Jump to content

Will Orioles Deal With Mets?


section18

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If Jason Bay could be acquired on the cheap (prospects wise), I'd look into that.

Left Field was a disgrace this year, and I'm not sold on Nolan being able to put it back together. Bay is not suited for playing in Citi, but I think he'd do very well in Camden Yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to have either player! But like I've been saying for the past decade or so. The O's need to build a top flight(top flight of the world Craig) farm system. There are no two ways around it! The O's need to build the latter before they even think of the former. Because I am in agreement that it would take a 5-1 deal to get either one unless you have Markakis in the deal and I don't think the O's can afford to do either of those things yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Wright is dealt somewhere else, I agree with you -- and they would be right.
Why? It would depend on what it took to get him. The O's only have so much they can afford to part with. We aren't that deep. If Wright gets dealt it would be for a Bedard type package, and that wasn't such a smart dead was it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, which is why the Mets aren't about to deal him, unless completely overwhelmed, which the Orioles can't do. Wright isn't going anywhere. Let's be realistic. Reyes MIGHT be available. I would think that Bay IS available. I would think Beltran IS available. You may not want those guys but that's reality, not fantasy.

You would have to start with a deal that has Guthrie, Jones, and Wieters to get Wright and you'd have to take back a bad contract like Beltran's or Bay's.

I wonder how much cheaper the package gets if you take back Bay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it does. As you can see, I had that in mind when I posted. A trade for Wright would have to hurt, as it should.

I agree.

But you have to wonder, what happens if you take on Bay and his whole contract...If you take back Bay, along with Wright, you are taking on close to 100 million dollars...That has to account for something.

Offer up Guthrie or Tillman, Pie and any 3 or 4 prospects they want outside of Britton and Machado(who can't be dealt yet anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be serious. Can you imagine the new Mets GM explaining to the fans that he traded away Wright and Bay and got back Guthrie, Pie and prospects? Oriole fans would be delirious with joy. It's not realistic.

Pie with or without prospects for Bay makes some sense for both teams if the Mets are trying to shed payroll.

The Wright part of it makes no sense. Again, you'd have to deal two top of the line young players to get him. Not prospects.

I am not really disagreeing with you.

I do think you are really overlooking taking on all of that money and just how important that is here.

HOWEVER, the Mets would have to be desperate to shed payroll to make a move like that and I am not sure you can call them desperate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take Bay as part of a deal for either one of these players. Alderson being on the west coast should be very familiar with Jones, Tillman and Arrieta. Add Scott and a Wright deal is very possible with Bay included.

And you just made the Orioles a worse team while adding a ton of salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? It would depend on what it took to get him. The O's only have so much they can afford to part with. We aren't that deep. If Wright gets dealt it would be for a Bedard type package, and that wasn't such a smart dead was it?

This misses the point and creates an impossible criteria for trades. If you want to trade for impact players, it is going to cost something. We can discuss if Wright is worth targeting based on his production, but BAL should be willing to pay a reasonable price if they indeed interested.

I don't see any comparison to Bedard. Wright is owed a ton of money and would not demand the sheer number of prospects that Bedard demanded. Not to mention you can't make those types of correlations when you are talking about completely different principals involved in the negotiations.

My guess would be a three player deal with one a "throw-in" and two good to very good prospects/MLB players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...