Jump to content

Drunk Driver who killed Adenhart gets 51 to life


ITS KYLEEEE

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm happy he got 51 years. Pure Justice.

California routinely institutionalizes pedophiles in mental hospitals after their prison sentences have been served. And rightly so, these animals cannot be cured and should never see the light of day after their first conviction. Louisianna has enabled the death penalty for child molesters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

District Attorney Susan Price accused Gallo of three counts of second-degree murder rather than the lesser crime of vehicular manslaughter under the legal theory of implied malice: that he knew that drinking and driving was dangerous to human life – in part because of his prior drunken-driving conviction – but chose to do so anyway.

The key part of the article for anyone not understanding the stiff sentencing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I were hit by a repeat offender drunk driver. The only reason we are alive is pure luck or divine intervention depending on your beliefs. I will never forget hearing my wife scream like that. I'm glad justice was served. You shouldn't have to go through something like this to celebrate it. I'm very sorry that this had to happen to the Adenhart family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I were hit by a repeat offender drunk driver. The only reason we are alive is pure luck or divine intervention depending on your beliefs. I will never forget hearing my wife scream like that. I'm glad justice was served. You shouldn't have to go through something like this to celebrate it. I'm very sorry that this had to happen to the Adenhart family.

See, this is what pisses me off. People see that this creep got 50 years and they say "the system worked". BS with a bullet. If the system worked they guy would have never been in a position to get back behind the wheel after having already been arrested twice for drunk driving*. If the system landed on these sociopaths with both feet the first time they got caught then it would be working. By the time there's blood in the streets it's too effin' late, and the system hasn't worked.

First time conviction you go to jail for six months. Second time a year. After that it's life. Waiting for somebody to die before getting serious about a repeat drunk driver is systemic criminal negligence.

* and if you think three times caught drunk driving = three times driving while drunk then I've got a bridge to sell you. For every time they get nabbed these people probably drive drunk ten times without getting caught.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, this is what pisses me off. People see that this creep got 50 years and they say "the system worked". BS with a bullet. If the system worked they guy would have never been in a position to get back behind the wheel after having already been arrested twice for drunk driving*. If the system landed on these sociopaths with both feet the first time they got caught then it would be working. By the time there's blood in the streets it's too effin' late, and the system hasn't worked.

First time conviction you go to jail for six months. Second time a year. After that it's life. Waiting for somebody to die before getting serious about a repeat drunk driver is systemic criminal negligence.

* and if you think three times caught drunk driving = three times driving while drunk then I've got a bridge to sell you. For every time they get nabbed these people probably drive drunk ten times without getting caught.

Nicaragua used to execute first time offenders. Perhaps this is what you would prefer?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, this is what pisses me off. People see that this creep got 50 years and they say "the system worked". BS with a bullet. If the system worked they guy would have never been in a position to get back behind the wheel after having already been arrested twice for drunk driving*. If the system landed on these sociopaths with both feet the first time they got caught then it would be working. By the time there's blood in the streets it's too effin' late, and the system hasn't worked.

First time conviction you go to jail for six months. Second time a year. After that it's life. Waiting for somebody to die before getting serious about a repeat drunk driver is systemic criminal negligence.

* and if you think three times caught drunk driving = three times driving while drunk then I've got a bridge to sell you. For every time they get nabbed these people probably drive drunk ten times without getting caught.

So on your third DUI you should go to jail for life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I were hit by a repeat offender drunk driver. The only reason we are alive is pure luck or divine intervention depending on your beliefs. I will never forget hearing my wife scream like that. I'm glad justice was served. You shouldn't have to go through something like this to celebrate it. I'm very sorry that this had to happen to the Adenhart family.

On my 13th birthday we were hit head on by a drunk driver

The driver had a million drunk drving convictions and was driving without a liscence

By the grace of GOD:pray:all the pssengers in the car I was riding lived!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe

My nephew was murdered by someone drunk and drugged:(

This" Monster" has no remorse or plans to get help.

How many people should we alow this 'monster' to kill?:eek:

This is a complicted ?

People CAN change but...they have to want too

It's simply not practical.

As much as it sucks when you or someone you love is hurt/killed by a drunk driver, you simply can't throw someone in jail for the rest of their life because they have gotten a 3rd DUI.

The punishments are incurred when they hurt someone (as in the Adenhart situation) but you can't punish someone to that extreme because of what MIGHT happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...