Jump to content

Decision 2010: Win Now or Rendon Later?


Sanfran327

Win Now or Rendon Later?  

171 members have voted

  1. 1. Win Now or Rendon Later?

    • Win Now
      102
    • Rendon Later
      69


Recommended Posts

Is anyone else feeling a little, um... bittersweet about this? I hate to say it, but I've gotten so used to the fact that this season is over. I realized this unfortunate reality at 2-16, then started looking ahead to the draft and the possibility of Rendon manning the hot corner for years to come.

Now we're winning some games, and that's always great to watch as a fan, but another unfortunate reality is that it's just too little too late. We're only one game 'ahead' in the top pick race, and I know that Pitt stinks more than we do. I don't see us ending up with the #1 pick next year.

I guess the question is whether or not you'd prefer a 100+ loss season and the top pick, or another 90 loss season, finishing dead last in the division again and 30 games out, and having a good-but-not-franchise-changing pick.

I think it's a tough decision as a fan. While I can see - and appreciate - the attitude that you can never root against your team if you're a true fan, the converse is that these wins are relatively meaningless, and all they're doing is lowering our draft position.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I can understand yours and others frustrations... but IMO how we finish this season is going to mean more than whether we get the #1 or #2 pick. For years now the O's have nose dived every single August/September. If we somehow manage to continue to play well during those months this year, it could help instill confidence heading into next season... especially if Buck is managing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as getting Rendon would be good, I'm not comfortable with the Orioles laying down for anybody. They should go out and give it their best. If they don't, then it's an insult to the game.

I'd never advocate throwing games under any circumstance. I'm just trying to gauge the mood around here. Is everyone still purely in 'I want this team to win right now' mode, or are folks beginning to look towards the future at this point?

Here's where I'm at: with each win, I'm 90% 'YEAH!' and 10% 'eh'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The realist says that no matter if we win and miss out, or we continue to be other-worldly bad, the end result is the young guys on the team gain experience and it, hopefully, sets us up for next season and beyond.

The fan in me, on the other hand, says losing sucks, and I hate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the wins were coming from Millwood or Guthrie, it would be one thing, but the wins are coming from Arrieta and Tillman. While I wish it would have been Wieters and Pie that won the game for us the other night, and not Patterson and Fox, at least have potential bench bats in the future playing well.

I'd rather the core win now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can never root for the to play badly or lose unless it came down to the last game of the season getting us a top pick or not. (One game I could make an exception). I am very surprised (pleasantly so) how good Corey Patterson is hitting right now. If he can continue like this Roberts isn't really missed other than his glove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Win now, that means our players are playing well. That simple. This should not even be an arguement.

Well, as Crazysilver pointed out, it kinda depends on who is winning the games. It's very encouraging that Tillman and Arrieta won back to back starts, but I could really care less what Millwood does for the rest of the way. I also think that this hot streak could be temporary, as Wigginton could be moved soon, as could Tejada, Millwood, Guts, and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not gonna matter what you want. I think it's clear with the maturation of the young pitchers we will go past the Astros and Pirates.

And that doesn't count Pie back, the addition of Fox (hopefully) and return to some semblance of what we thought with Wieters.

Plus maybe Roberts.

If we could only morph some of these players into defensive assets, althoughTejada today looked like a gold-glover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Sports Guy- Isn't attendance becoming more of a  legacy statistic similar to Avg v. OPS?  It's a very different era than 1965 when there were few suites or "premium" seating and hardly any amenities beyond a beer and hot dog.  Today a seat and it's attachment rate are not comparable between say NY and KC-and we've seen the leverage of corporate sponsorship with TRP.  In the Warehouse I would think growing attachment rate and corporate partners would at some point have comparable priority as a revenue driver.  Seat sales account only ~20% of revenue and shrinking,  The revenue tilt is upgrading fans/corps. to a premium seat at an average of 4X the price.   Although this slide is from '22 it details the discrepancy between teams that can leverage premium seating and suites.  Playoff revenue is also likely in this slide which benefits teams like Houston. There is no real way I have found to judge revenue other than Forbes-just food for thought.  
    • The Mountcastle injury hasn't felt like a huge deal since we have a similarly-performing O'Hearn to slot into the same position.  But I think the lineup misses him. He is better than Eloy, Rivera, and the other guys his ABs are getting distributed to. And better defensively than O'Hearn.
    • There could be some interesting stuff to talk about here, or individual cases where what you're saying is true, but I think the short answer is no. Analytics are going to be more accurate overall than the old-school axioms-- the axioms that are provably true are probably still coached.   On point 1 we definitely have some players struggling to make adjustments and some of that may be that they're coached to hunt barrels at the expense of contact. The O's are built to maximize power and you can see that in their results (1st in SLG but 9th in AVG). Maybe a different approach could help some guys break out of a slump more easily, but it's hard to know because there are always struggling players no matter the coaching approach. Were the the Showalter O's missing old-school wisdom when they let Adam Jones continue whiffing on low and away sliders?  Point 2 I probably buy the least because pitching analytics across MLB have been so generally effective in helping players maximize their game. Probably there are ways the O's could be using their data better. Not every decision and result will be perfect. But analytics is golden for pitchers.  On point 3, is there any reason to think the O's are generally weak on defensive fundamentals compared to most teams? Gunnar had his recent error binge but that's all I can think of and that seemed more like a personal thing to me. 
    • To be fair, out of 434 batters with more than 100 PA’s, Norby is tied for 2nd in terms of wOBA - xwOBA. Not saying he wouldn’t be useful here, but his average exit velocity, Chase %, whose rate, K%, and BB% all look like they’re bottom 20th percentile. And his defense is very bad.  Again, he would be useful as a DH and obviously his hot streak would be nice, but not sure how sustainable it is. I’m more concerned that all their young guys are struggling and Norby has seen immediate results, sustainable or not. 
    • I've said for years that teams should spend for a minor league dietician and a chef for each team.  I'm not talking anything fancy but something healthy and free.
    • I bought a season ticket package this year for the first time since 2014. I have renewed for next year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...