Jump to content

Houston Making Significant Offer for Tejada


33rdst

Recommended Posts

Who did they make their case to beforehand and when did they make it?

Where can I find these slot guidlines ?

From:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/2005draft/crasnick2.html

Now all that’s left is settling on a figure. The advent of “slot money,” a system of forced financial certainty decreed by the commissioner’s office, has all but removed the art of negotiation from the process. The scouting director who wants to pay above slot must get approval from his general manager and possibly his owner, then outline his reasoning with a representative from commissioner Bud Selig’s office, who probably will try to dissuade the owner from spending the money.

Teams get fined if they "skip" going trhough the commissioners office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply
From:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/2005draft/crasnick2.html

Teams get fined if they "skip" going trhough the commissioners office.

But if they go "through" the commisioner's office, they don't get fined. According to the article, the commissioner's office tries to "dissuade" them from spending the money, but has no authority to stop them if they choose. In other words, If Pete wanted to pay Weaver over the slot money, he just had to go "through" the commisioners office to do so. MLB, isn't going to tell a team to forfeit its 1st round pick by not paying a player what it takes to get him signed. Right ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if they go "through" the commisioner's office, they don't get fined. According to the article, the commissioner's office tries to "dissuade" them from spending the money, but has no authority to stop them if they choose. In other words, If Pete wanted to pay Weaver over the slot money, he just had to go "through" the commisioners office to do so. MLB, isn't going to tell a team to forfeit its 1st round pick by not paying a player what it takes to get him signed. Right ?

Absolutely, they can present their case to the commisioners office and sign the guy to whatever sized deal they want to. But again, it's something that MLB does not want to happen. It benefited the Orioles this year as they ended up with Beato because the Mets were successfully (and suprisingly) dissuaded from signing him to a deal that would of been out of line w/MLB recommendations for someone picked where he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, they can present their case to the commisioners office and sign the guy to whatever sized deal they want to. But again, it's something that MLB does not want to happen. It benefited the Orioles this year as they ended up with Beato because the Mets were successfully (and suprisingly) dissuaded from signing him to a deal that would of been out of line w/MLB recommendations for someone picked where he was.

I don't think I want Bud Selig telling me how to run my team. Moreover, a control freak like Angelos definitely doesn't. That said, the Orioles drafted Townshend instead of Drew or Weaver because he was cheaper which was my original contention. :D

East coast time, hitting the sack.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I want Bud Selig telling me how to run my team. Moreover, a control freak like Angelos definitely doesn't. That said, the Orioles drafted Townshend instead of Drew or Weaver because he was cheaper which was my original contention. :D

East coast time, hitting the sack.....

Yep, Townsend was a "cheap" pick as was Markakis. However Angelos wasn't cheap when it came to getting Loewen signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, Townsend was a "cheap" pick as was Markakis. However Angelos wasn't cheap when it came to getting Loewen signed.

I thought that the provision that stipulated that Loewen had to be on the ML roster by '07 was the deal closer. He signed a day before he would've re-entered the draft. Somebody was creative to get that done, I'll give credit for that.

As far as Markakis, I thought we benefited from the frugality of Reds ownership the previous year that allowed us to nab him a year after he was originally drafted by them. It would be hard to think that the greek card didn't play a role either.

Another poster always points out what Mark Cuban says, " some owners hate to lose, some owners hate to lose money"

I think we know what category Petey falls under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that the provision that stipulated that Loewen had to be on the ML roster by '07 was the deal closer. He signed a day before he would've re-entered the draft. Somebody was creative to get that done, I'll give credit for that.

As far as Markakis, I thought we benefited from the frugality of Reds ownership the previous year that allowed us to nab him a year after he was originally drafted by them. It would be hard to think that the greek card didn't play a role either.

Another poster always points out what Mark Cuban says, " some owners hate to lose, some owners hate to lose money"

I think we know what category Petey falls under.

"For some some owners it hurts to lose, and for some owners it hurts to spend" -- Mark Cuban

<paraphrasing>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as Markakis, I thought we benefited from the frugality of Reds ownership the previous year that allowed us to nab him a year after he was originally drafted by them. It would be hard to think that the greek card didn't play a role either.

He was picked earlier than predicted and I believe he signed a below slot contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems the Anges are as reluctant to trade as us. But the Astros are apparently a real possiblity

Astros get Mig and Rlo (and maybe Javy)

O's get

Hirsch - key player (him Bedard, and Penn with Loewen and DCab) really would give us a strong stucture where we need it

Pence - LF possibility

Ensberg

Lane -

Patton -

(not wild about Everett, prefer to let Fahey play short, unless Everett can be flipped in a package with other players like Hawkins to Col for Shealy)

Not sure we could get it for this, but HIRSCH WOULD HAVE TO BE main part of the deal.

Who am I kidding? O's will do nothing, but it shows me that a team is more than one player, and you really need balance across the board. Tigers are showing that this year. Mig ain't getting any younger, and without shoring up the SP we ain't going anywhere in the foreseeable future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...