tend to stick with their own down there.

Scheyer averages four minutes more per game than Vasquez yet Vasquez is beating him in most categories.

BTW, in case anyone was wondering, there is no doubt in my mind that Vasquez's jersey goes up in the rafters after the season. He's become that "go-to" guy this season and now that he's red hot, he's carrying the team.

He just needs to keep it up through the ACC to cement his legacy.

Well, Greivis is also asked to do a lot more and MD hasn't had the schedule Duke has had either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scheyer averages four minutes more per game than Vasquez yet Vasquez is beating him in most categories.
I'm in full support of Vasquez' candidacy for ACC POY, but I would think that playing more is a testament to a player, not a reason to knock them. When it comes to POY type voting, I don't care about per-minute stats, I can about what a guy is able to do to help his team win, and if a guy that can play more minutes at peak level then he is helping his team more.

I have no doubt that Vasquez could average 35+ mpg and handle it physically, its just that we haven't needed him at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who has been very critical of Greivis at times and in general believes he has been overrated by most Maryland fans in recent years, I believe he is the leading candidate right now. He has been outstanding in ACC play and has had a much more efficient year. His A/T, FG % and 3pt% are all at career highs after a very slow start to the season. Most importantly, it's translating to victories. He has certainly been the most valuable player to his team in the league this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His slow start had nothing to do with him struggling. He was trying to get his teammates scoring early in the season like Williams and Hayes because we needed them to get confidence. We were playing bum teams and we didn't need him to score 20 a game. Now that we are playing better competition he has been dominant and he single handedly won us the NC St. game.

One edge you have to give Scheyer is that he is better defensively. :rofl:I mean he can hand check you to midcourt so you can never get into your offense. Best on the ball defender in the nation. At least until he gets into the tourney and loses to VCU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His slow start had nothing to do with him struggling. He was trying to get his teammates scoring early in the season like Williams and Hayes because we needed them to get confidence. We were playing bum teams and we didn't need him to score 20 a game. Now that we are playing better competition he has been dominant and he single handedly won us the NC St. game.

One edge you have to give Scheyer is that he is better defensively. :rofl:I mean he can hand check you to midcourt so you can never get into your offense. Best on the ball defender in the nation. At least until he gets into the tourney and loses to VCU.

He was absolutely struggling to start the year. Here are his numbers through the first 12 games.

FG: 68/166 .409%

3PT: 19/58 .327%

PPS: 1.21

A/TO: 1.9

Here are his numbers in the 13 games since. Keep in mind 11 of these games have been ACC games.

FG: 96/200 .480%

3PT: 32/69 .463%

PPS:1.35

A/T: 1.8

Now granted, the number he has put up in the last 13 games have extremely good but at the same time the numbers he put up in the first 12 games, against worse competetion, are pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was absolutely struggling to start the year. Here are his numbers through the first 12 games.

FG: 68/166 .409%

3PT: 19/58 .327%

PPS: 1.21

A/TO: 1.9

Here are his numbers in the 13 games since. Keep in mind 11 of these games have been ACC games.

FG: 96/200 .480%

3PT: 32/69 .463%

PPS:1.35

A/T: 1.8

Now granted, the number he has put up in the last 13 games have extremely good but at the same time the numbers he put up in the first 12 games, against worse competetion, are pretty bad.

Just means he rises to the occasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I find it interesting that the O’s are getting press for showing interest in RP these last few hours/days. Normally we find news when something actually happens (after the fact). This could be a good sign, if Agents are putting the news out there to draw more contract interest in the players they serve, since we know how tight-lipped ME and company can be.  The flip side is that the O’s get priced out on good acquisitions!    this should be an interesting offseason, more so than the last 5+ years.
    • ...unless we include Bautista in the trade [the plot thickens...]
    • Haha.  Too funny.  When did I ever say he didn’t have elite stuff?  I asked how you could call him a “high end” reliever.   Great. Fangraphs calls him a weapon at the back of any bullpen.  Big deal.     His results aren’t elite. Even last year.  His career whip is something like 1.3 which is where it was last year.  He gave up almost a hit per inning and he’s walked about 4.5-5 per 9 innings which is exactly what he did last year unless you want to hug the 8 walks in 24 IP with Toronto.  
    • Hi RZ, Sorry, didn't mean to direct that at you.  I just found his misuse of hypthetical ironic. 
    • ERA? Really? Lifetime ERA for a back of the BP reliever? Who just turned 27? OK. He doesn't have an elite lifetime ERA. I think I'm ok with that.  Just for comparison, Pete Fairbanks, Tampa's closer, has a lifetime ERA of 3.21. He any good?
    • Hicks gets wildly underrated on this board considering his youth and pure stuff.
    • From Fangraphs: "Possibly the best right-handed reliever on the market, Hicks’ sales pitch is simple: He might have the fastest fastball ever to reach free agency. But his case is further bolstered by his 2023 season, which might have been his most complete season yet statistically speaking. He made 65 regular season appearances between the Cardinals and Blue Jays with a 3.29 ERA, 3.22 FIP, and 3.36 xFIP, striking out a career-high 28.4% of batters faced. He allowed just nine barrels on 168 batted balls (5.4%) and an average exit velocity of just 86.7 mph – good for the 89th percentile league-wide. On those balls in play, 58.9% were on the ground, a 96th-percentile clip and yet somehow below his career average. As it turns out, strikeouts and soft groundballs are a potent combination." It goes on to address that he walks too many guy, as I have already addressed, before concluding:"Hicks has had his own ups and downs, but he’s an undeniable weapon for the back end of any bullpen." Now if you want to argue that he is asking more than you are willing to pay, fine. I get it. But don't tell me he doesn't have elite stuff. He does what you want a back end guy to do. He gets Ks and GB. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...