Jump to content

Blame MacPhail


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

I think it's kind of amazing how people equate spending money on free agents directly with winning.

Like it's not possible to win without high priced free agents.

It's not possible to win without premium talent.

As I've stated, they don't necessarily have to be paid like $20 million per season/$100 million+ contract players, but they have to produce like one would.

Right now the Orioles do not have that type of positional player, yet. And they won't be winning anything until they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 294
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think the point was that there hasn't been much difference between them THIS year (thus far).

Since this thread was started obviously as a reaction to the 1-11 start, you have to take into consideration that even if we had signed Matt Holiday, it's not unlikely that we would have started...1-11. Thus leading to the same knee jerk reactions, and yet we would have done exactly what the OP was asking.

If we had Holliday's offense, I think we would have won at least 1 or 2 more games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not possible to win without premium talent.

As I've stated, they don't necessarily have to be paid like $20 million per season/$100 million+ contract players, but they have to produce like one would.

Right now the Orioles do not have that type of positional player, yet. And they won't be winning anything until they do.

The Orioles need to be going after the young premium guys that aren't established...Push for Smoak or someone along those lines...would much rather overpay for a guy like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles need to be going after the young premium guys that aren't established...Push for Smoak or someone along those lines...would much rather overpay for a guy like that.

I'd love to see that, but it's going to take trading Chris Tillman and/or Jake Arrieta to do that.

Maybe not both, but teams value their young positional players more that they used to.

The key was to draft it, and the Orioles failed to do that, choosing HS players instead that are at least 3-4 years away.

After Wieters, they dropped the ball on drafting young ML ready positional talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles need to be going after the young premium guys that aren't established...Push for Smoak or someone along those lines...would much rather overpay for a guy like that.
Smoak being a premium guy is very much in doubt though. Paying for established guys through free agency is sometimes better. Depends on what you'd have to give up for Smoak and what you think he'll become. Both approaches have their risks.

I really want us to go hard after Pena in the offseason. I think he'd be a near perfect addition, and his slightly older age should keep him limited to a 4-5 year deal at absolute max, maybe as short as 3 years. And, we wouldn't have to wait for him to adjust like we may with a younger player (or going with Snyder). It may have some negative implications on the back end, but I think we should be close enough to contending next year that the addition of Pena is felt immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see that, but it's going to take trading Chris Tillman and/or Jake Arrieta to do that.

Maybe not both, but teams value their young positional players more that they used to.

The key was to draft it, and the Orioles failed to do that, choosing HS players instead that are at least 3-4 years away.

After Wieters, they dropped the ball on drafting young ML ready positional talent.

And that's a deal we need to make IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smoak being a premium guy is very much in doubt though. Paying for established guys through free agency is sometimes better. Depends on what you'd have to give up for Smoak and what you think he'll become. Both approaches have their risks.

I really want us to go hard after Pena in the offseason. I think he'd be a near perfect addition, and his slightly older age should keep him limited to a 4-5 year deal at absolute max, maybe as short as 3 years. And, we wouldn't have to wait for him to adjust like we may with a younger player (or going with Snyder). It may have some negative implications on the back end, but I think we should be close enough to contending next year that the addition of Pena is felt immediately.

Maybe in your mind....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see that, but it's going to take trading Chris Tillman and/or Jake Arrieta to do that.

Maybe not both, but teams value their young positional players more that they used to.

The only pitcher in the minor league system I would not move for Smoak is Zach Britton. I'd trade Tillman and Erbe today for him, but would much prefer sending Tillman and Snyder for him. I doubt they'd do it, but I would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smoak being a premium guy is very much in doubt though. Paying for established guys through free agency is sometimes better. Depends on what you'd have to give up for Smoak and what you think he'll become. Both approaches have their risks.

I really want us to go hard after Pena in the offseason. I think he'd be a near perfect addition, and his slightly older age should keep him limited to a 4-5 year deal at absolute max, maybe as short as 3 years. And, we wouldn't have to wait for him to adjust like we may with a younger player (or going with Snyder). It may have some negative implications on the back end, but I think we should be close enough to contending next year that the addition of Pena is felt immediately.

