Jump to content

Rumor: O's in formal negotiations with Buck Showalter


ScottieBaseball

Recommended Posts

I think the manager role is much more critical on this Orioles team than many other baseball teams. This organization has lost it's "culture" or the "Oriole Way" of old and it does not have a clear leader on the playing field.

For these reasons, a strong manager needs to take these players back to square one and lead! Hopefully he can play a critical role in instilling confidence in these youngsters and teach them how to win.

I am on board with Buck being that guy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Someone else mentioned this, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Samuel remain on the staff, even past this season.

Someone else mentioned something to the effect that he may need time to organize a coaching staff. Based on my perception of him, I'm pretty sure he knows exactly who he wants on his staff, and has probably already talked to each of them (off the record, of course). He probably has a backup plan for each spot and a backup plan to the backup plan.

As for learning the system and the players on the current roster I'd bet that he's already talked to a lot of people about the organization and has read plenty of scouting reports.

He doesn't strike me as someone who enters into any controllable situation unprepared.

I've been thinking about this a lot lately, so I'll ask everyone here what they think. Would it be a good/bad idea to keep Samuel as a coach if Showalter is hired? You have to worry about the leadership clash, as the players seem to like Samuel a lot. Just wanted someone else's opinion on this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I like the idea of Showalter only watching the rest of the way, I can understand the flaws of that idea. Besides, what's to keep him from driving down to Bowie on an off day and taking in a game?

I agree with a lot of your post, but I did want to point out that this isn't realistic.

The Orioles have to be in town.

The BaySox have to be in town.

Showalter/the manager would need to have nothing else that needed to be done on that day.

He would probably want to see more of a team than he could in a single game to get a feel for the players.

You get the idea :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall reading that Trembley went to the occasional Bowie game.

I keep seeing that the manager does nothing but manage on game day - he shouldn't have things to do on his days off. :D

Seeing how they interact, and how they do the little things, and how they perform on the field for just one day is better than not seeing them at all.

Now maybe you get the idea.

Well, if I got my Orioles news solely from the OH Twitter account, that is better than not reading anything at all. But it's even better to come read the information actually on the site, no? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot has been written about this "idea" that it would be good to have Showalter just watch the rest of the reason and then take over in the offseason. One of the main things I see here is that no team does that, so therefore the Orioles shouldn't do it.

The way I look at it is that if ever there were a team/organization that could afford to try unconventional methods, it is the present day Orioles. If ever there were a team that could establish a four-man rotation, it is the Orioles. If ever there were a team that could attempt to set a new trend with a 10-man pitching staff and a bench full of offensive minded players, it is the Orioles. If ever there were a team...okay, you get my drift.

While I like the idea of Showalter only watching the rest of the way, I can understand the flaws of that idea. Besides, what's to keep him from driving down to Bowie on an off day and taking in a game? I'm assuming managers don't normally see the reports on minor league players that Hot Corner mentioned earlier. Well, why can't the Orioles try something different and provide Showalter with those same reports? He can be very involved, even as the manager.

If I'm the GM I take advantage of the knowledge Showalter surely has gained about other organizations in his current job and make a list of people I should go after from other organizations. I tell my development guys to work with Showalter and his choice for Pitching Coach (and with Griffin and Schmidt and McGregor [assuming they all remain in the organization]) to develop a program for developing pitchers. Have Showalter and his choice for Hitting Coach work with minor league coordinators do the same for developing hitters. Do the same with Showalter and Bordick for developing fielders (actually developing plans such as teaching fundamentals). During all of this, I work with Showalter and Jordan to determine what traits the organization will look for when it comes time to draft players. Yes, these are things you don't typically see managers involved in, but this also isn't your typical situation.

Showalter brings a different skillset to the table than a lot of managers (arguably more than any manager the Orioles have had since Davey Johnson), why not take advantage of those skills while he's here? They certainly have nothing to lose by doing so.

I agree with every word of this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never met DeMarlo Hale, but from what I've read and heard about him he seems to be a real good man. Assuming he doesn't get a much deserved manager's job I'd love to Showalter figure out a way to get him on his staff next season.

I've played 2 seasons with Hale. He will get a shot, he's a very good manager and players respond to him. He has a way about him that gets the most out of each player. He will jump your ass when you need it (He jumped mine several times :) ) and he will give you a pat on the backside when needed. But most of all, he fights for his players. And players respect that in a coach. Players will battle for a guy like that.

We had two teams that were loaded full of individuals. By the end of the first month we were all playing team ball and helping one another to get better. He has a way of getting EVERYONE on the same page.

He would do well here I know since there is such a young core of players. But at this point the O's are looking for more of a sure thing becaue they've been burned in the past with guys with not a lot of big league experience. And I really don't blame them for going in that direction. It would be a huge asset if he could pry away Hale from Boston. Not sure how that can be done since he's a bench coach right now. The only way ( I believe) he can break his contract is if he's offered a higher position with another organization. I could be wrong here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sooner the Orioles sign Showalter, the better. And put him in the dugout immediately. I think giving him half a season to watch things and evaluate is typical, plodding, and way too over-deliberate. He can easily evaluate things from the dugout, and he'd start having an impact much sooner. I'm fine with keeping Samuel on staff, especially since the players seem to respond to him and he's got the respect of everyone. There shouldn't be any leadership clash there since the players know even now that Samuel is an interim guy. But I'm sick of the dawdling.

