Jump to content

Wynn Pelzer


section36

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

BTW, IF the Padres end up netting a pick or 2 for Miggy..good for them.

But that doesn't change anything from the Orioles perspective here.

First of all, a lot of the reason that would happen is if he gets to the point where he was playing well and doesn't accept arbitration...and if that happens, who knows if it would have if he wasn't in the heat of a pennant race.

The orioles got a player that may be close to the equivalent of a comp pick anyway, so no biggie there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, this is a pretty bad trade if you ask me. Wynn Pelzer has some garbage minor league stats and he is another pitcher. We have plenty of those in the minors. For a starting thirdbasemen with Tejada's rep I would think you could have gotten more.

I rate this trade a D. And yeah, I know it opens the door for Bell but I would have hoped the Orioles would have gotten a better prospect than Pelzer.

You also thought the Escobar trade was bad for Toronto so............................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just amuses the hell out of me when folks who don't have a clue what they're talking about go on the offensive trying to show other folks up. Tell us again how awful this trade is, big guy. We're all listening with baited breath. I sincerely appreciate the amusement. Maybe next you'll adopt the JTrea tactic and tell us how "we already have too much pitching". lol

I've written it before, but I'll write it again. Thank God some of you don't run this team. This trade is a really good one. I applaud Andy for getting someone with this much upside for 2 months of a 3B with a 680 OPS. I'm amazed the Pads did it to be honest.

Once again you choose to embarrass yourself with your inflated unwarranted sense of self worth. No clue, eh? No clue about what pray tell? You've been applauding/defending this this franchise's management blindly all the way to the worst record in baseball. Only a true genius like yourself could justify such a long and consistent record of futility.

Just keep it up with the personal attacks. We all know how that's a significant part of your modus operandi here when you can't seriously contribute to a thread. Always remember, however, some people are better at it than you. ;)

L'audace, l'audace,toujours l'audace!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't pick on you until you decided to screw with AO who is both a more knowledgable poster than you AND a guy who never gives anyone crap. I wish I could just ignore stuff like you're posts, but I can't when they do this sort of stuff. AO rises above it. Good for him.

Anyway, you're the man. Tell us again how bad the trade is. Your analysis was riveting.

Hey you were the one raving about Pelzer's "upside". I've already posted his stats for this year that have you so enthralled.

Can I at least guess and say it was his WHIP that jumped out at you and made you such a big fan of his and MacPhails in this transaction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey you were the one raving about Pelzer's "upside". I've already posted his stats for this year that have you so enthralled.

Can I at least guess and say it was his WHIP that jumped out at you and made you such a big fan of his and MacPhails in this transaction?

I think maybe the point is that just copying stats off the internet doesn't mean anything. You need to understand what's significant about them. You also need to know what the stats don't tell you. Anybody who is making a big deal about a subset of his 1-year stats doesn't understand what to do with the numbers. It's not as simple as some folks seem to think it is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question was limited to the O's system. McCrory, based on physicality and stuff, was the closest I could think of off the top of my head. If you have a better comp, I'm happy to listen and agree.

Ok, I see your reasoning then...but what does that say about the state of our farm system on the pitching side? I feel like the starting pitching prospects we tend to develop are potential Brian Burres or Mark Hendrickson types rather than guys we can immediately add as power arms to the bullpen. We need more David Hernandez types in the organization and I'm not sure I see many...Brandon Erbe maybe, or somebody else I'm forgetting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, his 2010 WHIP is the basically the whole story. Way to cover the bases. The 8 K/9. The great GB/FB ratio. The rating as having the best fastball and slider in the Padres org. The rating as being their #5 prospect before this season and #17 prospect before last season. The results from the previous season. Those things just scream "organizational filler" as you wrote in the other thread. Thanks again for educating me with that 2010 WHIP stat. AM doesn't know what he is doing in this trade, but you've got thing nailed. Preach on brother...

Oh, and I then presume that I could also hazard a guess that you would be willing to bet your impeccable (I really wanted to use another word, but...) reputation by saying that Pelzer would have a solid MLB (middle reliever) career based on your self proclaimed expert analysis of his "upside".

Would you put him on par with a Scot Shields or a Fernando Rodney type? With "upside" wouldn't those guys be his comparables?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think maybe the point is that just copying stats off the internet doesn't mean anything. You need to understand what's significant about them. You also need to know what the stats don't tell you. Anybody who is making a big deal about a subset of his 1-year stats doesn't understand what to do with the numbers. It's not as simple as some folks seem to think it is...

Here they all are....

