Jump to content

Lots of well connected people are saying Edsalls name.


PaulBako

Recommended Posts

Its pretty impressive when you consider where the UCONN program was though. That's the key.

And the Big East has had some good years and good teams over the last 7 years...but agree that it has been down lately..Of course, so has the ACC.

There is no question that what Leach accomplished in TT is impressive..I am not doubting that. But those accomplishments don't make him a better coach than Edsall and they may not help him recruit because of the James stuff.

Also, outside of Crabtree, did his offense produce a lot of pro players? I don't recall hearing a lot of Texas Tech guys going pro but maybe I am wrong about that one...and yes, that is important to recruits.

Its really all about excitement Rob. Edsall doesn't bring any, and for a fan base that was basically thinking that Friedgen was fired because he couldn't bring excitement, Leach was the guy people had their hearts set on.

You may be totally right about Edsell, I'm not arguing against the guy as a football coach or recruiter, but he certainly doesn't bring a buzz of excitement that Leach would have brought. Reading through various sites, it the overwheling consensus is that Anderson just made a major mistake. Time will tell, but he just ruined any chance in a significant buzz for next season and along with it the bump in ticket sales.

They basically fired a longtime Terp for a guy 99% of the fans hadn't even heard of before today. Not smart in my opinion, but like ccbird said, we're used to Lucy pulling the ball out when it comes to the MD football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would have to think that the other ACC schools are ecstatic that we chose Edsall over Leach.

I think one point that hasn't been made here is why Leach wasn't chosen. This may not be an Anderson problem - but a problem of the current/future player's parents. If they decide to pull their kids because of Leach's problems with TT than that changes things.

Leach may be innocent - but the damage to his ability to recruit may be damaged beyond repair.

There is no real evidence that that would happen. Bobby Knight had similar issues but still managed to get good recruits at IU and TT. Other coaches have had character issues and managed to recruit. I'm not saying it wouldn't cause a couple parents to pull their kids but we aren't even getting looks from quality recruits and there is no reason to believe that Edsall will change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how people are already annointing the Edsall hire as a failure. When was the last time UMD has been to a BCS Bowl game? As SG stated earlier in this thread, Edsall took UCONN from a 1-AA football team to a 1-A team. Within the ten years of transition he lead them to a Big East title and a BCS Bowl game.

Leach would of been the sexy hire, but its a high risk move. Who's to say Leach wouldn't bolt after 1-2 succesful seasons for a higher profile gig. It's been known that Leach pursued other jobs while being employed at TTU. Leach's high flying offense would of been nice to see with O'Brien but when it came down to it, the AD, and higher powers probably didn't want to gain the baggage that came with hiring him.

Edsall is a good coach and wanted to be a Terp, give him time to turn this program into a great one and not run him off without introducing himself at the press conference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its really all about excitement Rob. Edsell doesn't bring any, and for a fan base that was basically thinking that Friedgen was fired because he couldn't bring excitement, Leach was the guy people had their hearts set on.

You may be totally right about Edsell, I'm not arguing against the guy as a football coach or recruiter, but he certainly doesn't bring a buzz of excitement that Leach would have brought. Reading through various sites, it the overwheling consensus is that Anderson just made a major mistake. Time will tell, but he just ruined any chance in a significant buzz for next season and along with it the bump in ticket sales.

They basically fired a longtime Terp for a guy 99% of the fans hadn't even heard of before today. Not smart in my opinion, but like ccbird said, we're used to Lucy pulling the ball out when it comes to the MD football.

You guys certainly know alot more about MD football than me, but you don't hire a football coach to create buzz. You hire the guy who gives you the best chance of winning, through his recruiting and coaching ability. IMO, Edsall is a very good hire for MD. He has done a very nice job at UConn, and built that program from the ground up. He'll have more resources at MD, and will be able to get better players than he could at UConn. I'm not sure what kind of program the fans are looking for, but he could turn them into a perrenial 9 win team. That's very solid for MD, and looking for anything more is not being realistic, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its really all about excitement Rob. Edsell doesn't bring any, and for a fan base that was basically thinking that Friedgen was fired because he couldn't bring excitement, Leach was the guy people had their hearts set on.

You may be totally right about Edsell, I'm not arguing against the guy as a football coach or recruiter, but he certainly doesn't bring a buzz of excitement that Leach would have brought. Reading through various sites, it the overwheling consensus is that Anderson just made a major mistake. Time will tell, but he just ruined any chance in a significant buzz for next season and along with it the bump in ticket sales.

They basically fired a longtime Terp for a guy 99% of the fans hadn't even heard of before today. Not smart in my opinion, but like ccbird said, we're used to Lucy pulling the ball out when it comes to the MD football.

Like i said, I can get behind that concept. I am not a MD sports fan, so I really could care less.

However, if Edsall gets this team winning and winning consistently, we can all agree that the excitement will figure itself out, right?

