Jump to content

Third base in 2011, if Bell can't cut it.


Scrat1

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So you wouldn't have wanted to trade for Jason Heyward before the 2010 season?

Moustakas isn't that much of a lock. You said it himself, he's scuffling in AAA.

If we can trade for a Heyward then by all means, go for it. But it has to be somebody that will be ready to jump in like a Heyward or a Longoria.

But not all hyped prospects will be able to do that. Just look at Matt Wieters, Jay Bruce, Adam Jones, etc.

There is a learning curve, and if we want to win games in the AL East, we don't want to have an all sub 25 year old team full of 1-3 year players.

We can't afford to have any more "learning on the job" positions if we want to get to the playoffs sooner than later. We've already got Jones and Wieters. That's enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moustakas isn't that much of a lock. You said it himself, he's scuffling in AAA.

If we can trade for a Heyward then by all means, go for it. But it has to be somebody that will be ready to jump in like a Heyward or a Longoria.

But not all hyped prospects will be able to do that. Just look at Matt Wieters, Jay Bruce, Adam Jones, etc.

There is a learning curve, and if we want to win games in the AL East, we don't want to have an all sub 25 year old team full of 1-3 year players.

We can't afford to have any more "learning on the job" positions if we want to get to the playoffs sooner than later. We've already got Jones and Wieters. That's enough.

We're operating in the hypothetical since there's no way we're trading for Moustakas but, if you wouldn't trade for him because he's just not already a performing at way above average ML than I think you're ability to judge the long term plans of this franchise is severly limited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Bell deserves more than a month and a half. After our great run under Buck, we still have the worst record in baseball. If I thought we could win the World Series next year, I might be more hasty, but with this team we need to give prospects a chance to develop.

Cal hit .128 when he was called up. Markakis couldn't hit a lick when he came up. Brady couldn't hit for a few years. Be patient with the young players. We need to build for the future.

For many years, it seemed that we would acquire just enough older talent to finish in 4th place. Meanwhile, Tampa Bay would finish last and collect high draft picks. I would rather lose a few more games with young players and eventually return to the promised land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moustakas isn't that much of a lock. You said it himself, he's scuffling in AAA.

If we can trade for a Heyward then by all means, go for it. But it has to be somebody that will be ready to jump in like a Heyward or a Longoria.

But not all hyped prospects will be able to do that. Just look at Matt Wieters, Jay Bruce, Adam Jones, etc.

There is a learning curve, and if we want to win games in the AL East, we don't want to have an all sub 25 year old team full of 1-3 year players.

We can't afford to have any more "learning on the job" positions if we want to get to the playoffs sooner than later. We've already got Jones and Wieters. That's enough.

No one is a lock. Alex Gordon was once a "lock" just like Wieters. Same with Matt LaPorta. It's impossible to tell who is going to be good before they are. If people knew, they would never trade them away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moustakas isn't that much of a lock. You said it himself, he's scuffling in AAA.

If we can trade for a Heyward then by all means, go for it. But it has to be somebody that will be ready to jump in like a Heyward or a Longoria.

But not all hyped prospects will be able to do that. Just look at Matt Wieters, Jay Bruce, Adam Jones, etc.

There is a learning curve, and if we want to win games in the AL East, we don't want to have an all sub 25 year old team full of 1-3 year players.

We can't afford to have any more "learning on the job" positions if we want to get to the playoffs sooner than later. We've already got Jones and Wieters. That's enough.

Since when was Adam Jones a can't miss prospect? He was thought to be good with a ceiling of T. Hunter. But not in the same class as Wieters and Bruce.

It's hard to find guys who are established guys like Prince Fielder or Mark Teixeira, especially at the hot corner. Plus in a deal like this you might not have to give up quite as much as you would for one of those players.

We're operating in the hypothetical since there's no way we're trading for Moustakas but, if you wouldn't trade for him because he's just not already a performing at way above average ML than I think you're ability to judge the long term plans of this franchise is severly limited.

I wouldn't be against trading: Tillman/Arrieta, Berry, Bell and Pie/Jones (I'd want Butler or Ka'aihue if we're giving up that much though).

