Terps Miami

[Pedro Cerrano]

Is this not on TV or the internet today unless you have ESPNU??!!

PATHETIC!!!

[square634]

Is this not on TV or the internet today unless you have ESPN3??!!

PATHETIC!!!

False, it's on ESPNU and ESPNUHD. Channel 73/573 on Howard County FIOS. Also, horrendous drop by a Terps WR on 3rd and 7 of opening drive. That is inexcusable, and might turn the tide of the game.

[Pedro Cerrano]

False, it's on ESPNU and ESPNUHD. Channel 73/573 on Howard County FIOS. Also, horrendous drop by a Terps WR on 3rd and 7 of opening drive. That is inexcusable, and might turn the tide of the game.

Yea I meant ESPNU not ESPN3...dagger. Comcast doesn't provide that with their basic service.

[square634]

Yea I meant ESPNU not ESPN3...dagger. Comcast doesn't provide that with their basic service.

Having Comcast is certainly a dagger.

[square634]

Having Comcast is certainly a dagger.

As is porous defense. 6-0 Canes (bobbled snap on the extra point)

[square634]

Wow, great job by O'Brien and his receivers on this drive. Touchdown Terps, but under review.

[Pedro Cerrano]

Wow, great job by O'Brien and his receivers on this drive. Touchdown Terps, but under review.

And he's only a freshman:2yay-thumb:

[square634]

And he's only a freshman:2yay-thumb:

7-6 Terps. I'm still not convinced that Maryland is any good, but it would be really funny to somehow back into an ACC championship game appearance.

[square634]

Wujciak pick six!

[Pedro Cerrano]

14-6 turtles.

[square634]

And Jamar Robinson costs the Terps a great TD opportunity. 17-12.

[OregonBird]

Wow, Terps defense can't stop anything...a true freshman QB?

[Hallas]

So... Gameday said that the U scored a defensive TD on a sack -> fumble, then it said that O'Brien was sacked, then it said that the U commited a personal foul of some sort.

Any explanation?

[square634]

So... Gameday said that the U scored a defensive TD on a sack -> fumble, then it said that O'Brien was sacked, then it said that the U commited a personal foul of some sort.

Any explanation?

The refs called a defensive facemask that occurred before the sack/fumble. I didn't see it; it had to have been off the ball.

[square634]

The refs called a defensive facemask that occurred before the sack/fumble. I didn't see it; it had to have been off the ball.

Looks like it was definitely not a facemask. It was called on a linebacker bumping the releasing tight end. I can see a case for an illegal hands to the face, but the announcers are saying it's bogus.