I understand what you are saying, and I'm not against going after Pena at all next off season, but if Smoak was available, he's a guy the Orioles should covet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only pitcher in the minor league system I would not move for Smoak is Zach Britton. I'd trade Tillman and Erbe today for him, but would much prefer sending Tillman and Snyder for him. I doubt they'd do it, but I would.

Now that he's caught fire, I doubt the Rangers move Smoak for anybody less than Matusz himself.

He is going to be their new Teixeira.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW with Pie's injury, and Reimold's gimpyness, Matt Holliday looks a lot better now doesn't he?

That's why you don't wait for the perfect fit because things will work out.

You need to acquire talent when you can get it.

We may have to pursue Jayson Werth this offseason now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • Over the 35.33 innings of his last six starts, Dean Kremer has given up only 10 earned runs for an ERA of 2.55. In four of those starts, he's gone 6 to 6.33 innings.
    • I'm glad he's on our side.
    • Thanks for sharing. I've been wanting to see something just like this about Felix.
    • Oooooh. Didn't expect that recall. I'm excited to see it! Bruce has been grinding it out a long time in Norfolk. He started the season looking good, and he started 2022 looking good against Major League talent. Can he peform in June 2023 the way that he performed in April 2022? I hope so. I'm here to see it! I like the idea of left handed starters. Because we have none in the rotation and I want to see 2 good ones sprinkled in. I've got my popcorn, and I'm looking forward to seeing what Bruce Zimmerman can do!
    • Let's start with Ramirez... 1) He'll be 31 in September 2) He's signed thru 2028 3) There is $105M remaining on his contract for 2024-28, for baseball ages 31-35 (he'll be 36 when the contract ends 4) His power production has dropped dramatically in 2023 despite the fact his FB rate has increased 5) His overall offensive production is the lowest it has been since 2015 (age 22) I think the Indians might be happy to offload this contract if they could find a taker to give them some minimal value for it and they are not in contention. My conclusion: If the Orioles like him for the money over the next 5 years, he might be worth a 3-for-1 exchange of truly unknow prospect potential, but not Westburg, Cowser, or GrayRod.  Think 1 of Prieto OR Willems plus 2 more hard throwers from Delmarva.  I would be seriously concerned about how a contract like Ramirez' would constrain the Orioles from signing Rutschman or Henderson to the sort of extension that will make them career Orioles.  Just like in football, where fans are tossing out 2nd round draft picks like they were party favors, I really dislike trading any top 100 prospect and certainly not one that comes with a strong possibility for an over-market priced contract. Bieber... 1) He's 28 as of 5/31 2) This is his worst season since his rookie year with a depressed K rate, increased BB and over 1 hit/IP, but he's still hanging in with an ERA that is somewhat better than the league average. 3) He's making $10M this season and will have his final year of arbitration prior to 2024, which makes the cost of him with a 1.5 year horizon bearable if you can assume he'll maintain his current 110 ERA+.  In addition, given the short horizon and age, that's a much smaller risk than for Ramirez. 4) This is where ME and his team come in to see if they can identify WHY he's not pitching nearly as well this season in addition to the obvious "Will he put the Orioles over the top?" My conclusion: Bieber may well be sought after, but I wouldn't trade any of Westburg, Cowser, or GrayRod for him.  I'd probably be willing to trade either Rom OR Ortiz plus another couple of live arms from the lower minors.  Westburg plus 2 Delmarva arms for both Ramirez and Bieber would be an enormous risk (see Ramirez), but I could get behind it if ME and team have decided he won't be nearly the offensive threat he is now in Camden Yards.
    • I have no idea how the management works here.  I think the Chris Davis fiasco is still a constant shadow. However, we're tied for the second most wins in all of baseball.  Which is astounding given our stat line.  The Giants stats are almost identical to ours and they're a game under 500.  That's where our stats say we should be.   So something else is going on.  I don't think management is going to mess with the chemistry,  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...