Jump to content

Bloody Weekend for top ranked teams...


geschinger

Recommended Posts

I think we see more shakeup by the time the new BCS standings come out....Here are some upsets i am looking at:

VT over BC(upset only by rankings, not reality)

Penn St over Ohio St.

USC over Oregon...Again, upset only by rankings

Texas A & M over Kansas

Rutgers over WVU

That is 5 top 10 teams losing again and Cal could certainly go into ASU and win as well.

Lots of really good games and huge games for the BCS standings.

By the next BCS standings, i think you see LSU/Oklahoma as the new championship game....If ASU beats Cal, they will be in instead of Oklahoma but i think OU will be closing fast.

VT, Florida and USC will all vault into the top 5 if ASU losing and the top 6 if they win.

Well, i am 0-2...WVU is cruising now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 855
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well, i am 0-2...WVU is cruising now.

I think WVU is a very good team, but they don't have any real good wins. Today at Rutgers, and at MD, who is at best middle tier ACC team are their two best wins. Not impressive at all. Their loss isn't looking nearly as good now either, South Florida is losing 16-0 to UConn right now. Margin has been impressive for them though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think WVU is a very good team, but they don't have any real good wins. Today at Rutgers, and at MD, who is at best middle tier ACC team are their two best wins. Not impressive at all. Their loss isn't looking nearly as good now either, South Florida is losing 16-0 to UConn right now. Margin has been impressive for them though.

But they may play for the NC because other teams may fall.

WVU has a few tough games left but 3 of last 4 are at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they may play for the NC because other teams may fall.

WVU has a few tough games left but 3 of last 4 are at home.

It's possible, but would just do more to show a playoff is needed. They can easily finish the year without beating one team that finishes in the top 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Oregon has a good chance at winning out, and if they do, they'll probably play in the title game imo.

They looked pretty impressive today.

They have ASU at home next week which could set up to be a monster game if ASU wins tonight.

It will probably come down to Oregon at UCLA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top ranked florida teams just went down, South Florida to UConn and UF to Geogia. Maybe USF is not on their way to becoming an elite program, and maybe their just not that good of a team this year, and maybe the Big East isn't nearly as great as some have made it out to be. Looks like they won't be getting 2 BCS bowl games like Gesh said would happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible, but would just do more to show a playoff is needed. They can easily finish the year without beating one team that finishes in the top 25.

If it would take a team getting into the top two w/o a win against a end of season top 25 team to show people a playoff is needed those people were/are clueless. The evidence is overwhelming and has been for some time that college football needs a playoff.

Michigan has been playing better lately so maybe they'll run the table until November 17th, but if they don't OSU won't need any help to be playing for a national title w/o beating one team that finishes in the top 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top ranked florida teams just went down, South Florida to UConn and UF to Geogia. Maybe USF is not on their way to becoming an elite program, and maybe their just not that good of a team this year, and maybe the Big East isn't nearly as great as some have made it out to be. Looks like they won't be getting 2 BCS bowl games like Gesh said would happen.

Devastating blow for the USF, the weather really neutralized their speed advantage. The expectation of two BCS teams dies although as a positive, WVU now controls their own destiny to win the conference. But top to bottom, the quality of the BEast is beind recognized. The USF loss may hurt a lot, but coming into this weekend, the BEast had made it up all the way to being the number two conference in the land to this point in the season. So even after a tough couple of weeks for the teams at the top it still is a lot better conference than some have made it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it would take a team getting into the top two w/o a win against a end of season top 25 team to show people a playoff is needed those people were/are clueless. The evidence is overwhelming and has been for some time that college football needs a playoff.

Michigan has been playing better lately so maybe they'll run the table until November 17th, but if they don't OSU won't need any help to be playing for a national title w/o beating one team that finishes in the top 25.

I don't think OSU will make the title game, but if they do, I think at least one of UM/Penn State/Wisconsin will end the regular season ranked.

Concerning the first paragraph, my point is it could be a wakeup call to those who like the current system. But UConn will now likely finish the regular season ranked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devastating blow for the USF, the weather really neutralized their speed advantage. The expectation of two BCS teams dies although as a positive, WVU now controls their own destiny to win the conference. But top to bottom, the quality of the BEast is beind recognized. The USF loss may hurt a lot, but coming into this weekend, the BEast had made it up all the way to being the number two conference in the land to this point in the season. So even after a tough couple of weeks for the teams at the top it still is a lot better conference than some have made it out to be.

I don't think the Sagarin rating are the end all be all to this discussion as you seem to. Having the Big East over the Pac-10 is absurd imo. It's a conference with only one really good team, who as I said, hasn't really beaten anyone, and only 2 teams I'd even consider to be good after that. As of now, that Auburn win is probably making a huge difference for them considering they haven't played many other big out of conference games.

Besides the USF win at Auburn, what good out of conference wins does the Big East have? And I think most of the Big East schools aren't established enough or talented enough to think that highly of without having big wins.

BTW, are any of the other Big East schools going to eventually join the Big East in football? I know Villanova and GTown have teams, not sure about most of those other schools.

If the ACC could drop Duke and I guess NC State, they'd look a lot better too.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think OSU will make the title game, but if they do, I think at least one of UM/Penn State/Wisconsin will end the regular season ranked.

Michigan is most likely if they run the table before OSU. For OSU to make it to the title game, they have to give Wisconsin who is unranked now, another loss so I think it's unlikely they make it back into the rankings. I guess PSU has a chance as well as I don't think they play anyone after tonight.

Depending on how far VT drops I think BC also has a chance to make it through the year w/o beating a EOS T25 team. After seeing VT against BC and earlier against the Carolinas I am convinced their ranking was the result of a weak schedule and think they'll lose at least one maybe two more games.

Concerning the first paragraph, my point is it could be a wakeup call to those who like the current system. But UConn will now likely finish the regular season ranked.

It would be nice, but probably wishful thinking. But for the good of the game, I say, let's find out w/WVU as the guinea pig. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...