Jump to content

BA Carolina League top 20 Prospects:Avery #12


jcarm

Recommended Posts

Considering that there are only 8 teams in the Carolina League, having one player in the Top 20 isn't a good showing at all. Myrtle Beach has 3, Wilmington has 5, Salem has 3, Kinston has 2, Potomac has 3. For us to have only one is pathetic.

That said, I'm a bit surprised that Hoes and Berry aren't on the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's somewhat surprising that Hoes didn't make it, but he did miss some time this season. Hopefully next year he'll recognition in the Eastern League.

This is important to remember when looking at these top 20 league lists. They take performance into consideration more so than BA's end of year overall lists, and with Hoes missing part of the year (and the month-long-slump attributed to mono) he was facing an up-hill climb to make this list.

And I don't know if this is really another reason or not, but I've always thought/said that Hoes has to put up big numbers to make these lists because his tools aren't as loud. Prolonged success would probably do the trick, too, but he's not there yet either. That doesn't mean I'm a Hoes-Hater. I still like his chances of contributing in the big leagues. This is my opinion of national/league-wide coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if some of the lack of guys on lists have to do with; 1. Stockstill being much more agressive with guys. In the past hoes might have spent atleast half of the season with the Shorebirds and likely would have been much more impressive. 2. The general view that the O's do not develop hitters well at all amongst baseball people.

Honestly it does not matter if Hoes is on the list or not reports of Hoes being legit is more encouraging than guys being on various list when scouts are point out that there are major flaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love BA top 20's and I sympathesize with trying to get 40 good prospects on a 20 person list but that list is one of the worst I have ever seen at BA minus the well deserved praise for all the Royals prospects and Tejada. It is full of 23 year olds and league repeaters. Hoes and Berry were younger and better than most of the guys on that list. Hoes is much better than Oscar Tejada who they project as a super utility guy. Hoover of the Braves has slightly worse figures at 23 years old then Berry at 21 years old. Horrible list. One of the worst I have seen at BA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my question and the subsequent answer from the chat about the Carolina League list:

John (Acworth,GA): How close did LJ Hoes and Ryan Berry of Frederick come to making the list? I have been hearing very good reports on Hoes from another web site. Also did big Joe Mahoney or Ronnie Welty merit any mentions? Thanks!

Lacy Lusk: More mentions on Hoes and Welty than the other guys. Hoes took a step forward this year, and Welty has good power and is a plus defender in right field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an answer to another question, the BA guy says that Welty received the most support for the list(other than Avery) than the other Keys. I guess they liked Welty better than Hoes.I like Welty, but I was under the impression that Hoes is a much better prospect. Doesn't Welty strike out too much to be considered a serious prospect right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an answer to another question, the BA guy says that Welty received the most support for the list(other than Avery) than the other Keys. I guess they liked Welty better than Hoes.I like Welty, but I was under the impression that Hoes is a much better prospect. Doesn't Welty strike out too much to be considered a serious prospect right now?

Some evaluators would disagree with me, but I think Hoes is a safer bet than Welty, with Welty having a bit more upside (though his margin for error is pretty slim given his potential contact issues at the upper-levels). Welty's arm arm and power scream out at you, which is easier for an evaluator to get excited about than a solid average kid across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some evaluators would disagree with me, but I think Hoes is a safer bet than Welty, with Welty having a bit more upside (though his margin for error is pretty slim given his potential contact issues at the upper-levels). Welty's arm arm and power scream out at you, which is easier for an evaluator to get excited about than a solid average kid across the board.

That's what I was thinking. I think Hoes will be the kind of hitter that you need to watch on a regular basis to appreciate, and even in a small league, the other Carolina League managers might not have seen him enough. And let's be honest, Hoes's end of year numbers don't scream top prospect, which hurt his chances for this list, especially when coupled with solid average, not loud, tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love BA top 20's and I sympathesize with trying to get 40 good prospects on a 20 person list but that list is one of the worst I have ever seen at BA minus the well deserved praise for all the Royals prospects and Tejada. It is full of 23 year olds and league repeaters. Hoes and Berry were younger and better than most of the guys on that list. Hoes is much better than Oscar Tejada who they project as a super utility guy. Hoover of the Braves has slightly worse figures at 23 years old then Berry at 21 years old. Horrible list. One of the worst I have seen at BA.

