Jump to content

Arrieta says he is ready for the bigs


jiminnj

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I like this part:

A lot of guys once they get to the big leagues - I talked to [brian] Matusz about this, he said that he tried to change his whole approach rather than doing what he did in the minor leagues. I think I've got to use that advice when I do get there so I continue to have success like I have in the minor leagues.

It's good to see the young guys helping each other out, so one can learn from the other's mistakes. Arrieta obviously has great respect for Matusz, this is at least the second time he has referrred to Matusz in an interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see him get the Start on Saturday, Let Bergensen get a few more starts down in Norfolk and get his confidence and momentum going before we bring him back up.

Agreed. His numbers are unreal right now. Let's see what hes got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with bringing up Arrieta -- he is not on the 40-man roster, so if he comes up, someone is going to have to be put through waivers. And, if he goes back down at any point, we've burned one of his options. Bergesen is already on the 40-man, and his option for 2010 is burned already. So, merits aside, it will be tempting to bring Bergy back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with bringing up Arrieta -- he is not on the 40-man roster, so if he comes up, someone is going to have to be put through waivers. And, if he goes back down at any point, we've burned one of his options. Bergesen is already on the 40-man, and his option for 2010 is burned already. So, merits aside, it will be tempting to bring Bergy back.

This is the tough call of the week to me. Bergy may need one more start to show he has his mojo back, and I kind of want to see Arrieta get his shot right now, while the team is trying to rebound from the horrific start.

It makes logistical sense to go with Bergy, but my inner Oriole wants to see the Arrieta first. All that, and I'm not ready to push Hernandez out of the rotation.

Tough choices.

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with bringing up Arrieta -- he is not on the 40-man roster, so if he comes up, someone is going to have to be put through waivers. And, if he goes back down at any point, we've burned one of his options. Bergesen is already on the 40-man, and his option for 2010 is burned already. So, merits aside, it will be tempting to bring Bergy back.

I think that's a minor problem, and not enough to keep him down. He's going to be up at some point this year, he's got the hot hand now and he's earned the shot. I think it would be in his and Bergy's best interests if Arrieta got the call on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always loved Arrieta's mentality. All objective analysis aside, it will be nice to get someone on the mound in orange in black who's a little bit mean and a little bit cocky. We have some very talented pitchers, but I'm not quite sure any of them are truly intimidating, if that makes sense.

Of course, I'll take a guy with Matusz' talent who looks like your next door neighbor in the suburbs when you were 15, but I'm looking forward to seeing Arrieta come after hitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with bringing up Arrieta -- he is not on the 40-man roster, so if he comes up, someone is going to have to be put through waivers. And, if he goes back down at any point, we've burned one of his options. Bergesen is already on the 40-man, and his option for 2010 is burned already. So, merits aside, it will be tempting to bring Bergy back.

Actually, if Bergesen is recalled for Saturday and isnt optioned again for the season, the option wouldn't have actually been used since the assignment has to total 20 days or more in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always loved Arrieta's mentality. All objective analysis aside, it will be nice to get someone on the mound in orange in black who's a little bit mean and a little bit cocky. We have some very talented pitchers, but I'm not quite sure any of them are truly intimidating, if that makes sense.

Of course, I'll take a guy with Matusz' talent who looks like your next door neighbor in the suburbs when you were 15, but I'm looking forward to seeing Arrieta come after hitters.

You mean like Daniel Cabrera? He threw hard, snarled a lot and wasn't afriad to hit someone.

I understand your point but I'd be thrilled if we had 5 guys like Brian Matusz.

What they say or their expression means zippo to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean like Daniel Cabrera? He threw hard, snarled a lot and wasn't afriad to hit someone.

I understand your point but I'd be thrilled if we had 5 guys like Brian Matusz.

What they say or their expression means zippo to me.

The 2 aren't mutually exclusive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...