Jump to content

Dan Connolly: Showalter will likely take over in the near future


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

Near future? What's that mean for MacPhail? Few months? Next spring?

Of course there's no timetable, there's never a freaking timetable with this guy.

Time...kills...all...deals.

Wait and see.

I live this all day every day as a car salesman. Its very true....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I wonder why we think our negotiations take so long? Do we have people who post here (and have that opinion) that track with such fervor the rumors, negotiations, botchings, and successes of other teams front offices?

Have we ever taken a step back and gone, maybe we're too close to the situation to be objective?

Maybe this is the rate that everything is done, and we just don't know any different?

Does anyone know how long the Jays were in talks with the Braves re: Escobar?

I was listening to Buster Olney on ESPN radio this morning talking about how White Sox GM Ken Williams will pull a quick trigger. Gave the example that negotiations can start on a Wednesday and be done on a Thursday. You know, the following day, not NEXT Thursday. ;)

No, dude...MacPhail is way slow. When you start reading reports of how deliberate he is, who do you think they're saying he's deliberate to in comparison?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The timetable of the managerial thing is going to be open ended. It's the first time going through an in-season process for me," MacPhail said. "I think once you get comfortable with a decision you make it. But you have to get there and you have to weigh all the options and look at all the information."

He is still weighing options and deciphering info. I wonder if D-Day had as much information and took as much time.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/al/2010-07-15-69263694_x.htm

Another quote from that article...

The Orioles might soon be performing for a new manager and with a depleted roster if MacPhail duplicates his 2009 veterans-for-prospects dealing spree at the trade deadline.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm still trying to catch my breath from last July...that was quite a whirlwind of activity! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another quote from that article...

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm still trying to catch my breath from last July...that was quite a whirlwind of activity! :rolleyes:

For MacPhail, two moves in a month (Sherril and Huff) is enough to cause him to need a four month vacation! :mwahaha:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was listening to Buster Olney on ESPN radio this morning talking about how White Sox GM Ken Williams will pull a quick trigger. Gave the example that negotiations can start on a Wednesday and be done on a Thursday. You know, the following day, not NEXT Thursday. ;)

No, dude...MacPhail is way slow. When you start reading reports of how deliberate he is, who do you think they're saying he's deliberate to in comparison?

The same Ken Williams who was blasted for pulling the quick trigger on Alex Rios?

Speed can work for you and against you. So can being deliberate.

Also, you just compared a tortoise to a hare. You used two guys on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. What about the middle ground?

No GM is going make great deals every time. Unless you are playing with a stacked deck ala New York, Boston, and LA.

I agree with you...I'd like to see MacPhail move a little faster but I definitely don't want him to turn into Ken Williams. Let's try a medium pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same Ken Williams who was blasted for pulling the quick trigger on Alex Rios?

Speed can work for you and against you. So can being deliberate.

Also, you just compared a tortoise to a hare. You used two guys on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. What about the middle ground?

No GM is going make great deals every time. Unless you are playing with a stacked deck ala New York, Boston, and LA.

I agree with you...I'd like to see MacPhail move a little faster but I definitely don't want him to turn into Ken Williams. Let's try a medium pace.

Even a medium pace would seem like "speeding" for AM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same Ken Williams who was blasted for pulling the quick trigger on Alex Rios?

Speed can work for you and against you. So can being deliberate.

Also, you just compared a tortoise to a hare. You used two guys on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. What about the middle ground?

No GM is going make great deals every time. Unless you are playing with a stacked deck ala New York, Boston, and LA.

I agree with you...I'd like to see MacPhail move a little faster but I definitely don't want him to turn into Ken Williams. Let's try a medium pace.

Ken Williams led the Sox to the world title in 2005.

I'll take my chances with Williams!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, he's slow, but you have absolutely 0 proof that it's he who is holding this up.

I'm just confused why there are so many "O's" fans in a constant state of negativity. Are you like this all day? Do you just sulk around your house mumbling and grumbling about Peter and Andy and 13 years and we coulda been a contenda?

I imagine you're wearing an old bath robe and boots. Sort of a cross between Howard Hawks and the guy who put the flaming bag of poop out on his front porch in Billy Madison.

I am a pretty positive person. But when it comes to the O's -- not so much.

Believe me, I wish I was like you and thought that everything was OK with the Orioles -- that they were doing fine.

That would mean I was pretty much insane, but hey, ignorance is bliss, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a pretty positive person. But when it comes to the O's -- not so much.

Believe me, I wish I was like you and thought that everything was OK with the Orioles -- that they were doing fine.

That would mean I was pretty much insane, but hey, ignorance is bliss, right?

I'm not ignorant. I know the Orioles are having dire problems. I also won't let them bring me down to the point of curmudgeonism.

I won't let them bring me down to the point where I refuse to go watch them play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not ignorant. I know the Orioles are having dire problems. I also won't let them bring me down to the point of curmudgeonism.

I won't let them bring me down to the point where I refuse to go watch them play.

When have I refused to watch them play? I still watch the games regularly.

I still am a fan of this team. Excuse me for criticizing a team that's 29-59 and has a GM who is slower than molasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same Ken Williams who was blasted for pulling the quick trigger on Alex Rios?

Speed can work for you and against you. So can being deliberate.

Also, you just compared a tortoise to a hare. You used two guys on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. What about the middle ground?

No GM is going make great deals every time. Unless you are playing with a stacked deck ala New York, Boston, and LA.

I agree with you...I'd like to see MacPhail move a little faster but I definitely don't want him to turn into Ken Williams. Let's try a medium pace.

Yes,

.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...