Jump to content

Boston after Javy


eric0668

Recommended Posts

I don't think Varitek would play first unless his injury precluded him from catching. I also don't think the Red Sox worry about what to do with Javy once Varitek comes back. A winning franchise like this needs to make a move quick, they will get it done, if not for Javy then someone else.
Yes, they are in a pennant race, have a very demanding fan base and deal with incredible media scrutiny. They can't sit around for the next 4-6 weeks and watch Mirabelli and Huckaby fill in for Varitek. Javy would be a great fit for them - money not an object and they have a few minor pieces to deal.

Could we fit RLo into this thing? They've got real starting pitching issues with Clement and Wakefield down and Wells very questionable down the stretch.

Don't want to muck up a potential Javy deal but why not try to move RLo too? We're not going anywhere obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The fact that rosters expand in September is a very good point, that would allow them the luxury of having a third catcher. No telling how Varitek will respond to the surgery.

I had it and was back playing USTA in a week but everyone responds differently and all of the squatting would sure be different than playing tennis.

I still don't think the Red Sox should give up a lot for another old catcher who would be a rental though. It may depend somewhat if the O's are willing to pay some of the salary.

I personally wouldn't give up a lot for him because he has no future with Boston past October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I think they keep him for CF insurance. He has been called up several times to BOS. Think they would want him for depth when Sept. call-ups come around.

Several times? He was in Boston to start the season because of his Rule V status. Once they could send him down, they did and he has stayed in the minors since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several times? He was in Boston to start the season because of his Rule V status. Once they could send him down, they did and he has stayed in the minors since.

I'm talking over the past 2-3 years (appeared in 36 games last year), not just this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm talking over the past 2-3 years, not just this year.

That's wrong too. He couldn't go back and forth because he was a Rule V player. He was in Pawtucket at the beginning of last year on "rehab". Then he was called up last year. He stayed in Boston because he couldn't be sent down without being offered back to Atlanta. He is now officially the property of the Sox which is why he now in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's wrong too. He couldn't go back and forth because he was a Rule V player. He was in Pawtucket at the beginning of last year on "rehab". Then he was called up last year. He stayed in Boston because he couldn't be sent down without being offered back to Atlanta. He is now officially the property of the Sox which is why he now in the minors.

OK whatever - but he was in their lineup 36 times last year and did have a role. I don't think they will give him up in a deal today for Javy Lopez, do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK whatever - but he was in their lineup 36 times last year and did have a role. I don't think they will give him up in a deal today for Javy Lopez, do you?

It's possible, but they must like him since they went through a lot to keep him. They kept him on the roster so that they wouldn't lose him. He only played for the Sox out of desparation though. As soon as they were allowed to send him down they did. With Trot injured, I doubt they'd give up Stern. He's likely next in line if another member of the Sox OF goes down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible, but they must like him since they went through a lot to keep him. They kept him on the roster so that they wouldn't lose him. He only played for the Sox out of desparation though. As soon as they were allowed to send him down they did. With Trot injured, I doubt they'd give up Stern. He's likely next in line if another member of the Sox OF goes down.
Yes, here you're echoing my thoughts exactly. I don't think he'd be offered.

What happened to the guy who originally posted this idea? He must really like Adam Stern!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, here you're echoing my thoughts exactly. I don't think he'd be offered.

What happened to the guy who originally posted this idea? He must really like Adam Stern!

I'm right here and busy in my cube as always. Exciting times.

Nope, no mancrush on Stern. Let's see what happens with Javy, that's all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mltraderumours.com is speculating that the Red Sox may give up Abe Alvarez for Javy. 23 yr old AAA pitcher Left Handed. This is person that the Red Sox offered Colorado for Shealy

mlbtraderumors.com, literally, posts anything anyone sends them. I've sent them ridiculous joke trade rumors they posted verbatim.

They have less credibility than a middle schooler's blog. In fact, they may actually be a middle schooler's blog...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mlbtraderumors.com, literally, posts anything anyone sends them. I've sent them ridiculous joke trade rumors they posted verbatim.

They have less credibility than a middle schooler's blog. In fact, they may actually be a middle schooler's blog...

Yeah, its a bad site. I've never seen a single one of the trade rumors they've posted ever happen. I used to check it all the time until I realized it was crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, its a bad site. I've never seen a single one of the trade rumors they've posted ever happen. I used to check it all the time until I realized it was crap.

Personally, I go to prosportsdaily.com and go to their "rumors" page, which is all print articles referencing rumors. At least those rumors are from legitimate print sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...