Jump to content

Grade the O's draft now that signings are done


Now that signings are done, how do you grade this draft?  

139 members have voted

  1. 1. Now that signings are done, how do you grade this draft?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
My inclination was that this is a C- draft, based on upside outside outside of Machado/Klein. Granted, if one of those two hits close to their ceiling, it could turn into something much better.

Really? So you don't like Narron, Esquivel, Sawyer, Schrader, Bywater, Bridwell, Wise, or Vader?

So are you saying the rest of the draft is a a C- other than Machado and Klein or are you grading this last draft overall as a C-?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unbelievable some on here are saying that a draft is a C- if you exclude the two highest picks we had. Any draft that produces two regular everyday players is atleast a B. I would think it is very likely that this draft exceeds two ML regulars. What is the criteria that you are grading on? Based on your upside comment I guess you don't like the upside of the picks. How many teams drafted a guy that has allstar SS has a very reasonable ceiling. Klien

has a ceiling of a number two and the thing that really helps this pick is his floor is probably a good setup guy. Throw in all of the overslot high ceiling guy. I just don't get what your saying. The truth about almost all draft is the grade you can give any year is based largely on how a few high picks pan out. So I find your premise completely flawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? So you don't like Narron, Esquivel, Sawyer, Schrader, Bywater, Bridwell, Wise, or Vader?

So are you saying the rest of the draft is a a C- other than Machado and Klein or are you grading this last draft overall as a C-?

Yeah, those guys sound like they have decent potential, but generally not a great chance of hitting their upside.

My best guess is that any draft can turn into a great draft if all of the guys with any upside get developed and generally meet their potential. But any team can say that, and I'd wager that most teams pretty much have a bunch of guys just like ours who they think can all become the next good/great major leaguer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unbelievable some on here are saying that a draft is a C- if you exclude the two highest picks we had. Any draft that produces two regular everyday players is atleast a B. I would think it is very likely that this draft exceeds two ML regulars. What is the criteria that you are grading on? Based on your upside comment I guess you don't like the upside of the picks. How many teams drafted a guy that has allstar SS has a very reasonable ceiling. Klien

has a ceiling of a number two and the thing that really helps this pick is his floor is probably a good setup guy. Throw in all of the overslot high ceiling guy. I just don't get what your saying. The truth about almost all draft is the grade you can give any year is based largely on how a few high picks pan out. So I find your premise completely flawed.

Machado's upside is VERY high, for sure. There are also some rumblings that he won't stick at SS, and he's very young, so while his ceiling is high, his floor is still undefined.

Klein's hype on this site is a joke, IMO. I like the pick, but he'd have to basically have everything go perfectly for him to be a solid #2. He was a reliever in college for goodness sakes. I'll be rooting for the guy, and I'm certainly not ruling out that he can be a solid starter or power bullpen guy for us in the future, but I'm probably putting the probability of the former somewhat lower than you are.

I REALLY wish we had some supplemental picks and a 2nd rounder. Most of my frustration has to do with our lack of quantity at the top of the draft. The success or failure of this draft rests too heavily on a high school SS and a college reliever. So, yeah, C-.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First I don't think it is fair to be critical of JJ about picks he did not have. Secondly Klien was in the pen because of injury. That is something that is missed around here by alot of posters.

Why wouldn't the injury history be a knock against him sticking long term in a rotation? I like Klein a lot. It will be a tough road for him to be molded into a solid ML starter, let alone a #2. I mean, the best arms in the draft this year were potential #2s and it was like two or three guys. Most of the best college starters from 2010 are much more likely to top out as #3s -- it's a bit much to start calling Klein a potential #2 at this point. Let's see how he responds to going five innings every five days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't the injury history be a knock against him sticking long term in a rotation? I like Klein a lot. It will be a tough road for him to be molded into a solid ML starter, let alone a #2. I mean, the best arms in the draft this year were potential #2s and it was like two or three guys. Most of the best college starters from 2010 are much more likely to top out as #3s -- it's a bit much to start calling Klein a potential #2 at this point. Let's see how he responds to going five innings every five days.

Harvey has a #1 ceiling IMO..........Not saying I expect him to become a #1, but he does have the potential I'd say.....

Kinda off subject though......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harvey has a #1 ceiling IMO..........Not saying I expect him to become a #1, but he does have the potential I'd say.....

Kinda off subject though......