They need pitching, not necessarily another ace, and get two solid guys in Tillman/Arrieta and Berry, they get Bell who should eventually be a solid 3Bman, and they need CF help which Pie/Jones gives them. I could see a deal like that working out. We get better quality back, but they get more quantity back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Bell deserves more than a month and a half. After our great run under Buck, we still have the worst record in baseball. If I thought we could win the World Series next year, I might be more hasty, but with this team we need to give prospects a chance to develop.

Cal hit .128 when he was called up. Markakis couldn't hit a lick when he came up. Brady couldn't hit for a few years. Be patient with the young players. We need to build for the future.

I don't think we are looking only at numbers. A manager can tell things about a player's hitting talents even if his numbers are poor. Same with defense.

I was living on the West Coast in the early months of Cal's rookie year, so I can't comment on how he looked as he was struggling initially. In Nick's case, the guy looked like a major leaguer from his very first game. The plate discipline was there, the defense was more or less there, and his general approach to the game was there.

I will tell you, I have some reservations about Bell, numbers aside. At 3B, to me he isn't quick to react. His body is very heavy-legged and I really doubt he's going to have a lot of range. Offensively, his stance is very open and he seems very susceptible to pitches away. It's just my gut feeling -- and I will defer to Showalter and people who know a lot more than I do -- that he's going to be below average defensively and not a good enough hitter to make him average or better overall. Just my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are looking only at numbers. A manager can tell things about a player's hitting talents even if his numbers are poor. Same with defense.

I was living on the West Coast in the early months of Cal's rookie year, so I can't comment on how he looked as he was struggling initially. In Nick's case, the guy looked like a major leaguer from his very first game. The plate discipline was there, the defense was more or less there, and his general approach to the game was there.

I will tell you, I have some reservations about Bell, numbers aside. At 3B, to me he isn't quick to react. His body is very heavy-legged and I really doubt he's going to have a lot of range. Offensively, his stance is very open and he seems very susceptible to pitches away. It's just my gut feeling -- and I will defer to Showalter and people who know a lot more than I do -- that he's going to be below average defensively and not a good enough hitter to make him average or better overall. Just my guess.

A lot of scouts thought he would be average defensively, but would be able to stick at third, especially after losing some weight this past offseason. Maybe playing poorly will drive him to work his A$$ off this next offseason to trim down a little and get stronger, work on his defense, as well as his plate discipline, and his swing. He has it inside him, he just needs to figure out how to let it loose, he seems to be pressing a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of scouts thought he would be average defensively, but would be able to stick at third, especially after losing some weight this past offseason. Maybe playing poorly will drive him to work his A$$ off this next offseason to trim down a little and get stronger, work on his defense, as well as his plate discipline, and his swing. He has it inside him, he just needs to figure out how to let it loose, he seems to be pressing a lot.

Mind you, I want him playing pretty much every day the rest of the season, so there's more evidence to go on. But I can easily imagine scenarios where we aren't willing to go into 2011 with Bell as our primary option at 3B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this would be tough, but I think we should try to get ARam and trade for someone like Mike Moustakas, especially if we think Bell's not gonna cut it.

Moustakas has kind of scuffled this year in Triple-A, so maybe we could send them Tillman, Zagone, Berry, and Berken for Moustakas and Ka'aihue.

I am not giving up on Tillman by any means, but that trade still comes awfully close to piling on leftovers and spare parts in the hopes of snagging a quality player. In the real world, trades like that almost never happen.

Even with his scuffling start at AAA, Moustakas is still one of the top prospects in baseball. It will take a real quality return to make KC let go of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beltre is going to be seeking an over-inflated contract based on his production this season. We'll pay .900 OPS money and get .750 OPS stats.

I'd like to see Bell play nearly every day until the season ends. 48 at bats for a 23 year old rookie is meaningless. If he hit .370 with five HRs in 48 at bats we'd all be cheering and the stats would be equally meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind you, I want him playing pretty much every day the rest of the season, so there's more evidence to go on. But I can easily imagine scenarios where we aren't willing to go into 2011 with Bell as our primary option at 3B.

