Jump to content

TT: Front Office changes coming: Stockstills to change positions


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Maybe it will be a Steinbrenner-esque transfer of power. Even though PA is not as vocal and public as George Steinbrenner, the shift from George to his son(s) was very smooth and slick.

I am wondering if this is what will happen provided that Angelos is preparing some form of exit strategy?

MSK

Well Tony said it would be a good thing, and John Angelos taking over is not a good thing by any means.

My guess would be Klentak is going to take on more of a role and promoted as VP of Baseball Operations preparing for MacPhail's exit after 2011 to be commissioner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

"Front Office changes coming"

Conjecture is fun sometimes. However I don't think that Tony-OH would throw anyone in ownership under the bus like that.

Here- This is your Front Office. Who would you suspect?

http://baltimore.orioles.mlb.com/team/front_office.jsp?c_id=bal

Also I don't think Tony-OH would cater to ownership. Just not disrespect it. I think someone already named who it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they plan on restructuring their PR and marketing departments? Or maybe adding in some younger guys with some sabermetric analytical background.

I really hope the warehouse becomes a lot less gray-haired.

MSK

You bring up a good point with the bolded. I would be curious to know how the FO approaches this facet of the game.

The O's did hire Kiley McDaniel at the end of last year, and I believe that he has a SABREmetric background.

And we don't know who else may be anonymously toiling over spreadsheets in the back office.

Matt Klentak is the right age, but I don't know whether he has the background in analysis that other execs of his generation seem to have. Klentak is the key figure here, I think. He seems to be getting more responsibility, and I think he has MacPhail's ear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Front Office changes coming"

Conjecture is fun sometimes. However I don't think that Tony-OH would throw anyone in ownership under the bus like that.

Here- This is your Front Office. Who would you suspect?

http://baltimore.orioles.mlb.com/team/front_office.jsp?c_id=bal

Also I don't think Tony-OH would cater to ownership. Just not disrespect it. I think someone already named who it is.

Ownership change is a whole other level above front office.

One or both of the Stockstills would be most likely, I think. Didn't we hear rumblings of a disconnect between the scouting side and the development guys? And international scouting has hardly been a paragon of excellence.

Still, my guess is Dave Stockstill (development). I think Scouting wins any argument between him and Joe Jordan and/or Lee MacPhail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elaborate.

I don't know much about John.

He runs the O's business side of things. And he was directly in charge of the Orioles ST fiasco and why they were in Lauderdale for so long.

SG would be a better person to ask and I'm sure he could tell you all about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He runs the O's business side of things. And he was directly in charge of the Orioles ST fiasco and why they were in Lauderdale for so long.

SG would be a better person to ask and I'm sure he could tell you all about him.

I don't know that it is fair to blame what happened in Lauderdale on anyone in particular. They had a deal with Lauderdale all worked out 2 or 3 years ago, and then the FAA threw a monkey wrench into the plan. That's not the fault of anyone on the Orioles. Anyway, the deal they ultimately did work out with Sarasota looks like it is spectacular, and there's no saying they could have worked out that same deal 2-3 years ago. Sometimes you have to be patient in negotiations to get the best possible deal. I'm not saying they couldn't have worked out a similar deal with some city a few years back, but it's not guaranteed that they could have. And this is a lot of money we are talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. This is so vague it is not even worth speculating what changes are coming.

Frobby, I think that you may have hit on it in your Bordick thread when you highlighted this line from the article:

After experiencing a lack of fundamentals at the big league level in 2009, an organizational decision was made that things had to change from rookie level on up.

If the O's see the fundamentals problems of 2009 as an organization-wide development issue, that falls at the feet of the Director of Player Development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A lot of teams are pretty injured and have worse depth than us. I'm not saying that's the reason, but it's a reason to believe maybe we can maintain our offense throughout the season better than other teams. 
    • This is probably as close to clicking on all cylinders as most teams get.  In any given 24-game period, some guys will be up and others down.  We have 9 players with an OPS+ of 116 or higher.  The four guys you mentioned will have hotter periods, and someone else will be cold then.  That’s baseball.  But the ratio of hot players to cold ones is really good right now. 
    • I don’t see it.  Project guy.  Good upside but can’t see that in the first round. I think they go corner with the first pick unless someone unexpectedly drops. The assumption has been Oline but I think the draft is so deep and so many teams will be taking tackles that the Ravens will elect to wait until later in the draft to get Oline and WR help. Its not a deep corner draft, so getting one early makes sense. If they trade up, I wouldn’t think they trade anything higher than a 4th..could move up 3-6 spots. Trade back will likely get them a pick for next year.
    • Gunnar is our Kyle Tucker but at a more premium position.  
    • I said Gunnar earlier. Before this season, I could have seen a case for Adley.  And I love Adley, great hitter (I don't think he's ever going to be a big power guy, but plate approach, contact, key hits, he's great) leader, heart and soul, etc.   But it's clearly Gunnar.  I didn't expect him to be this good, this fast.  He's separating himself from the rest of the pack, not only on this team but throughout the league. Whether or not an extension can happen is a different story altogether.  But Gunnar's the guy I'd go with first.
    • It is early, but the O's have some clear holes that will prevent a World Series run this season. And it looks like there are some teams playing there way out of contention already, barring a massive improvement in performance, making them likely sellers. At a quick glance, here are the teams that already could be looking to sell at the deadline. Some teams on the list made some offseason moves that signaled they are looking to compete. But early returns aren't looking good, and now they have an old team with pieces someone may find helpful, and without much talent in the pipeline. Tier 1 Losers Rockies White Sox Marlins Tier 2  - Not Looking Good Oakland Giants Angels Astros Cardinals Nationals I haven't really taken much look at the rosters to see what pieces could help us. So, who is selling? And Which of their pitchers have a chance to be on the market?  
    • I still feel like our offense isn't clicking on all cylinders yet. Santander has been down, Adley hasn't found alot of extra base power, Holliday has been a black hole so far, Hays was bad and now injured, Urias hasn't hit well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...