So, maybe in the first season or so, ticket sales don't go crazy but if Edsall comes in, recruits well and wins games, the excitement will come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no real evidence that that would happen. Bobby Knight had similar issues but still managed to get good recruits at IU and TT. Other coaches have had character issues and managed to recruit. I'm not saying it wouldn't cause a couple parents to pull their kids but we aren't even getting looks from quality recruits and there is no reason to believe that Edsall will change that.

Knight is also one of the greatest coaches in basketball history. He can show them his NC rings. Leach is a completely different situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no real evidence that that would happen. Bobby Knight had similar issues but still managed to get good recruits at IU and TT. Other coaches have had character issues and managed to recruit. I'm not saying it wouldn't cause a couple parents to pull their kids but we aren't even getting looks from quality recruits and there is no reason to believe that Edsall will change that.

Leach is not Bobby Knight in so many ways...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a season ticket(4) holder for the past 10 years, yes I'm excited. When you hire an AD from West Point you will not be hiring anyone who is perceived by the new Presdent & his new AD as anything but sqeaky clean. Yes, that was Ralph but he didn't put people in the stands. They needed to have someone in place by Tuesday & now it's done. You haven't seen anyone busting the bank to hire Leach. Maybe Pitt will do the honors since their new coach lasted about two weeks. I'm looking forward to renewing my tickets & seeing Danny O leading us to new hgts next year. Yes I "bleed" Terp red. GO TERPS!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knight is also one of the greatest coaches in basketball history. He can show them his NC rings. Leach is a completely different situation.
Leach is not Bobby Knight in so many ways...

Usually what happens to guys like this, they go to lower tier schools to build their reputations back up.

Now, that is much easier to do in basketball than football because of the amount of teams.

You could also argue that MD is a lower tier team but I think that is wrong....A lower tier school would be going to a perennial doormat in a major conference...like for example a team like Washington St. Go there, build the program back up and then he can leave for a bigger job.

Now, maybe MD is a school like that but they are usually a little better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No he's not but the character issues were there. Other coaches have had them too. There isn't any evidence that it would keep him from luring good recruits to UMD

Knight had "issues" when society chose to accept (and in some ways... honor) them. It was OK to get into a players grill and the players/parents/alum/fans/media accepted it.

But society/culture changed and Bobby Knight didn't.

Unfortunately - Leach had to learn the hard way and chose the wrong player to mess with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest baltimore34

Thinking outside the box here, but maybe MD was worried about Leach leaving in a couple years for a bigger more respected school. Just a thought. BTW i was hoping for Leach too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • You can’t assume he’ll win a rotation spot, but he’s valuable depth. He should have the opportunity to earn his way into the rotation but make sure to have at least 5 SP who should be better. 
    • Yep - Eflin was perfectly reasonable as a free agent prior to 2023.
    • He got 30 ABs. Does he get more if they aren’t resigned? Does he get called up sooner if they’re not here? When did he get called up again the second time? When Mateo got injured. 
    • Anyone see the Mets 9th inning last night down 2-0?  Just unbelievable.  That is the opposite of what we saw from the Orioles with their season on the line.  Incredible at-bats by Lindor and Nimmo and then a opposite field 3-run HR by another veteran Pete Alonso.  They then scored another run on a HPB, stolen base and Marte single.  The Orioles need to add a couple solid, dependable RH hitters.  They've needed this for the past two years.  If they just roll out this same position player squad next year with a couple dumpster diver additions that's just not going to cut it.  They also need a veteran leader of some sort, seems like that was lacking.  Also wondering if the LF wall is hurting this team not just on the field (clearly did in WC series) but psychologically and in terms of front-office strategy.  Maybe time to move that thing in 10 feet, especially if the offensive strategy is gonna continue to be "try and hit a HR on every pitch up and down the line-up". 
    • Yeah, Elias unloaded a ton of prospects/young players this year, tbh. Hall, Ortiz/draft pick for Burnes. Johnson and Chace for Soto (ugh) Etzel, Baumeister, and Horvath for Eflin Stowers and Norby for Rogers I get that there are injuries, but if Elias just dabbled in FA a bit more this offseason and shored up the bullpen and rotation they wouldn’t have needed to do at least 2 of those trades.  And while all of those guys except for Burnes (he’ll net a comp pick) are under control through next year (Soto, Eflin) and the year after (Rogers), I’d argue you could have used those guys in the offseason and/or for yourself if you just went the FA route.  I do think Elias gambled too much at the start of the year. With Bradish hurt back in February, that really left Burnes, Grayson, Kremer, Means, Wells, and Irvin. Well, Means had a setback and had an injury history, Wells had an injury history, and even though Suarez was a depth signing, the depth wasn’t all that great. There were plenty of options available in February to reduce the need to ever let it get to a spot to desperation sign Rogers, tbh.  
    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...