I guess it depends on how willing you are to project potential improvement with regards to command and consistency. I mean, the more liberal you are with your ratings (glass is half-full) the higher ceilings you're going to hand out. Sort of like saying Britton has #1 ceiling if his slider continues to improve and if his change-up becomes a legit plus pitch with consistency and if he cuts down on walks and if and if and if and so on.

My guess is you'd give Klein a #2 ceiling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it depends on how willing you are to project potential improvement with regards to command and consistency. I mean, the more liberal you are with your ratings (glass is half-full) the higher ceilings you're going to hand out. Sort of like saying Britton has #1 ceiling if his slider continues to improve and if his change-up becomes a legit plus pitch with consistency and if he cuts down on walks and if and if and if and so on.

My guess is you'd give Klein a #2 ceiling?

I was actually thinking Klein a #3 ceiling and Britton a #2 ceiling......I don't expect the changup to become plus, I'd say it'll be an average pitch...

And Klein's velocity isn't going to be touching 95 when he is a starter IMO, he only would throw that hard when in shorter stints. As a starter he will probably be 90-93, which is significant....Thats why I'd say a #3 ceiling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was actually thinking Klein a #3 ceiling and Britton a #2 ceiling......I don't expect the changup to become plus, I'd say it'll be an average pitch...

And Klein's velocity isn't going to be touching 95 when he is a starter IMO, he only would throw that hard when in shorter stints. As a starter he will probably be 90-93, which is significant....Thats why I'd say a #3 ceiling...

I don't think there's any way to know what velocity he'll have as a starter, to say nothing of the fact that it's likely to vacillate throughout the season. I can buy a #3 ceiling, but from me it would come with a very low probability tag. It's very difficult to do what Klein is doing without an injury history -- he'll need to build-up arm strength and stamina all while continuing to improve his pitches and his approach against more advanced hitters.

I'm not saying he won't do it, but it will be difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have alot of concern that the injury was not TJS. It seems there have been improvement in the area of shoulder surgery. However it would be completely expected for a minor league guy to be handled the same one year removed from shoulder repair. As to the comments about his ceiling we really are not far apart in our view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First I don't think it is fair to be critical of JJ about picks he did not have. Secondly Klien was in the pen because of injury. That is something that is missed around here by alot of posters.

I'm grading the O's draft relative to other teams, not Jordan's draft relative to his opportunity. I'd give that anywhere from a B to a C, with the difference being almost entirely dependent on what Klein projects as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yes. That’s less than 25 million a season on average. Even though the years are a bit long. That’s the going rate for these type of superstar players.  Maybe you can go more AAV in exchange for say a 12 year deal? But at age 22, even at 14 years he’s here until he’s what 37/38? In 10 years 25 mill per won’t be the valued at nearly the same dollar amount in terms of “paying an older possibly declining player”. That contract length also ensures that he is an Oriole for life basically. If Rubenstien’s goal is to restore the franchise’s glory instead of simply making it a competitive franchise. You cannot minimize the value of having these type of franchise cornerstone players/homegrown superstars. We basically haven’t had one (and retained) since Ripken. (Yes I know Machado was one but we let him walk and basically the same with Mussina.)
    • I was looking at the O’s stat page and noticing how high all the OPS+ numbers are.  For example, Cedric Mullins has a .736 OPS but that’s good for a 116 OPS+ right now.  So, I looked around.  Right now, the MLB average OPS is .698.  That’s down from .734 last year, and (for those thinking of a “cold weather” explanation) from .726 last April.    The O’s, on the other hand, have a .780 OPS, compared to .742 last year.  That’s 3rd in MLB and good for an MLB-leading 130 OPS+, compared to 107 last year.    I’m not sure if the hot hitting will continue, but the team has had one heck of a start offensively, in a year where the league has been pretty cold.    
    • I didn’t see Angel Hernandez listed in any of the box scores from yesterday so he may have been the replay official. That would actually be hilarious. 
    • @Tony-OH   It’s early but is Forret possibly a better prospect than DeLeon?  A year younger.  Sounds like velo is similar.  Better control?
    • I wouldn’t hesitate to give him the Witt deal. I would like to get 3 FA years.  That’s my best case scenario and after that, the opt outs start.
    • At this point Gunnar is the most valuable asset in baseball right? I guess you could argue Witt Jr or De La Cruz. I sure as heck wouldn’t trade him for anybody.
    • @Tony-OHhave you had a chance to see or hear anything about Cam Weston yet? Is there real upside or is this an older guy who's maybe more advanced than his league?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...