Jump to content

Rank the 1B prospects


Frobby

How do you rank our 1B prospects?  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you rank our 1B prospects?

    • Mahoney, Snyder, Townsend
    • Mahoney, Townsend, Snyder
    • Townsend, Mahoney, Snyder
    • Townsend, Snyder, Mahoney
    • Snyder, Townsend, Mahoney
    • Snyder, Mahoney, Townsend


Recommended Posts

I voted Snyder, Townsend, Mahoney. I have to admit, I don't feel I have a real good handle on Townsend because he has played so little. He might deserve to be ranked 1st, or 3rd.

Snyder vs. Mahoney is a fairly close call. I continue to put a lot of stock in the fact that he's only 2-3 months older than Mahoney, and yet he has played 1.5 seasons in AAA and had a cup of coffee in the majors, whereas Mahoney has only a half-season of AA under his belt. Snyder's half-season of AA at age 22 was better than Mahoney's at age 23, and his season of A+ at age 21 was better than Mahoney's at 23. And to me, even though Snyder has struggled quite a bit at AAA, I haven't forgotten how he excelled twice in the AFL and once in the HWL. I just think he's better than his AAA numbers have shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted Snyder, Townsend, Mahoney. I have to admit, I don't feel I have a real good handle on Townsend because he has played so little. He might deserve to be ranked 1st, or 3rd.

Snyder vs. Mahoney is a fairly close call. I continue to put a lot of stock in the fact that he's only 2-3 months older than Mahoney, and yet he has played 1.5 seasons in AAA and had a cup of coffee in the majors, whereas Mahoney has only a half-season of AA under his belt. Snyder's half-season of AA at age 22 was better than Mahoney's at age 23, and his season of A+ at age 21 was better than Mahoney's at 23. And to me, even though Snyder has struggled quite a bit at AAA, I haven't forgotten how he excelled twice in the AFL and once in the HWL. I just think he's better than his AAA numbers have shown.

So do I, but I think he'll have to figure out a way to show it at Norfolk, because I don't think he'll get a chance to show it in the majors otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do I, but I think he'll have to figure out a way to show it at Norfolk, because I don't think he'll get a chance to show it in the majors otherwise.

Well, I don't expect the O's to wait around for him. I think (and hope) that they will bring in a solid major league 1B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think you can make arguments for any order. None of them strike me as particularly exciting prospects, but all seem like they have a chance to become average contributors.

Snyder needs to do something next year or I think most will have given up on him.

Mahoney has been talked to death already, but I think the bottom line is he needs to perform well next year to establish himself. His 2010 was good, but certainly not a breakout. 23 isn't ancient for HiA/AA, but it's far from young and far from impressive. If he hits around .280/.340/.480 at Norfolk, he'll have made some noise.

Townsend was fine in limited action. I'd like to see him stay healthy. Otherwise, he's in the same boat as Mahoney 2010, though with a much better lead-in. I'd want to see a strong offensive performance over the entirety of 2011 at AA, which to me includes some of those doubles turning into homeruns.

All three look like they have skill sets that could translate into ML regulars, but I don't think any looks like a good bet everydayer or long shot big contributor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=1B&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=572213

I'd say a .325 AVG and a .959 OPS for a 22 year old, first full season out of college, is a tad bit better than fine. I'd say that was damn good. I think the numbers for Townsend are exciting. 21 doubles, 4 triples, and 6 homers and 45 RBI in 52 games. That's a heckuva pace!

Great. I'm glad you're excited and hope you enjoy following him and the rest of the O's prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 3rd base is a more pressing need for the Orioles right now. I actually think that Snyder as of now is more polished than Bell and should be given a chance to compete for the 1st base men's job out of ST. Snyder only got 20 ABs. I wish he was given the 1 mo chance that Bell got and didnt capitalize on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the real question to ask is this......Are any of these guys "real" prospects?

I would guess that we still don't have any kind of real long term solution at first.

Townsend's numbers look pretty good to me. Why is he recieving so little credit by so many people?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 3rd base is a more pressing need for the Orioles right now. I actually think that Snyder as of now is more polished than Bell and should be given a chance to compete for the 1st base men's job out of ST. Snyder only got 20 ABs. I wish he was given the 1 mo chance that Bell got and didnt capitalize on.

Compete with whom? If the O's sign a FA 1Bman this winter, there won't be any competition. I've been a Snyder fan, but even I don't think the O's should keep a spot open for him. The O's need credible upgrades at both corner spots.

It's easy to say in retrospect that Snyder should have gotten the ABs that went to Bell. But Snyder had his chance while he was at Norfolk. He wasn't blocked; the path was wide open when Atkins fizzled, but Snyder didn't take advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Townsend's numbers look pretty good to me. Why is he recieving so little credit by so many people?

Here are a couple of my favorite second and third tier talents going into the draft:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=oaks--001ala

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=bischo001mat

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=cerret001phi

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=guinn-002bri

All were on my high recommend draft list and check out the wide variance in rounds selected. I don't consider any of them to be big time prospects until they get a couple of productive seasons under their belt. The skillsets still have questions, but I love them for what they represent as potential contributors with development. I would consider the existence of players like this when relying on stat lines for appraisals (which we all have to do from time to time). Townsend went higher than all of these players, and is obviously older and finished at a higher level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are a couple of my favorite second and third tier talents going into the draft:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=oaks--001ala

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=bischo001mat

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=cerret001phi

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=guinn-002bri

All were on my high recommend draft list and check out the wide variance in rounds selected. I don't consider any of them to be big time prospects until they get a couple of productive seasons under their belt. The skillsets still have questions, but I love them for what they represent as potential contributors with development. I would consider the existence of players like this when relying on stat lines for appraisals (which we all have to do from time to time). Townsend went higher than all of these players, and is obviously older and finished at a higher level.

Cerreto undrafted?

That's a nice catch for the Cards. Two-time Appy League PoW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...