In no way do I want Bell handed the starting 3B spot next year unless he shows he's real special during this last month and a half or so. He should be given a fair shot at third base next year, but we should have someone like ARam ready to play there if he cannot hold it down.

I am not giving up on Tillman by any means, but that trade still comes awfully close to piling on leftovers and spare parts in the hopes of snagging a quality player. In the real world, trades like that almost never happen.

Even with his scuffling start at AAA, Moustakas is still one of the top prospects in baseball. It will take a real quality return to make KC let go of him.

Oh I know, I kind of realized it after I posted that, a little hometown bias on my part.

Anyways I revised my original idea, let's say that Jones and Pie stay healthy the rest of the year and both show MacPhail and Showalter that they can play. I think we could put one of them in this deal (as the centerpiece), along with Berry, Tillman/Arrieta, and probably someone else like Avery or Joseph.

It all would depend on how highly our FO holds Moustakas, and how highly they hold Pie/Jones and Tillman/Arrieta. We could give them Bell as well since they would need a 3Bman.

From the KC standpoint it's not a bad trade, I think Berry should turn out to be a solid 3/4 guy (and they NEED pitching), Tillman/Arrieta could also be a middle of the rotation guy, with a ceiling as a #2. Pie/Jones will probably be an above average starting CF for a long time, and that is something KC lacks in their system or on their current roster. No matter what happens with Bell this year, I still think he has a good shot to be an average-above average 3Bman, and when you take in everything else that KC gets in the trade they would come out pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I will tell you, I have some reservations about Bell, numbers aside. At 3B, to me he isn't quick to react. His body is very heavy-legged and I really doubt he's going to have a lot of range. Offensively, his stance is very open and he seems very susceptible to pitches away. It's just my gut feeling -- and I will defer to Showalter and people who know a lot more than I do -- that he's going to be below average defensively and not a good enough hitter to make him average or better overall. Just my guess.

I was at the game tonight, and Bell allowed a ball to go down the line that wasn't hit very hard at all, and he barely got his feet moving before it was past him. 80% chance that Mora or Tejada make that play, IMO. I feel he has a very slow first step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm not saying the bolded is impossible. But what are the odds of that happening for the rest of this season, even if he were to be called up tomorrow? I'm not sure how much value Moutcastle would have (even if he continues to have a very good season) to a team who is rebuilding/reseting/tanking/whatever you want to call it. Mountcastle would seem to have more value to a team who is trying to win and needs offensive production at 1B/DH. And if they are already trying to win, what pitching are they willing to depart with. The only team I can think of that may fit this mold is SEA. IMO that's way too much to give up for a relief pitcher, considering that we only need a good middle reliever. We don't need Emmanuel Clase for the rest of this season. It looks like Kimbrel will do. And then next year Felix will be coming back.
    • I think Elias' MO is always going to be to squeeze the max potential value out of every asset. If Kjerstad isn't playing well enough to wrest away more than 10 ABs/week from the other players on the roster, then I don't think he stays up. Especially when he'd be tying up a bench spot with a player who can really only play one position in the field. He's going to have to earn a bigger time share to justify his spot. 
    • Well, he either shows something or he doesn't. I don't think he's going anywhere until he shows something. 
    • Means starting tonight for Norfolk. Hopefully he puts some length in his start tonight. Probably his next to last minor league start if they do bring him back up. 
    • I'm not saying that id not possible, but it is certainly not probable. Given the talent gap between Carter and Norby. Again, IMO the greater odds/gain is that Norby is a useful piece in a trade than him becoming the next Evan Carter.
    • That sequence showed why Mateo is on the team. There are much worse things than having him in the 9 spot here and there versus LHP. And when he’s not, he can pinch run and do the exact same thing. It’s why when push comes to shove, and it will soon, it’s Urias’ head on the chopping block and not Jorge’s.    We all know this, but it’s nice to see it demonstrated on the field here and there as a reminder.  
    • We could really use Cease too. The WS had a lineup the other day and I believe everyone or at least 8 guys had a sub 200 BA.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...