It won't hurt to have Showalter go around to the different minor league facilities on his off days, or even when one team plays in the daytime and one at night. But he's a smart guy and this wouldn't be an unexpected thing for him. Hire him right now, put him in the dugout, and let him make changes to his staff/roster etc. as he sees fit, and when he can make it work. If he fires one coach and hires a new one on July 13th or July 31st, or August 31st, whatever.

But if he's the leader, let him lead. There's no need to keep treading water. It's just baseball, not a cabinet position with Obama. He knows what to do, and he'll know what needs to get done soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sooner the Orioles sign Showalter, the better. And put him in the dugout immediately. I think giving him half a season to watch things and evaluate is typical, plodding, and way too over-deliberate. He can easily evaluate things from the dugout, and he'd start having an impact much sooner. I'm fine with keeping Samuel on staff, especially since the players seem to respond to him and he's got the respect of everyone. There shouldn't be any leadership clash there since the players know even now that Samuel is an interim guy. But I'm sick of the dawdling.

It won't hurt to have Showalter go around to the different minor league facilities on his off days, or even when one team plays in the daytime and one at night. But he's a smart guy and this wouldn't be an unexpected thing for him. Hire him right now, put him in the dugout, and let him make changes to his staff/roster etc. as he sees fit, and when he can make it work. If he fires one coach and hires a new one on July 13th or July 31st, or August 31st, whatever.

But if he's the leader, let him lead. There's no need to keep treading water. It's just baseball, not a cabinet position with Obama. He knows what to do, and he'll know what needs to get done soon enough.

I just hope he has full control over who he wants on his coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with a lot of your post, but I did want to point out that this isn't realistic.

The Orioles have to be in town.

The BaySox have to be in town.

Showalter/the manager would need to have nothing else that needed to be done on that day.

He would probably want to see more of a team than he could in a single game to get a feel for the players.

You get the idea :)

BT, I also think it's important that we fix the system. As a Redskin fan, I understand what it's like to paint a pretty face on a bad organization and see short-term results followed by more failure.

When the Redskins brought in Joe Gibbs for his second stint, he improved things by having a hand in almost every part of the organization. They weren't world-beaters, but they went from horrible to 2 playoff appearances in 4 years...progress! The problem was that when he retired, so did all that improvement.

So, I'd rather Buck come in and help them correct some things and put the right guys in place to be the ones to scout and evaluate prospects. That way, when his time here is up, there's something we can retain as an organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • You do know that Urias has nowhere near enough value to obtain a starting pitcher on his on? He would need to be a part of a package that includes some valued prospects for an impact starter.  It sounds like you have the guys that you value in terms of prospects that you see as long term pieces. Of the prospects that we do posses which would you be willing to part with in order to acquire the type of pitching talent that we need and currently lack?
    • I don't think Elias will trade for a TOR starter at the deadline.   He has Wells, Gibson, Kremer and Bradish.     GRod will improve his command at AAA and be back.   They may keep him down there to limit his innings so he is ready for the playoffs.   Means is due back in August.  And Hall is an unknown at this point but not forgotten at least by me.  I think Irvin  may be in the rotation until GRod and Means are ready. What I think Elias will be looking for at the deadline in a veteran reliever or two.   And he will have young players to trade that don't fit in the O's future.  Stowers, Norby, Haskin  and Prieto to name a few.  The think Frazier could be traded. Westburg looks like the O's second baseman of the future to me.   And Kerstad is the RF/1B/DH that hits the heck out of the ball.
    • True, but all of them are on point to pitch more this year games and innings wise  (Well I'd have to check on innings for Perez). Five pitchers pitching in 70 or more games is unheard of as far as I can tell. Maybe the Orioles are trying something that's never been done before?  While I'm ok with giving them the benefit of the doubt, and I hope it works out for them for sure, I will remain concerned over the usage and point out times where they didn't need to use a guy.  I get out that guys like Cano need work because sinkerballers tend to get too strong when healthy and you want that late sink. Saying that, there are four other guys getting used pretty darn often as well.  I just don't think it's sustainable over the year, but I guess we're going to see.
    • Ok this is where we have a point of departure. I have seen absolutely no indication that John Angelo’s is interested in the Orioles winning let alone spending real money to keep/sign an impact starting pitcher. I will have to believe that when I see it.
    • How long are we staying with the DL Hall as a SP experiment?  For this season, and the future… it’s looking like we should just make Hall a full time reliever and see what we have. I’d rather make that call with Hall versus trading prospects for a guy like Aroldis Chapman. With our current formula for winning, we do need one more premium bullpen arm. 
    • Driving in runners has not been shown to be a repeatable skill other than that people who generally hit the ball well tend to be good at it
    • They've gotta be assuming a hot streak is right around the corner with the batted ball data. I'm not sure what else it could be at this point
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...