Actually Hoover & Berry are only 1 year apart.

Hoover DOB = 08/13/1987

Berry DOB = 08/03/1988

IMO, Hoover versus Berry is defensible, too. Hoover started in all of his appearances and has a more durable build. That could point to his remaining as a starter - advantage Hoover. That being said, I've read that some scouts think Hoover could end up as a reliever, so maybe it's even.

But I understand what you're saying and partly agree. I wonder if this will become more common as BA goes through their Top 20 League lists. They do take performance into consideration more than their overall lists so it's not uncommon to have Player 'A' rank above Player 'B' and then have them switched up in the overall composite rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some evaluators would disagree with me, but I think Hoes is a safer bet than Welty, with Welty having a bit more upside (though his margin for error is pretty slim given his potential contact issues at the upper-levels). Welty's arm arm and power scream out at you, which is easier for an evaluator to get excited about than a solid average kid across the board.

Yes, I guess its the polish that has always had me excited. Way back in the GCL, when he posted those ridiculous OBP numbers, I really just fell in love with that skill of his.

I know 1 thing, and maybe I am in the minority here, but I take Hoes over Avery......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Baseball’s a funny game.  We spend 1.4M on Carter Young who played at D1 powerhouse Vanderbilt and he hasn’t looked too good so far in his pro career.  A year later in the 20th round, we pick Vazquez from North Greenville University (sorry. Never heard of it), sign him for 30k and he puts up an .822 OPS at Delmarva.  This year both Vazquez and Young are at Aberdeen and it’s not too difficult to guess which one is the better prospect. In 46 PA, Vazquez has 12 walks to 7 strikeouts and a .933 OPS.  In addition, he’s stolen 7 bases in 8 tries.   @Tony-OH also has said he’s a good defensive SS. 2023 draft.  Etzel in the 10th.  Vazquez in the 20th.  Nice job, scouts.
    • They may be a way to start him out. But I hope that is not the plan long term. If you had a chance to listen to Hyde's comments they appear to be trying to build Bradish back up into a regular starter. He talked about him building toward 80 pitches in his next rehab outing. In order for this team to get where it wants to go, we will need the Bradish of last year (or a comparable pitcher to that).
    • Hopefully Means gets a rehab extension for another 30 days. If not, this seems right to me. Does Bradish go to the pen, or does he start with one of Suarez, Kremer, or Irvin pushed to the pen? I kind of like Bradish as an opener with Irvin backing him up most of his starts.
    • He threw that fastball right down the shoot on a 1-2 count. That was not a case of Trout being Trout. It was a case of horrible location. I have to believe that it was not his intention to throw it there after he watched us beat Trout several times the night before with hard stuff up in the zone (Trout's only weakness). Maybe the extra day messed up something with Rodriguez's ability to execute? Maybe he just had a bad night? But this was not the case of the Angels being good. It was Grayson who was really bad.
    • But, but they lost. They absorbed a loss. 
    • That’s probably true and Elias said he also didn’t want to call him up if he wasn’t ready to be an everyday player.   So ………. something to keep an eye on.
    • Yea he has looked bad but while it’s fair to point that out, it’s also fair to point that some of this could be attributed to rust, an injury, not having a real ST, not playing in the field as much (I assume since he’s not catching?), etc…I think his timing is likely off and he’s working himself back into things. He has played 15 games. He has a multi hit game in 1/3 of his game so far. You point out all the Ks…what’s funny is all the Ks came in 5 games and he hasn’t struck out the last 4. To me the only thing that bothers me as of right now is the zero walks but it’s not something that would concern me long term.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...