2005-Present:Year	Team	League	W	L	ERA	G	GS	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	GO/AO	AVG2008	FW	MID	9	6	3.19	29	23	0	0	0	118.1	114	64	42	9	32	100	1.76	.2482008	LE	CAL	0	0	27.00	1	0	0	0	0	1.0	3	4	3	0	1	0	2.00	.5002008	Minors	 	9	6	3.39	30	23	0	0	0	119.1	117	68	45	9	33	100	1.76	.2512009	LE	CAL	11	8	3.94	27	27	0	0	0	150.2	134	76	66	6	59	147	2.00	.2442009	Minors	 	11	8	3.94	27	27	0	0	0	150.2	134	76	66	6	59	147	2.00	.2442010	SA	TEX	6	9	4.20	22	18	0	0	0	94.1	102	57	44	9	56	83	1.25	.2772010	Minors	 	6	9	4.20	22	18	0	0	0	94.1	102	57	44	9	56	83	1.25	.277

I hope you're not suggesting we're somehow not seeing the "intangibles" thing? Like the ones Jordan was touting with Hobgood last year? I hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and I then presume that I could also hazard a guess that you would be willing to bet your impeccable (I really wanted to use another word, but...) reputation by saying that Pelzer would have a solid MLB (middle reliever) career based on your self proclaimed expert analysis of his "upside".

Would you put him on par with a Scot Shields or a Fernando Rodney type? With "upside" wouldn't those guys be his comparables?

The reality is we don't know what the guy's upside is as a reliever. He has a very good slider and a very good fastball from reports on him. He has just recently been put in a reliever role. We don't know how he will handle it. I like the idea of a guy with two plus pitches and he was slated by BA to be the Pads closer by year 2013. There is some potential in his arm and to get that type of upside for Tejada is good.

It is not an Earth shattering move, but at least there was a purpose behind it. Get a player with high upside for a guy who has no use on the club next year and open up a spot for a prospect to evaluate him for the rest of the season.

I am not sure why you have to be so against this move. So you don't like the guy's potential. So what? We still opened up a spot for Bell for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have and I’ve seen highlights. I don’t watch a lot of non AL East baseball. Outside of having a prop bet on Skubal to win the CYA. Just wondering what people thought. Not just trying to get a response to criticize.  Plus, do we really know that Fedde is even cheaper than Skubal?  Their GM has demanded a lot before. @Moose Milligan do you think Skubal is that much better than Fedde for just the rest of this season?  So that way we take out the extra year of club control.  
    • Look at their respective Statcasts and tell me what you see. 
    • I’m sure this has some hint of sarcasm to it. Because the answer to this question seems rather obvious. 1) Look at the age of the two pitchers. (27 v 31) 2) Fedde has NEVER been good before this year.  3) Look at Skubal’s Ks, Ks per nine, ERA not just this season but last year. It’s absolutely elite. 4) Fedde is a pitch to contact kind of guy, even in this his lone good season. Does that strategy really work/could it dominate in the postseason when you are facing the elite of the elite? Maybe against a team like SEA? But against NY, HOU, PHIL, LAD? Probably not. 5) We need a pitcher who is good enough to be successful over the course of multiple rounds, not just the opening round/one particular matchup. 6) Look at the difference in stuff. 7) Skubal is left handed. That has an advantage when pitching in parks like Camden Yards and Yankee Stadium.
    • Sell me on why Tarik Skubal is so much better than Erick Fedde.   
    • 28 pitches wasn’t good. I had forgotten it was that many.  We rode Bautista hard last year. It would make a lot of sense to bring Kimbrel back next year and have Bautista have some strict limitations in the regular season. 
    • IMO - The Rangers and Diamondbacks were “lucky” underdogs who overcame the odds last season. When you amass this much talent and undertake the steps it took to get here (extreme tanking which is now not allowed in baseball), the goal shouldn’t be to overcome the odds as an underdog in one October. IMO the goal should be a lot higher than that. Another Skubal type pitcher keeps the odds in our favor regardless of opponent. The Yankees will make a move. And right now (when healthy) the Phillies are better/more talented. To be honest I struggle to find an opponent where we will go into a series with the better pitching matchups (beyond Burnes).  Again, when you have the type of Major League talent and Minor League assets that we posses, the goal shouldn’t be to overcome the odds as an underdog. We should be trying to do what we can to tilt the odds in our favor. This may be our only season with Burnes, this this may be our best team. It’s not a sustainable strategy to acquire one year rentals (even as good as Burnes) most seasons. IMO you can’t continue to thrive doing 6 (years) for a (year) swaps.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...