Jump to content

Roch: AM isn't putting on a show for the fans by making offers he secretly hopes are turned down


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

I normally get that every year as a Christmas present for my wife (just so happens she takes me to Opening Day with her!). I heard last year they were thinking about not doing it anymore. I guess $100 per ticket for the left field bleachers is money the Orioles don't want? :rolleyes:

I swear this organization does things on a daily basis to intentionally piss off the fan base!

You didn't like the surcharge to buy tickets the day of the game? Doing away with the scalp free zone? Raising ticket prices to premier games by 25%. I wonder what they have in store for the fans this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I just cannot imagine that AM will allow himself to fail at obtaining his stated #1 objective of getting a big bat for the middle of the lineup for the third straight offseason. And not a Garrett Atkins type. A guy with a proven power track record. Whether it's a stupid contract to Pena, DLee, Reynolds, Konerko, whatever. He's going to get some kind of bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have loved to have had Dunn's bat in the lineup, but overreaction is what people around here do best.

Still, this is an important offseason. I am expecting some changes and if they don't happen, I'll also be leaning toward finding another GM.

As Weams said, AM targeted him as a DH, which I am on record as being for, so I thought the offer was fair.

This is the last offseason I give Macphail. If he doesn't do something to upgrade this team for the present and future then I am done. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, because its LESS money than he could have gotten with the Nats for 3 years. Come on Hank, you're better than this.

I think you're underestimating the importance of length of contract to these players.

There's no harm in placing a value on a player and making an offer. When the offer was made, I'm sure AM had no idea what the rest of the market would bear for Dunn. Given what he does and what he was making last year, it wasn't a lowball offer on it's own valition.

Obviously, Kenny Williams overpaid for Dunn - to Williams, his bat is worth 4 years and $56 million. To MacPhail it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Weams said, AM targeted him as a DH, which I am on record as being for, so I thought the offer was fair.

This is the last offseason I give Macphail. If he doesn't do something to upgrade this team for the present and future then I am done. Period.

I don't think MacPhail is great but you have to give him, at least till the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're underestimating the importance of length of contract to these players.
Would you seriously work an extra year at another job for less money than at your current job, all things work-wise being equal? Not to mention that you could have made more money in less time at your current job.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is even funnier is that the players being signed are not players most of us want. As you say, Dunn is half a player and the O's want a 1B who can hit and...wait for it...actually play 1B. Crazy I know.

Can we just wait until the offseason, or at least the Winter Meetings, is over before we start hanging MacPhail and Buck in effigy?

I agree with what you are saying here, but I just don't understand why they let out that they made an offer to Dunn.

In today's market, a 4/40 offer is bordering on ridiculous. I think that type of offer gives the impression to agents and other players that we aren't serious.

I think that some moves will be coming up shortly and I'm hopeful that they make an impact on this team. I just don't understand the rationale of this Dunn announcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're underestimating the importance of length of contract to these players.

There's no harm in placing a value on a player and making an offer. When the offer was made, I'm sure AM had no idea what the rest of the market would bear for Dunn. Given what he does and what he was making last year, it wasn't a lowball offer on it's own valition.

Obviously, Kenny Williams overpaid for Dunn - to Williams, his bat is worth 4 years and $56 million. To MacPhail it wasn't.

Why waste your time then. No one is accepting a below market deal to play for the Orioles. Rather than focusing on a move that he really wants to make he sends offers to guys he has no chance of getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're underestimating the importance of length of contract to these players.

There's no harm in placing a value on a player and making an offer. When the offer was made, I'm sure AM had no idea what the rest of the market would bear for Dunn. Given what he does and what he was making last year, it wasn't a lowball offer on it's own valition.

Obviously, Kenny Williams overpaid for Dunn - to Williams, his bat is worth 4 years and $56 million. To MacPhail it wasn't.

I'm not talking about the final deal with the Sox. I agree we should not have gone anywhere near that. I am talking about a less money deal than what he ALREADY REJECTED from the Nats.

The fourth year is meaningless unless we were offering MORE money. Dunn could have accepted the Nats deal, retuired after the third season of the deal, and STILL had an extra $5 million than what we offered! That's just an assanine bid from MacPhail!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, why would you NOT sell holiday ticket packages??? Even if no one but Dipper buys them, what's the harm?

By the way, I said yesterday that 4/40 wasn't quite a joke of an offer but it was close. But I didn't remember the 3/45 offer from the Nats. So, I'd like to revise my statement: 4/40 is an absolute joke of an offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you seriously work an extra year at another job for less money than at your current job, all things work-wise being equal? Not to mention that you could have made more money in less time at your current job.

That's Apples and Oranges, Tony... but I get the point.

It'd be a different strain of pissing and moaning around here if it was reported that MacPhail didn't bother to even extend him an offer. Hell, people would be whining about him not doing enough wining and dining if he had offered more money and Dunn landed in Chicago. We've seen all of this BS in the past.

I'm just sick of the whining.

There are still plenty of opportunities for AM to upgrade the roster. If he hasn't done that come February, I'll be right there along with everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...