Jump to content

One problem with our draft so far


Recommended Posts

We need to find room in our budget, come hell or high water. No point in speculating right now who will be available when our time comes to pick, but when our turn arrives, I'd be interested in your thoughts as to who's out there.

I'll definitely poke my head in tonight. The actual draft time is a little hectic for me, as I am running live coverage at my site, so probably will not be able to partake in convo over here in addition to my own coverage. I'll also be speaking with Jon at CamdenDepot to help with some "Shadow Picks" for the O's, so if/when excitement dies down here you could poke your head over there to see who we thought to be good targets for picks 3:3 - 10:3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is not good news for the O's.

We may have gotten the best player out of all the other AL East teams combined, but because of our inability to develop our own talent (regardless of how good it is) -- combined with the other teams ability to do just that -- and the amount of players all the other teams took in the draft -- makes this just another bad news scenario from 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't get mentioned often, but that Gregg Zaun trade looks a lot worse when you consider the Rays also got the 42nd pick in the draft as a result of it.

I'd certainly prefer that pick as opposed to Rhyne Hughes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
    • I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
    • Left the game with 1 run in and 2 on ,2 outs in the 6th and Akin gave up both runs. Bad luck tonight in my opinion but I'm sure there are many on here will say he sucks and should be replaced. 
    • Yeah, we're kind of getting off track here since this is a Jackson Holliday thread, but I will say I don't see how Mountcastle gets traded -- and even if he did it would be to unblock Mayo and not Kjerstad.  Both Mounty and Mayo are righties, and it doesn't look like Mayo will play third base anytime soon.  I think two of the prospects need to get traded -- maybe in the offseason or next season -- unless Hays, O'Hearn or Mounty are dealt.  I think there's a chance the O's bring back Santander, but that's a big wildcard too.
    • I was in favor of trading one of Mountcastle/Hays/Santander after last year to make room for prospects like Kjerstad. I see the main issue with trading one of the above or O'Hearn is those players will deliver more value in an Orioles uniform over the return in any trade. I'm leaning towards Elias taking a calculated risk and creating at bats for Kjerstad.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...