Jump to content

So, what is being built?


Stotle

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
BTW Hello Harv, you are saying you expect the Orioles to win 71 games or less right now, correct?

You obviously didn't read what he wrote, he said "they won't have a winning record". That means 80 games or less, not 71. The way I look at it this is a high 70's win team, so he is on the mark there. (then again I have thought that for the last few years, and we see how that turned out)

And if we traded for Fielder, wouldn't we be giving up prospects in the deal not players currently on the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously didn't read what he wrote, he said "they won't have a winning record". That means 80 games or less, not 71. The way I look at it this is a high 70's win team, so he is on the mark there. (then again I have thought that for the last few years, and we see how that turned out)

And if we traded for Fielder, wouldn't we be giving up prospects in the deal not players currently on the team?

The Orioles don't have enough decent prospects to do a prospects only trade. You would still have to give up an Arrieta or Tillman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously didn't read what he wrote, he said "they won't have a winning record". That means 80 games or less, not 71. The way I look at it this is a high 70's win team, so he is on the mark there. (then again I have thought that for the last few years, and we see how that turned out)

And if we traded for Fielder, wouldn't we be giving up prospects in the deal not players currently on the team?

It would likely involve both players on the ML team and in the MiL. Otherwise we don't have the prospects to acquire Fielder in our MiL system.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously didn't read what he wrote, he said "they won't have a winning record". That means 80 games or less, not 71. The way I look at it this is a high 70's win team, so he is on the mark there. (then again I have thought that for the last few years, and we see how that turned out)

And if we traded for Fielder, wouldn't we be giving up prospects in the deal not players currently on the team?

Yep...I thought HH said we hadn't improved 5 games..It was the other guy that is pretty much the same as him..webbrick. My mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many others think we have improved 15-20 games this off-season?

Maybe 15-20 runs, but absolutely no way we win 15-20 more games with Reynolds and Hardy. If we add Laroche or Lee, a DH, and another starter then maybe, but the 2 we've added are not gonna start lightning in a bottle, and the young starters we have are not gonna all produce. If we have 2 pitchers to have 12 wins, I'd be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously didn't read what he wrote, he said "they won't have a winning record". That means 80 games or less, not 71. The way I look at it this is a high 70's win team, so he is on the mark there. (then again I have thought that for the last few years, and we see how that turned out)

And if we traded for Fielder, wouldn't we be giving up prospects in the deal not players currently on the team?

Not neccassarily..Guys like Guthrie, Pie, Tillman, JJ, Reimold, BB and Arrieta could and would all be in play in some kind of deal for Fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe 15-20 runs, but absolutely no way we win 15-20 more games with Reynolds and Hardy. If we add Laroche or Lee, a DH, and another starter then maybe, but the 2 we've added are not gonna start lightning in a bottle, and the young starters we have are not gonna all produce. If we have 2 pitchers to have 12 wins, I'd be surprised.

Reynolds and Hardy might be worth 8 wins on the outside. That's assuming they rebound to be 3-win players, and the O's got -1 from both short and third last year.

But it's possible that the O's are 15-20 wins better than the 64 wins they got in 2010 because of internal improvements and those acquisitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the Brewers were kidding when they went all in for 2011 by acquiring Grienke. Maybe they just wanted to mess with his head, trading for him, getting his hopes up by getting out of KC, then nuking the team just for spite.

Ahhhh. I get it. Plus, now it isn't OBVIOUS they need to trade Fielder, so their asking price can go way up. Brilliant, Brew Crew....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reynolds and Hardy might be worth 8 wins on the outside. That's assuming they rebound to be 3-win players, and the O's got -1 from both short and third last year.

But it's possible that the O's are 15-20 wins better than the 64 wins they got in 2010 because of internal improvements and those acquisitions.

As mentioned a few times, I don't think WAR necessarily converts to wins. I do believe that players' individual statistics don't necessarily capture their impact on the rest of the lineup. However, I agree with the central point here, i.e., it will take a lot more than just adding these two players for the team to improve by 15-20 games; it will require better performances by players already here. BTW, the O's won 66 last year, not 64.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...